Search results

  1. kb-l

    LC ASAP Nike SB Dunk Low Black Cement

    I thought these looked good overall, but what threw me off was the cement print being a lot thinner on the front of the right shoe, as seen in the first photo. The production date is also not quite touching the barcode, although I don't know how much of a space there can be before it gets...
  2. kb-l

    LC Nike SB Hunter Forbes

    For the most part these looked good, but a few things threw me off. The Nike stitching on the back looked smaller than normal, and the reserved logos on the sole are definitely not as raised as the Nike logo. I had a hard time comparing to photos, so I figured I'd ask in here. Hopefully you can...
  3. kb-l

    LC 2001 Bred 11

    I got a second pair of bred 11s, and while for the most part the quality is the same, a few things threw me off. For one, the patent leather was cut much lower. Also, the patent leather felt much softer than on my first pair. My first pair had stiff patent leather. Not sure if that's because...
  4. kb-l

    Legit Check 2001 Bred 11s

    Just wanted to check these are good since the XI thread applies to newer retros
  5. kb-l

    LC 1994 Bred 1's

    The only thing that threw me off was the tag, seeing as most pairs have a different one, but I've seen a few with this tag and just wanted to be safe.
  6. kb-l

    Jordan 2011 Cement 3 LC

    What initially threw me off was the height of the elephant print was different on the back, but I saw it looked similar on my white cements which I got from Foot Locker.
  7. kb-l

    LC Laney V

    Noticed the 23 was placed differently on each shoe which threw me off.
  8. kb-l

    Legit Check; 2001 Bred 1

    Thanks in advance.
Back
Top Bottom