Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 4615
12/26/11 11:23 PM
RetroSan wrote:HankMoody wrote:RetroSan wrote:the production of a Nike/Jordan sneaker is about $10-$15 maybe even lessWhat does your reply have to do with his? My take? Absolutely nothing. Beats are not that bad at 150. However, there are too many concerns about build quality to ever consider them. Too risky.im saying that if your going criticize someones $200+ purchase for style (not you specifically) but have brought 100+ pair of sneakers for "looks" then your hypocrite
HankMoody wrote:RetroSan wrote:the production of a Nike/Jordan sneaker is about $10-$15 maybe even lessWhat does your reply have to do with his? My take? Absolutely nothing. Beats are not that bad at 150. However, there are too many concerns about build quality to ever consider them. Too risky.
RetroSan wrote:the production of a Nike/Jordan sneaker is about $10-$15 maybe even less
Interact
Posts: 4192
12/26/11 11:44 PM
RetroSan wrote:mondaynightraw wrote:scoopz wrote:but Echoes of Silence is 320kbps tho Vbr>Cbr. You prolly don't know what that is, though. and if you've ever spent over 100 dollars on sneakers you have no right to question anyone who owns a pair of beats
mondaynightraw wrote:scoopz wrote:but Echoes of Silence is 320kbps tho Vbr>Cbr. You prolly don't know what that is, though.
scoopz wrote:but Echoes of Silence is 320kbps tho
Posts: 911
12/27/11 12:06 AM
Posts: 2878
12/27/11 12:48 AM
Luffy&Zoro&Nami&Usopp&Sanji&Chopper&Robin&Franky&Brook
Posts: 2879
12/27/11 12:58 AM
Rap Sizzle wrote:RetroSan wrote:mondaynightraw wrote:Vbr>Cbr. You prolly don't know what that is, though. and if you've ever spent over 100 dollars on sneakers you have no right to question anyone who owns a pair of beats That is such a flawed argument. We wear sneakers casually as a fashion accessory. You wouldn't wear, say, retro Jordan IIIs to hoop in, would you? Performance actually matters for headphones because we use them to listen to music. If you're in it for the looks, by all means, go ahead and get some Beats, otherwise go for the many better alternatives to overpriced and overrated Beats.
RetroSan wrote:mondaynightraw wrote:Vbr>Cbr. You prolly don't know what that is, though. and if you've ever spent over 100 dollars on sneakers you have no right to question anyone who owns a pair of beats
mondaynightraw wrote:Vbr>Cbr. You prolly don't know what that is, though.
Posts: 543
12/27/11 2:16 AM
frostythepoptart wrote:Ok we're idiots. You happy? Go play In the sand box you lame. If i hear something that Sounds better / has the bass beats have ill cop But right now im not looking
Posts: 985
12/27/11 2:29 AM
Posts: 231
Posts: 2760
12/27/11 2:37 AM
Posts: 810
12/27/11 2:44 AM
RetroSan wrote:if they brought Beats just because they look cool or hype hat's ok because people do that regardless of what the product is (iPhone, Jordans, Fuji Water). Yes there are products in the market that are better (probably by a sizable margin) than Beats but people see them as an overall upgrade over whatever headphones they had before. it is NOT that serious call someone an "idiot" for buying headphones
Posts: 350
12/27/11 3:02 AM
you go boy wrote:ya you can say these joints are overpriced and i will agree with you so save the jokes... are they worth it? probably not... can you get better headphones for the price? probably...but these are great headphones and probably the best headphones i ever owned...and also they look good as well... so why did i get these? i figured let me get some nice headphones that look good but also lets see if they live up to the hype and if they dont i will return to amazon... so i put these solo hds on and they definitely live up to the hype... the bass is great and the treble is good too..if you are willing to drop cash on headphones id say cop but if you being cheap and could care less about some headphones and just want to listen to beats than pass
Posts: 4225
12/27/11 3:07 AM
Posts: 2610
12/27/11 4:05 AM
Posts: 2952
12/27/11 4:11 AM
HankMoody wrote:RetroSan wrote:HankMoody wrote:What does your reply have to do with his? My take? Absolutely nothing. Beats are not that bad at 150. However, there are too many concerns about build quality to ever consider them. Too risky.im saying that if your going criticize someones $200+ purchase for style (not you specifically) but have brought 100+ pair of sneakers for "looks" then your hypocrite How do you know he has done that in the first place? And so what if he has? Like he said (!!!!!!), these are completely different situations. People in here are insinuating that Beats are a good purchase from a sheer features, performance and build perspective. If it's for looks, go ahead. I don't care. But that's not what people have said in this thread. According to your logic, every single piece of advice in the history of the world is null and void. If someone has committed a mistake, and we all definitely have, his advice doesn't matter? Good to know.
RetroSan wrote:HankMoody wrote:What does your reply have to do with his? My take? Absolutely nothing. Beats are not that bad at 150. However, there are too many concerns about build quality to ever consider them. Too risky.im saying that if your going criticize someones $200+ purchase for style (not you specifically) but have brought 100+ pair of sneakers for "looks" then your hypocrite
HankMoody wrote:What does your reply have to do with his? My take? Absolutely nothing. Beats are not that bad at 150. However, there are too many concerns about build quality to ever consider them. Too risky.
Posts: 970
12/27/11 4:13 AM
Posts: 812
12/27/11 4:33 AM
Posts: 13688
12/27/11 7:12 AM
Posts: 4331
12/27/11 1:56 PM
Jumpman2314 wrote:Love my pros...Gonna eventually try them Sony 7506s tho...And a lot of beats by dre owners don't even know what Sennheiser's or audio technica's are...they just need a pair of headphones better then the standard ones they had before, go to bestbuy and try them on and make the purchase. If im not mistaken trying on most of the headphones you guys posted isn't really an option...
Oh YoU MaD wrote:Rusty Shackelford wrote:Any Nters have the Sennheiser HD 280sI have had previous experience with two of sennheisers more base models Pic for referenceI don't wanna go out in public looking like a disc jockey, though. Beats>*
Rusty Shackelford wrote:Any Nters have the Sennheiser HD 280sI have had previous experience with two of sennheisers more base models Pic for reference
Posts: 8794
12/27/11 2:22 PM
WITNESSkb24 wrote:Oh YoU MaD wrote:Rusty Shackelford wrote:Any Nters have the Sennheiser HD 280sI have had previous experience with two of sennheisers more base models Pic for referenceI don't wanna go out in public looking like a disc jockey, though. Beats>* Oh, because these don't look like that? I see
Posts: 105
12/27/11 2:26 PM
whyhellothere wrote:WITNESSkb24 wrote:Oh YoU MaD wrote:I don't wanna go out in public looking like a disc jockey, though. Beats>* Oh, because these don't look like that? I see those don't have swag tho
WITNESSkb24 wrote:Oh YoU MaD wrote:I don't wanna go out in public looking like a disc jockey, though. Beats>* Oh, because these don't look like that? I see
Oh YoU MaD wrote:I don't wanna go out in public looking like a disc jockey, though. Beats>*
jumpman247 wrote:If you like World of Warcraft then love World of Warcraft there is a chick that will give you head while you play, and then log in on her computer and play with you.
Share This