What takes more skill to excel at: Halo or Call of Duty? in General Forum

0 Points

What takes more skill to excel at: Halo or Call of Duty?

Author	Comment
hongcouver604		#21	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 825 01/17/12 7:00 AM	TennHouse2 wrote: Neither play street fighter now that takes skill yup, +1. the dexterity, timing, strategy & reactionary/motor skills required to excel at street fighter makes cod look like child's play. the learning curve for cod isn't steep at all, you can be good at it after playing 3 weeks straight. while if u wanna master sf & be the best player out there it'll take multiple years. execution on sf is waaaaaayyy harder to master than cod.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
sillyputty		#22	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 2808 01/17/12 7:06 AM	CLuTcH 713 wrote: ricerocket1 wrote: battlefield "Naturally the common people don't want war: Neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, IT IS THE LEADERS of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is TELL THEM THEY ARE BEING ATTACKED, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. IT WORKS THE SAME IN ANY COUNTRY." --Herman Goering at the Nuremberg Trials
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
MisterP0315		#23	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 21476 01/17/12 7:31 AM	Definitely Halo. Sadly, I've converted over to COD. I simply can't stand shooting dudes who run around corners...using armor lock and invisibility and all of that garbage anymore. I hope Halo 4 comes back strong. Thriller
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
c0dyboy2222		#24	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 756 01/17/12 8:10 AM	I've been to mlg events and have placed top 24 which is pretty good. without question halo takes way more skill.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
zk1MPLS		#25	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 6268 01/17/12 8:50 AM	JFMartiMcDandruff wrote: COD is all about ~~reaction time~~ a good Internet connection/ping. Fixed. And yeah, Battlefield is better. Team Philippines\|TEAM LAKERS ~~PSN: zk1mpls~~\|Origin: zk1mpls Twitter
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Wilroc		#26	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 945 01/17/12 10:20 AM	As far as the most popular shooters go Halo>Gears of War>Battlefield=Call of Duty I was good at Halo, but I never got to the level I was in the other games mentioned, just didn't play enough. Gears always had a steep learning curve even with them dumbing it down with the sequels. But BF=CoD for me. I literally change nothing about my playstyle when switching between those games and it works regardless. Run & gun to the max and I have a 3.0+ in BF. 2.0+ in CoD because sometimes I just play for the lulz.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Antidope		#27	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 332 01/17/12 10:50 AM	c0dyboy2222 wrote: I've been to mlg events and have placed top 24 which is pretty good. without question halo takes way more skill. Oh word? Which game? I've never gone but I play with kids whove gone and plan on going. Either way Halo is dead and H4 wont save it either. I used to go hard on halo myself, H3 in particular, they both take different skillsets to be good at, but COD is miles away the more fun game at this point. SAN ANTONIO SPURS STEPHEN CURRY#30 JAY-Z
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
omgitswes		#28	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 9455 01/17/12 10:52 AM	To answer OP it's def Halo. I think Halo requires more skill than Battlefield. Anyone can pick up a controller and play COD and have a good match. Counterstrike is a completely different story twitter last.fm tumblr
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
ebozek9		#29	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 156 01/17/12 10:52 AM	Pokemon Red. Looking to buy : Mars Retro 4 Size 9.5 through 10.5. CDP Retro 13 size 9.5 through 10.5. Hit me up through email or PM eric.bozek@gmail.com
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
CurbYourEnthusiasm		#30	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 926 01/17/12 10:57 AM	halo is retardedly simple. not to say MW3 is much more complex, but it is certainly more complex than halo. i could practically play halo 1 with my eyes closed.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
DougPe		#31	[url]	[-]
Registered User Posts: 41 01/17/12 11:02 AM	Hands down halo.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
seniosoul		#32	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 8443 01/17/12 11:05 AM	sNc magic wrote: theDEEK wrote: Counterstrike 1.6 true recoil
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
blakep267		#33	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 82 01/17/12 11:07 AM	Wilroc wrote: As far as the most popular shooters go Halo>Gears of War>Battlefield=Call of Duty I was good at Halo, but I never got to the level I was in the other games mentioned, just didn't play enough. Gears always had a steep learning curve even with them dumbing it down with the sequels. But BF=CoD for me. I literally change nothing about my playstyle when switching between those games and it works regardless. Run & gun to the max and I have a 3.0+ in BF. 2.0+ in CoD because sometimes I just play for the lulz. I agree with everything except the halo>gears. Both to me, require the same amount of skill. You have to be adept at the gnasher in gears, but also be able to guage distance and other variables as with halo. So for me, Halo = gears. As for COD, its just frenetic see somebody first, you win. which is not really the games fault, just the nature of the "type" of game. Realistic shooters only require 1 good shot to kill. So any real war game would have this issue
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
SoVerSoTowel		#34	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 3115 01/17/12 11:17 AM	I was just playing halo reach yesterday with some friends. Its still fun to me,cod is fun as well. But Imo cod is more difficult Troll Lyfe,..............Troll Lyfe,Troll Lyfe.............Fo0L.
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
CWrite78		#35	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 17359 01/17/12 11:20 AM	Wilroc wrote: As far as the most popular shooters go Halo>Gears of War>Battlefield=Call of Duty I was good at Halo, but I never got to the level I was in the other games mentioned, just didn't play enough. Gears always had a steep learning curve even with them dumbing it down with the sequels. But BF=CoD for me. I literally change nothing about my playstyle when switching between those games and it works regardless. Run & gun to the max and I have a 3.0+ in BF. 2.0+ in CoD because sometimes I just play for the lulz. What's the point of a good k/d ratio if your team loses? One Nation Under God Complex
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
Antidope		#36	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 333 01/17/12 11:21 AM	CurbYourEnthusiasm wrote: halo is retardedly simple. not to say MW3 is much more complex, but it is certainly more complex than halo. i could practically play halo 1 with my eyes closed. Try and tell this to die hrd halo kids, see what kind of reaction you get. Gonna look something like SAN ANTONIO SPURS STEPHEN CURRY#30 JAY-Z
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
The Minister		#37	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 3398 01/17/12 11:24 AM	i love cod and hate halo. but the answer is definitely halo 703 VA
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
CurbYourEnthusiasm		#38	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 928 01/17/12 11:32 AM	Antidope wrote: CurbYourEnthusiasm wrote: halo is retardedly simple. not to say MW3 is much more complex, but it is certainly more complex than halo. i could practically play halo 1 with my eyes closed. Try and tell this to die hrd halo kids, see what kind of reaction you get. Gonna look something like people who play halo hardcore after halo 1 just stink at COD... same with people who religiously play battlefield.... huge yawns for them. i'd argue GTA IV online is harder to be good in than battlefield AND halo... im not good at halo? i was 3rd in the only tourny i ever got in, at tOSU's campus i came in 3rd behind two twin brother roomates... who also came early like me and used their XBOX for the tourny to help so we tested the projections screens out we played 2 v 1 i beat them 100-20 they were 1st and 2nd on a campus of 55k+ halo is very very very very simple and easy. when they added the melee weapons it became a joke that i wouldnt even consider playing (and i dont even play mw3 all like that, its slightweight boring now, too) im decent at cod.....usually people discrediting COD are super terrible at it...hence why its not a good game, to them....
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
NLoc		#39	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 1296 01/17/12 11:46 AM	Battletoads My Blog________________________________________
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote
millionuppercuts		#40	[url]	[-]
Registered Member Posts: 828 01/17/12 11:49 AM	CurbYourEnthusiasm wrote: Antidope wrote: CurbYourEnthusiasm wrote: halo is retardedly simple. not to say MW3 is much more complex, but it is certainly more complex than halo. i could practically play halo 1 with my eyes closed. Try and tell this to die hrd halo kids, see what kind of reaction you get. Gonna look something like people who play halo hardcore after halo 1 just stink at COD... same with people who religiously play battlefield.... huge yawns for them. i'd argue GTA IV online is harder to be good in than battlefield AND halo... im not good at halo? i was 3rd in the only tourny i ever got in, at tOSU's campus i came in 3rd behind two twin brother roomates... who also came early like me and used their XBOX for the tourny to help so we tested the projections screens out we played 2 v 1 i beat them 100-20 they were 1st and 2nd on a campus of 55k+ halo is very very very very simple and easy. when they added the melee weapons it became a joke that i wouldnt even consider playing (and i dont even play mw3 all like that, its slightweight boring now, too) im decent at cod.....usually people discrediting COD are super terrible at it...hence why its not a good game, to them.... You always end up sounding crazy ignorant and give your life stories.You GO IN. . Why do you have to suck at X game to be good at Y game? Stop thinking like that. It's backwards. How does one experience you had in a tourney equate to the final word on a video game millions play? I think you're wrong that a lot of people hate on CoD cause they suck. Most of the people who hate on CoD are old school PC Gamers who used to mess with CS. It's the logic that a lot of CoD stans have that's annoying : More stuff = More complex. It couldn't be more opposite. The only CoD game that had good multiplayer was CoD 4 and that was because they kept it simple,straight up gun battles, all skill. It was the only CoD you can actually get good at. After that they just kept dumping perks, death streaks, etc. All this un necessary %#+! to bring in casual gamers and girls. But yeah I'm not gonna get too much into it. They're both past their prime but Halo is definitely held to a much higher standard then CoD. Halo will most likely be a top 20 series of all time with the likes of Half-Life, Zelda, GTA 3, Tetris. CoD has no chance at all; Maybe the first 2 which were praised for their single player but after that no chance in hell. CS > Halo > CoD @BEEFONMYBLOCK BEEFONMYBLOCK.COM BIMBADY.DEVIANTART.COM
Interact My Recent Posts	Reply Quote

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

What takes more skill to excel at: Halo or Call of Duty?