Air Jordan 1 Retro Height Comparison Pics

• Dec 11, 2008

• #1

bigbadbennyism

518

888

Joined

Mar 10, 2008

Just threw this together real quick for comparison:

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #2

xxhonchoxx

4,676

13

Joined

Oct 8, 2008

Thanks, I guess.

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #3

bullsjayz

885

12

Joined

Sep 30, 2006

Ummmm..... thanks!? This would probably be better to put in the official thread at the top....

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #4

milestailsprowe

7,626

442

Joined

Aug 2, 2008

I REALLY NEED a pair of OLD loves some one hit me up in a 9.5-10.5 for around 100$


But seriously the OG highs are Higher then the highs we have now

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #5

coolgraymemo

8,779

495

Joined

May 9, 2008

thanks.
i always wanted to see that.
are regular low 1's higher/shorter that PHAT's

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #6

milestailsprowe

7,626

442

Joined

Aug 2, 2008

Originally Posted by CoolGrayMemo

thanks.
i always wanted to see that.
are regular low 1's higher/shorter that PHAT's

Click to expand...

same

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #7

k20lee

2,978

2,440

Joined

Dec 27, 2007

those OG wht/blk 1's look so sick!

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #8

az005us

1,360

28

Joined

Jun 29, 2003

ill compare the lows and then the 94s and 1s to the newer ones if anyone is interested.

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #9

ediaz411

1,884

63

Joined

Jun 3, 2008

those black and white og's are dope as hell

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #10

brendanmaguire

2,165

10

Joined

May 22, 2008

Originally Posted by XxHonchoxX

Thanks, I guess.

Click to expand...

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #11

dalyte1

129

10

Joined

Sep 4, 2002

Here you go

1994, 2001, and 2008

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #12

poofyo101

Banned

1,903

11

Joined

Feb 7, 2003

the og pic is a better comparison pic but thanks

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #13

9th Wonder

formerly 9thwonder23kid

17,422

32,573

Joined

Jun 4, 2008

Nice og's

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #14

enyceking

Banned

1,299

24

Joined

Oct 1, 2003

Originally Posted by dalyte1

Here you go

1994, 2001, and 2008

Click to expand...

thats the highest ive ever seen a 2001 pair look. its damn near tall as the 94s

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #15

w3stchicago

Banned

606

10

Joined

Oct 3, 2008

any OG's withe these 3? that would be a very nice comparison

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #16

rico7jt

11,534

321

Joined

Sep 21, 2006

Nice pictures to look at ...

 

• Dec 11, 2008

• #17

chicagokid23

6,994

85

Joined

Aug 11, 2008

thanks for the comparison

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #18

airforce1king

5,771

2,895

Joined

Aug 11, 2001

Originally Posted by enyceking

Originally Posted by dalyte1

Here you go

1994, 2001, and 2008

Click to expand...

thats the highest ive ever seen a 2001 pair look. its damn near tall as the 94s

Click to expand...

^QFT

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #19

dathbgboy

17,697

2,714

Joined

Mar 14, 2006

Thanks for the comparison pics always wondered how different the height was in the mids and hi's that we have now and the difference in the hi's nowand the OG's or earlier retros. I just never thought to take out my Old Love's and my CDP I's and compare.

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #20

funkman

933

21

Joined

Jun 19, 2008

good info
I think the highs are WAY more comfy than the mids
The insole is twice as thick and the ankle support is awsome
I use to switch insole in my 1s cuz if you walked in the mall for 3 min, ya feet would start hurting
I don't have to with the high straps- hope some royal straps drop

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #21

Mactastic4167

formerly mac4167

5,909

1,022

Joined

Nov 15, 2008

Good info

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #22

memphisboi55

28,092

2,603

Joined

Dec 21, 2002

Originally Posted by K20Lee

those OG wht/blk 1's look so sick!

Click to expand...

Ummmm, looks exactly like the retros next to it from that view.. minus the jumpman logo.

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #23

jordan supreme

2,961

15

Joined

Jul 28, 2008

good stuff, nice comparisons

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #24

packersgotme

2,246

10

Joined

Sep 13, 2006

pics..

 

• Dec 12, 2008

• #25

retromj17

799

10

Joined

Dec 16, 2005

nice "dalyte"!!!!!