Login
ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 7
01/29/12 8:46 AM
Interact
Posts: 408
01/29/12 2:31 PM
Posts: 2259
01/29/12 8:14 PM
Posts: 189
01/29/12 11:28 PM
Posts: 589
01/29/12 11:33 PM
Posts: 3076
01/29/12 11:38 PM
MFPearson wrote:surprised no one was interested in this... ebay steal '03, but still fresh
teamAMfam X Fan # 4
Posts: 505
01/30/12 1:56 AM
TEAM AM FAMWanted: Yeezys any colorway sz 10-10.5 DS. PM ME!!!
Posts: 8
01/30/12 11:17 AM
Posts: 496
01/30/12 2:13 PM
Twitter
My Collection
Posts: 1751
01/30/12 2:54 PM
BIP Roberts wrote: One of the most common misconceptions about today's global economy is that nothing is made by hand anymore. That's not true. There are more goods made by hand today than ever before. When companies set up overseas and use exploited workers, the cost of production is nearly zero. It's cheaper to use 12-year-old Indonesians than to purchase and maintain expensive machines. I'm serious - listen to the This American Life from a few weeks ago about FoxConn and Apple if you doubt me. So, while sourcing the material may be more difficult - even though advances in factory farming probably shouldn't even imply that would be the case - the cost of production is still nearly zero. So, Nike Retro has ostensibly no advertising expenses, no R&D expenses, and the cost of production is virtually non-existent. So, why again, is the idea that we can't expect OG quality a reasonable argument? The only answer is corporate greed. And, that's no shock at all. Complaining that corporations are greedy is like complaining that Uncle Luke is raunchy. But, there are two conclusions here. One, don't defend Nike because when you do that you are falling in love with you captors - Stockholm Syndrome. Two, and more importantly, what we want CAN happen - there's no fundamental reason why it can not - so people who really care have to vote with their wallets. And, for the most part we do. Team AF1 does the vast majority of our business on the secondary market - where Nike doesn't see a penny of it. I spend literally thousands of dollars every year on sneakers - Nike/JB probably sees 25% of that at most. Overall, they're winning, but among US - they're leaving money on the table and LOSING.
Posts: 2264
01/30/12 3:12 PM
Posts: 4157
01/30/12 8:14 PM
Posts: 3814
01/30/12 8:31 PM
Posts: 2269
01/30/12 8:32 PM
Posts: 590
01/30/12 9:49 PM
Posts: 192
01/30/12 10:26 PM
zs05wc wrote:This should be interesting. I hope you can do the back panel too on the lows. In the pics they're just on the front portion of the shoe.
Posts: 193
01/30/12 10:39 PM
Stuntman Mike wrote:i think sneaker collectors make up a very small sliver of the nike profit machine anyway. we are probably just advertising tools to keep the brand relevant. tell me how much "profit" they made from the pigeon SBs? how much media coverage did they get? how much profit did they make from the yeezys? how much hype was built for the brand off that 1 shoe? how many people know the yeezys as compared to how many people know the LV dons/jaspers? they will continue to pump out low quality garbage to the masses at huge profit margins because it's what they do best and we will continue to be their pawns.
Posts: 4304
KVN wrote:Just saw on Nike ID's facebook that they are releasing AF1 high and lows with elephant print on Feb. 1st- Limited to 750 pairs
Team Seattle Seahawks x Team Air Force 1
Dakid23 x NT since 2003... My Twitter + AF1, Lebrons, & Pigeons 9.5-10
Posts: 194
01/30/12 11:03 PM
Posts: 591
01/30/12 11:38 PM
Share This