Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 4319
12/09/11 1:36 AM
JPZx wrote:Yo dgranger33 Due to the sabotaging of the LA/NO trade by david stern, and following in the footsteps of my athlete brethern Metta World Peace and Chad Ochocinco, I'm changing my last name to "Stern's Bi#&h" #effectiveimmediately
dgranger33 Due to the sabotaging of the LA/NO trade by david stern, and following in the footsteps of my athlete brethern Metta World Peace and Chad Ochocinco, I'm changing my last name to "Stern's Bi#&h" #effectiveimmediately
Interact
Posts: 11625
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS SanFranciscoGiants SanFrancisco49ers
Posts: 5919
12/09/11 1:38 AM
Animal Thug1539 wrote: gangsta207therevolution wrote: LOL at this clown Anmial Thug... CLOWN They were getting right back into the tax Dan with Dwight....And another layer. Most everyone said that the team was worse with Paul than they were. Hollinger projected losses in wins, everyone said this trade does NOT make them better. Best player in deal dont mean much when your worse off. Losing tax money? A you were not really going to lose the money, and B the Lakers are giving up about 50 million this year, MSG is giving up at least 30, Reinsdorph is giving 20 in revenue sharing to the collection of sorry *+* teams including your Cleveland Cavs. ( I give credit for rebuilding through the draft) Getting another 2-3 doesnt help you much at all. When are you going to see that you cannot make a profit if you dont draw, and market? What happens if a team shares 20 million and other teams end up with more profit? You dont think the guys who spear head the money arent going to be pissed? you'll never get a true response from me coming at me like that. COME AT ME REAL BRO.
gangsta207therevolution wrote: LOL at this clown Anmial Thug... CLOWN They were getting right back into the tax Dan with Dwight....And another layer. Most everyone said that the team was worse with Paul than they were. Hollinger projected losses in wins, everyone said this trade does NOT make them better. Best player in deal dont mean much when your worse off. Losing tax money? A you were not really going to lose the money, and B the Lakers are giving up about 50 million this year, MSG is giving up at least 30, Reinsdorph is giving 20 in revenue sharing to the collection of sorry *+* teams including your Cleveland Cavs. ( I give credit for rebuilding through the draft) Getting another 2-3 doesnt help you much at all. When are you going to see that you cannot make a profit if you dont draw, and market? What happens if a team shares 20 million and other teams end up with more profit? You dont think the guys who spear head the money arent going to be pissed?
Posts: 399
Posts: 4583
12/09/11 1:39 AM
Mr Jordan04 wrote:Tom Hanson wrote:if nets get howard for lopez that right there is robbery.... the magic will be horrible to watch.... I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about that
Tom Hanson wrote:if nets get howard for lopez that right there is robbery.... the magic will be horrible to watch....
Posts: 999
12/09/11 1:40 AM
dland24 wrote:A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed.
Posts: 9740
12/09/11 1:42 AM
JUS3 wrote: "Chris Paul is leaving New Orleans in 66 games. Heβs gone. And whatβs Dell Demps, and that franchise, going to have to show for it"Exactly. **@! makes 0 sense.
"Chris Paul is leaving New Orleans in 66 games. Heβs gone. And whatβs Dell Demps, and that franchise, going to have to show for it"
Posts: 16
12/09/11 1:44 AM
OneTrust wrote:Mr Jordan04 wrote:Tom Hanson wrote:if nets get howard for lopez that right there is robbery.... the magic will be horrible to watch.... I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about thatReally? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center
Posts: 3598
12/09/11 1:46 AM
Posts: 4585
Tom Hanson wrote:OneTrust wrote:Mr Jordan04 wrote: I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about thatReally? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center
OneTrust wrote:Mr Jordan04 wrote: I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about thatReally? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center
Mr Jordan04 wrote: I still dont get how that "trade" is even considered. I hope Salty Dan writes a letter about that
Posts: 3152
12/09/11 1:49 AM
OneTrust wrote:Tom Hanson wrote:OneTrust wrote:Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming centerSo you'd rather have an injury-prone andrew bynum? Okay, if you say so.
Tom Hanson wrote:OneTrust wrote:Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center
OneTrust wrote:Really? I actually think that's a good trade for Orlando. Brooke is the NEXT up and coming center
Posts: 21094
12/09/11 1:51 AM
dland24 wrote:A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed. But at the same time, the Hornets made a pretty good trade. I dont know. I guess I am going back and forth on this trade.
Posts: 1000
12/09/11 1:52 AM
denni5themenace wrote:ya'll really griping about FORTY MILLION DOLLARS? really? after the owners already ROBBED the players for a part of their BRI? REALLY?
Posts: 202
12/09/11 1:54 AM
dland24 wrote: Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league?
NBA247365.COMThe blog for NBA fanatics.
Posts: 4396
12/09/11 1:55 AM
ill steelo wrote: dland24 wrote: A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed. Exactly. Deal goes through if the Hornets weren't owned by the league.
dland24 wrote: A lot of you guys are clowning on Dan Gilbert, but dude has a point if what he is saying is accurate. Acquiring the best player in the deal and saving over $40 million dollars at the expense of a team owned by the league? I guess I am in the minority here when I say that I dont blame the owners getting pissed enough to get this trade vetoed.
However using logic it'd make a ridiculous amount of sense that the NBA owning the Hornets completely changed the landscape of how a trade could actually go down in this situation. And this has just suddently dawned on Stern and the NBA reps. And thus, they couldn't allow it to happen. Because it was too complicated with the team not having an independant owner. Unfortunately, he's going to take a massive PR hit for this, because it was handled poorly from the jump. Dell Demps should have NEVER had full clearance to make deals. Everything should have had to go to a vote of some capacity.
Posts: 4586
imINchucks5 wrote:OneTrust wrote:Tom Hanson wrote:So you'd rather have an injury-prone andrew bynum? Okay, if you say so.Yes. Brooke Lopez averages 6 rebounds a game. 7 footer playing 35+ minutes... Bynum gets 10 rebs playing 28mpg, and playing next to Odom and Gasol.Please, If bynum was a first option like Brooke, hed get 20ppg also.
OneTrust wrote:Tom Hanson wrote:So you'd rather have an injury-prone andrew bynum? Okay, if you say so.
Tom Hanson wrote:
Posts: 4320
12/09/11 1:56 AM
Posts: 17
12/09/11 1:57 AM
Posts: 1001
12/09/11 1:59 AM
Dade B0Y wrote: it was handled poorly from the jump. Dell Demps should have NEVER had full clearance to make deals. Everything should have had to go to a vote of some capacity.
Posts: 3599
12/09/11 2:00 AM
ill steelo wrote:denni5themenace wrote:ya'll really griping about FORTY MILLION DOLLARS? really? after the owners already ROBBED the players for a part of their BRI? REALLY?Not griping at all. Just stating why they vetoed it.BTW, that BRI split was necessary to keep league up and running. The league was losing 250+ mil per season
Share This