- 5,423
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Watch all the nt'ers buy this magazine on the low.
I respect his craft and talent...But everything else is just off wit this N'...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Watch all the nt'ers buy this magazine on the low.
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Watch all the nt'ers buy this magazine on the low.
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Watch all the nt'ers buy this magazine on the low.
Originally Posted by memphisboi55
Watch all the nt'ers buy this magazine on the low.
agreed 100%.Originally Posted by EzFlash26
^if you black, from the inner-city, it damn sure is different, you cant get more different than this N' here...
I think dude problem is, and I caught on right after CD, dude wants to be accepted by "that" crowd so bad, you can tell...not that there is anything wrong with that, dude been gone tho in my eyes...thats why none of that '808' **** shocked me, thats who he wanna be...
Originally Posted by allen3xis
Dude lost me about 3 years ago..
Thats called an Oreo Cookie ...
Originally Posted by Tom Jooks
From what I've gathered here is that NT's Music Forum thinks Kanye is "Gay" and a "sissy" because he's posing nude (supposedly).
You must feel that way about Big Daddy Kanye too then.
True...dude has a radical view on art, but I don't think he's playing for the other team like that.Originally Posted by Tom Jooks
Listen Vinnie Paz, can you form a opinion on your own?
I never said Kane was gay. I'm saying Kanye's "nude pic" could be him draped in sexy women. You never know.
I wish everyone wouldn't judge Kanye so quickly. Don't we all have the dream "to make it". That dream to take over the world. Well he made it and he's trying to become the biggest entertainer on the planet. He's doing it through some questionable decisions but let the man live.
Tom Jookshttp://tom-jooks.niketalk.yuku.com/
and e, everybody knew about Kane in that 'Sex' book, Kane was smashing Madonna back then, Kane's image was that of a sex symbol...Kanye is on somecomplete other ****...N's been calling Kanye gay long before this news, dont act new....
Kanye hates being stereotyped as how black males (let alone a rapper) are "supposed" to act & carry ourselves by society, so he tries to doeverything he can to shed that...I aint got no problem with that, I understand him actually, he just cares about it wayyy too much, dude lost me awhile ago...
Do people forget that Ye stays on this art *@@@, dude was in an art school for that purpose. So I think that'd be the difference, this is hislane as well, because there are a lot of people who consider nudity an art form. John Lennon was on a CD cover, Jimi Hendrix let people make sculptures of himposing nude, people would consider that art, but if a hip hop artist of black American culture did so it wouldn't have artistic value, just deemed homosexual, as you and others have proved.Originally Posted by SEND ONE
The difference when Kane did it was that that was his lane. That's most of what his career was about. Kane was the Hip Hop "Leon Phelps", so it fit his image perfectly and no one really questioned it.
As far as Ye trying to "break every rule and mentality of hip-hop, of black culture, of American culture", the only way he could do that would be to pose with dudes...........which wouldn't surprise me if he did.