Paranormal Discussion

I think we might find out alittle secret in our lifetime.
smile.gif
 
If it took 10,000 workers per month over a 20 year span to build the Pyramid like experts suggest, There wouldn't be enough people in a 500 mile radius to make this possible.
I'm sure that they wouldn't go out and grab 10,000 new people every month whereas they'd probably use the same workers plus othersevery month
 
Originally Posted by RobAF1


Theories suggest the Egyptians built these pyramids, but this asks us how Egyptians hauled 20 ton stones and placed them perfectly Hundreds Of Feet high (145.75 m, 481 ft high).. Some suggest they built a ramp with stones that went from the ground to the top.

The flaw in that theory is that It would take More Rocks to build the ramp than it would to build the Pyramid. When the Pyramid was done, where did these rocks go??? So that shoots down that theory...

Another question is How did they move these rocks.. Experts that insist Egyptians built the Pyramid suggest, Trees were cut down and smoothed off, and were used as giant rollers under these 20 ton rocks. If you would roll a 20 ton rock on 5 trees, The tree would be too worn down and awkward to haul another, so these logs would be replaced every Stone. Due to the fact there are over 100,000 stones that make up the pyramid, you would need an excess of a half million trees..

Problem with this theory is the lack of trees in that area. Egypt grows some Date Trees, that's about it. And they certainly wouldn't cut down all their date trees, for dates are one of the main foods in EGYPT!

If it took 10,000 workers per month over a 20 year span to build the Pyramid like experts suggest, There wouldn't be enough people in a 500 mile radius to make this possible.

Actually ancient Egyptian writing often talk of beings from the sky, the sky opening and bright lights coming down to teach them technology and give them wisdom. Many pictures and symbols resemble ufo's and aliens. POSSIBLY aliens built the Great Pyramid. And these solid long lasting construction techniques were adopted by the Egyptians.

http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtml
Your right, those theories might be seriously flawed and I can't present any better one's. But you also have to remember that these peoplehad nothing but time to think of ways to construct those pyramids Just because we haven't thought of way to build it (without using our technology)doesn't mean there isn't a way, maybe they invented some sort of lifting device (primitive crane or something with gears) that made moving the stoneblocks easier, we simple don't know. I know the monumental labor/work on how they built it might seem impossible for us to comprehend but they had nodeadlines, they had the resources (stone), it was an Empire (the most advanced civilization at the time) so I'm pretty sure they had a lot oflaborers/workers and several of skilled architects at the time (there were architects back then). I know my answer might sound far-fetched with no evidence toback it up but I you simply can't right them off as being ill-equipped and too primitive to build something like that (I'll repeat it again, they werean empire back then).
 
Originally Posted by RobAF1


Theories suggest the Egyptians built these pyramids, but this asks us how Egyptians hauled 20 ton stones and placed them perfectly Hundreds Of Feet high (145.75 m, 481 ft high).. Some suggest they built a ramp with stones that went from the ground to the top.

The flaw in that theory is that It would take More Rocks to build the ramp than it would to build the Pyramid. When the Pyramid was done, where did these rocks go??? So that shoots down that theory...

Another question is How did they move these rocks.. Experts that insist Egyptians built the Pyramid suggest, Trees were cut down and smoothed off, and were used as giant rollers under these 20 ton rocks. If you would roll a 20 ton rock on 5 trees, The tree would be too worn down and awkward to haul another, so these logs would be replaced every Stone. Due to the fact there are over 100,000 stones that make up the pyramid, you would need an excess of a half million trees..

Problem with this theory is the lack of trees in that area. Egypt grows some Date Trees, that's about it. And they certainly wouldn't cut down all their date trees, for dates are one of the main foods in EGYPT!

If it took 10,000 workers per month over a 20 year span to build the Pyramid like experts suggest, There wouldn't be enough people in a 500 mile radius to make this possible.

Actually ancient Egyptian writing often talk of beings from the sky, the sky opening and bright lights coming down to teach them technology and give them wisdom. Many pictures and symbols resemble ufo's and aliens. POSSIBLY aliens built the Great Pyramid. And these solid long lasting construction techniques were adopted by the Egyptians.

http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtml
I'm not saying that the last theory is wrong, it just seems that they're saying theory A is wrong, theory B is wrong, therefore theory Cmust be right
 
Either way it goes...I believe in aliens,ghosts,demons, and just about every episode of MonsterQuest...
I'm just really tired of waiting for proof!!
Like come on already!! I'm losing faith in the paranormal

My old college roomate works in Intelligence for the US Air Force..
Everytime we speak I try to pry something outta him but he never tells anything
 
Originally Posted by DaNiKeRhiNo

Originally Posted by RobAF1


Theories suggest the Egyptians built these pyramids, but this asks us how Egyptians hauled 20 ton stones and placed them perfectly Hundreds Of Feet high (145.75 m, 481 ft high).. Some suggest they built a ramp with stones that went from the ground to the top.

The flaw in that theory is that It would take More Rocks to build the ramp than it would to build the Pyramid. When the Pyramid was done, where did these rocks go??? So that shoots down that theory...

Another question is How did they move these rocks.. Experts that insist Egyptians built the Pyramid suggest, Trees were cut down and smoothed off, and were used as giant rollers under these 20 ton rocks. If you would roll a 20 ton rock on 5 trees, The tree would be too worn down and awkward to haul another, so these logs would be replaced every Stone. Due to the fact there are over 100,000 stones that make up the pyramid, you would need an excess of a half million trees..

Problem with this theory is the lack of trees in that area. Egypt grows some Date Trees, that's about it. And they certainly wouldn't cut down all their date trees, for dates are one of the main foods in EGYPT!

If it took 10,000 workers per month over a 20 year span to build the Pyramid like experts suggest, There wouldn't be enough people in a 500 mile radius to make this possible.

Actually ancient Egyptian writing often talk of beings from the sky, the sky opening and bright lights coming down to teach them technology and give them wisdom. Many pictures and symbols resemble ufo's and aliens. POSSIBLY aliens built the Great Pyramid. And these solid long lasting construction techniques were adopted by the Egyptians.

http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtml
Your right, those theories might be seriously flawed and I can't present any better one's. But you also have to remember that these people had nothing but time to think of ways to construct those pyramids Just because we haven't thought of way to build it (without using our technology) doesn't mean there isn't a way, maybe they invented some sort of lifting device (primitive crane or something with gears) that made moving the stone blocks easier, we simple don't know. I know the monumental labor/work on how they built it might seem impossible for us to comprehend but they had no deadlines, they had the resources (stone), it was an Empire (the most advanced civilization at the time) so I'm pretty sure they had a lot of laborers/workers and several of skilled architects at the time (there were architects back then). I know my answer might sound far-fetched with no evidence to back it up but I you simply can't right them off as being ill-equipped and too primitive to build something like that (I'll repeat it again, they were an empire back then).

I get your point, but the wheel had not even been invented yet, so that puts gears, and cranes (I think) out of the question. And for resources, yes they hadalot of stone, but the trees they would have needed to build the pyramids, they did not have, and would have had to import millions of trees that they didnthave in there region.

"What about the fact that the Egyptians had not even invented the wheel yet, but the blocks that they had to carry tobuild the pyramids weighed about 2 tons each? 4,000 lbs.? What did they do... use cement? In fact, they used so much stone, that if you took all of thestone they used and cut it into 1 foot square blocks, it would extend 2/3 of the way around the earth!!!"

EDIT: Sorry, I just read your above post..Ill stop debating.


HAS anyone ever had any paranormal happenings, or thought you had?
 
Originally Posted by gumbottombandit


this is the first 1 of 9 videos of the tape.� i'd post the rest, but it has curse words in it, it took me forever to get to 1000+ post and i'm too lazy to embed them all.� if you wanna do a search on youtube, just type in..............
[h1]Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County (Uncensored) 1/9[/h1]

I dont get it..I watched the whole hour and half, and it is obviously fake and is supposed to be. Previous to this recording, there was another fake videomade. But at the end there is an asking for information and a number to call. SO was there ever a McPherson dissapearence and abduction or is it all astory..??
 
I never understood why it is always thought that life on other planets was more advanced than us. I would like to see some theory, movie, something. That showsthe other planets are behind us in technology. Grass is greener on the otherside mentality I suppose. LOL
 
Originally Posted by RobAF1

Originally Posted by DaNiKeRhiNo

Originally Posted by RobAF1


Theories suggest the Egyptians built these pyramids, but this asks us how Egyptians hauled 20 ton stones and placed them perfectly Hundreds Of Feet high (145.75 m, 481 ft high).. Some suggest they built a ramp with stones that went from the ground to the top.

The flaw in that theory is that It would take More Rocks to build the ramp than it would to build the Pyramid. When the Pyramid was done, where did these rocks go??? So that shoots down that theory...

Another question is How did they move these rocks.. Experts that insist Egyptians built the Pyramid suggest, Trees were cut down and smoothed off, and were used as giant rollers under these 20 ton rocks. If you would roll a 20 ton rock on 5 trees, The tree would be too worn down and awkward to haul another, so these logs would be replaced every Stone. Due to the fact there are over 100,000 stones that make up the pyramid, you would need an excess of a half million trees..

Problem with this theory is the lack of trees in that area. Egypt grows some Date Trees, that's about it. And they certainly wouldn't cut down all their date trees, for dates are one of the main foods in EGYPT!

If it took 10,000 workers per month over a 20 year span to build the Pyramid like experts suggest, There wouldn't be enough people in a 500 mile radius to make this possible.

Actually ancient Egyptian writing often talk of beings from the sky, the sky opening and bright lights coming down to teach them technology and give them wisdom. Many pictures and symbols resemble ufo's and aliens. POSSIBLY aliens built the Great Pyramid. And these solid long lasting construction techniques were adopted by the Egyptians.

http://www.unexplainable.net/artman/publish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtmlhttp://www.unexplainable....ublish/article_2297.shtml
Your right, those theories might be seriously flawed and I can't present any better one's. But you also have to remember that these people had nothing but time to think of ways to construct those pyramids Just because we haven't thought of way to build it (without using our technology) doesn't mean there isn't a way, maybe they invented some sort of lifting device (primitive crane or something with gears) that made moving the stone blocks easier, we simple don't know. I know the monumental labor/work on how they built it might seem impossible for us to comprehend but they had no deadlines, they had the resources (stone), it was an Empire (the most advanced civilization at the time) so I'm pretty sure they had a lot of laborers/workers and several of skilled architects at the time (there were architects back then). I know my answer might sound far-fetched with no evidence to back it up but I you simply can't right them off as being ill-equipped and too primitive to build something like that (I'll repeat it again, they were an empire back then).

I get your point, but the wheel had not even been invented yet, so that puts gears, and cranes (I think) out of the question. And for resources, yes they had alot of stone, but the trees they would have needed to build the pyramids, they did not have, and would have had to import millions of trees that they didnt have in there region.

"What about the fact that the Egyptians had not even invented the wheel yet, but the blocks that they had to carry to build the pyramids weighed about 2 tons each? 4,000 lbs.? What did they do... use cement? In fact, they used so much stone, that if you took all of the stone they used and cut it into 1 foot square blocks, it would extend 2/3 of the way around the earth!!!"

EDIT: Sorry, I just read your above post..Ill stop debating.


HAS anyone ever had any paranormal happenings, or thought you had?
The oldest wheel found (from Mesopotamia) dates back to 3,500 B.C. and archeologist believe it was invented around 8,000 B.C. The Great Pyramidsis widely believed to have been built around 2,560 B.C.. I'm they had the wheel in Egypt by then because Mesopotamia was not to far away from Egypt.
 
Originally Posted by RobAF1

Originally Posted by gumbottombandit

man hasn't been able to come close to copying the technology or construction of the pyramids. we did not build them.
Agreed, The materials used etc, the weight, size and labour used are too great for builders now to make with all there cranes and other fancy tools. Yet man, 1000s of years ago, was able to build them with there bare hands, some wood and some rock..
That's because people nowadays are too lazy to do anything themselves.
eyes.gif
 
those theories about humans that used to be more advanced is interesting

hope they find atlantis artifacts sometime in the future
ohwell.gif
 
PULSARS -
In fact, this is exactly what happened in 1967 when Cambridge University radio astronomers Ms. Jocelyn Bell and Dr. (now Professor) Antony Hewish discoveredfirst one, and then a second regular pulsing source in two widely-separated parts of the sky. Since no pulsing signal sources other than terrestrial man-madeones had ever been seen before, a strong possibility of ETI-origin was suspected. The scientists decided that, if this proved to be correct, they could notmake a public announcement without checking with higher authorities. There was even some discussion about whether it might not be in the best interests ofmankind to destroy the evidence and forget it!
 
yo rob, like i said before, back in 90 something i didn't believe this story much and the footage didn't help make the story any more believable. so toanswer your question about an actual McPherson abduction, i don't know and i doubt it ever was.

f3DJam asked me to expound on the artificial moon theory, but where do i start? let me say this, i personally don't remember what texas schools taught meabout the moon. my girl says she recalls them saying the moon moved through space and was caught in our gravitational pull. whatever disinformation they triedto teach us, i guess it worked cause we raised no questions and just didn't take interest in the matter anymore.

the science channel, on the other hand has its own theory of the moon. if i remember correctly, it states the moon was formed from debris thrown out into spaceafter a smaller planet sized body collided with earth. they teach that the moon is slowly moving away from the earth at a rate of a couple of centimeters aday, or something like that. they say the moon does not support life, it doesn't have an atmosphere, and is just completely covered in craters and isbarren.

it doesn't touch on the fact our moon is looked at as an anomaly in our solar system compared to the other planetary satellites. one reason being, itdoesn't spin. the moon is a perfect sphere that can block out our view of the sun. study of its rocks show some of them to be billions of years older thenthe oldest rock on earth. astronomers have seen clouds on the moon and unexplained florescent lights moving along the surface since the early 1900s.

u.s. astronauts and russian cosmonauts have stated they witnessed structures and ufos on the moon when they arrived. there is a video on the tube (not sure ifit is true or not but i looks pretty interesting) that shows buzz or neil walking into one of these structures.

there are so many ideas about the '69 moon landing, so i won't go into that. i will say this, i do believe there are two different space groupscontrolled by our government. there is the NASA that we are familiar with, and a top secrete NASA program that has been to the moon years before Neil and Buzz.NASA tells us that we have not been back to the moon. NASA workers have come forward and said we have been to the moon before 1969, mars, and other planetswithin our solar system. a female called into a radio station called coast2coast AM to ask about a mission to mars that occurred in 1970 something. she saidshe walked in on a video feed being transmitted from a rover on mars. the rover captured two figures walking over a ridge up to the rover and doing somethingto it that cut off its video feed. she asked the guest on the show if he had any more info about the situation even though she worked for NASA at the time.

i'm getting pretty long winded on this subject. i'm sorry.
 
Shock waves encode 'Lifecloud' computer
Column: UFO disclosure
Posted on Saturday, 20 December, 2008

When large comets hit the Earth, boulders with organic debris splash back into space. For that reason, an expanding "biodisc" of dormant microbespreserved inside tiny rock fragments, 30 or more light years across, could encircle our solar system. A previous paper, "Living Proto-Cells Made inSpace," (2008), reviews the panspermia BioDisc premises of Cardiff University scientists and notes how bacteria can physically store and transmit"bits of data" within a biologically self-organizing network. A gravitationally microlensed projection on a sheet of dormant microbes couldreconstruct electromagnetic aspects of a wavefront. Irradiating simple ice grains with ultraviolet radiation can emanate membranous-layered structures orproto-cell "amphiphiles" in space. Living bacterial particle code computing is faster and more secure than conventional computing. A fertile BioDiscsurrounding our solar system could be a natural supercomputer and the active storage disc of life's genetic database.

Observations of the 1997 Hale-Bopp comet indicated that comet collisions into the Earth brought water, nitrogen and carbon dioxide to produce our atmosphere. Afew weeks after the passing of Hale-Bopp, NASA researchers Chris McKay and Bill Borucki showed that an "impact" itself could have been a key event inthe origin of life. They mimicked a collision of a comet and Earth by aiming a laser blast at a vial of gas simulating the composition of the early atmosphere.They found that "powerful shock waves" from the microblast created temperature and pressure changes that altered the molecules of the atmosphere.
 
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31

I never understood why it is always thought that life on other planets was more advanced than us. I would like to see some theory, movie, something. That shows the other planets are behind us in technology. Grass is greener on the otherside mentality I suppose. LOL
It could really be either way, they don't have to be more advanced, they could be less advanced. Plus, who's to say that there aren'tmany unknown species living in our very own waters or what not?
 
I think a good majority of aliens are primitive but have materials on their planet that could make space travel more efficient compared to us
 
2012 = the quarantine is lifted off earth

thats when aliens have the right to visit earth

and let it be known
 
Back
Top Bottom