- 302
- 12
- Joined
- Nov 19, 1999
Chicks should digg this shoe cuz of the heels LOL...
Details Pics of Jordan 2009 aka Jordan XXIV
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by tastemykicks,
- Start date
- 63
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2006
No sir!
- 377
- 17
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2008
Co-SignOriginally Posted by Super Producer J
The details on the midsole and sole are.
With that said, heels JB? These don't even have a Team J-feel to them.
Whether or not these are called '09s or XX4, as of right now, these are a miss.
These make me appreciate the XX2 a lot right now.
- 648
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2003
normally, when detailed pics finally come out, i tend to have a more positive outlook on the next gen jordan, especially if i didn't respond well to theinitial sample pics. but i'm not getting that feeling this time around. AT ALL. they really do look like reebok products circa 2003.
- 886
- 12
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2008
look like a team jordan. the jordan line just isnt what it used to be including the 23. the 23 looked like an and 1 shoe. im only copping the old ones thegoodies
- 2,678
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2006
I have to see them in person to make a judgement!
- 464
- 482
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
horrible
Mactastic4167
formerly mac4167
- 5,909
- 1,022
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2008
easy easy pass, not a good look following up 23's
- 827
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2008
- 8,483
- 1,647
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2005
they're straight
- 2,869
- 119
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2008
the cw is probably the main reason people are comparing this with the xiv, its really not that similar i regard to shape. it looks like a high heel with asteel toe.
- 372
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2001
no way...
that can't be the real 2009s.
they must be early version to trick FAKE makers.
that can't be the real 2009s.
they must be early version to trick FAKE makers.
blco02
Banned
- 3,932
- 1,281
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2001
^ These shoes are already being manufactured overseas.
- 1,129
- 41
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2004
these havent been convincing enough for me
- 11,534
- 321
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
I just cant see myself buying these .. not a fan .
- 1,146
- 55
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2007
i wanted to wait till detailed pics came out of these before judging them. but now that we have them, they still look like cheap reeboks
- 2,165
- 10
- Joined
- May 22, 2008
these are BAD. maybe worse than 22's
- 30
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2008
Thats wat ive been thinking. imo they look like a mix of the xiv's, a pair of teams, and some cheap filas my friend balls in.
- 158
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2008
Will their be a commercial for these, or what?
mateen cleaves
Banned
- 10,196
- 12
- Joined
- May 11, 2008
ugly, really ugly.
- 22
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2003
Looks aside, who in their right mind would pay $190 for the same cushioning set up as a pair of SB's? I sure as hell hope there's some killertechnology and comfort to justify that price point. XX3's were revolutionary in every sense of the word, had full length zoom plus IPS. I need to see thetech specs before I completely disregard them, but wouldn't pay more than $110 based on what I see.
- 1,430
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2006
these are not wuts poppin
- 16
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2007
hell naw...looks like a space shoe...i have to see other colorways before i make a final judgement
poofyo101
Banned
- 1,903
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2003
shoes suck right imo look like some rbk crap
- 8,766
- 12
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2007
I think I posted ugly in here already just for good measure ....ugly
-bdis--
-bdis--
Similar threads
