How many people arent buying the Jordan 2009 because they aren't called the Jordan 24?

Dosen't matter what it's called. They could of called the 23's the jordan stupid shoe and I still would of copped cause of what it looked like,something I liked.
 
All I know is these ones are growing on me and might get copped...not for retail of course...
grin.gif



5b8250cead4d0ed66124183cb027f3e78556955.x-png
 
Originally Posted by thakickboss

i don't care about any shoes name. i buy what i like.
^^Exactly!!! Posts these days get dumber n dumber right? Nobody's buying then cuz they're boo-boo. I don't care if they fealt likeclouds on my feet or what they were called, they look like boo-boo.
 
Interesting to see how people are so quick to slam Brand Jordan, yet they haven't a clue about some of the staff changes going on at JB.

If you're going to criticise JB, step your knowledge up first.
 
the fact that they arent called Jordan 24 only adds to the numerous other reasons these shoes won't be copped
 
to keep it real, once the 23rd jordan was created there is really no reason to buy the next signature line.....

cuz essentially whats the difference between these and and 120 dollar team jordan other then the technology? absolutely nuffin..... the context of these shoeswere never fully established...and

as a result, floundered in the market.
 
swingshot wrote:
Interesting to see how people are so quick to slam Brand Jordan, yet they haven't a clue about some of the staff changes going on at JB.

If you're going to criticise JB, step your knowledge up first.

For most people here it seems the AJ2K9 is an ugly shoe being sold at a ridiculously high price. What difference at all do staffing changes make? The shoes areugly and overpriced. Are you suggesting we praise the shoes and run out to buy them simply out of sympathy for JB's staffing changes? JB is a business andthey need to supply the consumer what they want and a price they will pay or they risk losing business just like any other company.
 
im not buyin dem cuz i dunt like them, i dunt think they are ugly. i jus dunt like them. and 190 is crazi money to be payin for such a simple lookin shoe. icopped some DS olympic VII's instead for 180 lol
 
i buy what i like and these shoes are hideous. i dont ball anymore so i wouldnt be paying for performance. especially not at that price. hyperdunks for the win
 
i wouldn't care if these were the air jordan 23, i would still pass. these 2009's are GARBAGE. i couldn't believe what i saw when i held them in myhands. my, how the mighty have fallen.
smh.gif
 
i passed becoz they are overpriced and 1 looking shoes. plus since they weren't the 24's that made my decision really easy. so i passed for 2 reasons.
 
to be honest i'm glad they didn't number this shoe the 24, because that would have tarnished the legacy of the numbered jordan. the shoe is disgustingthat is why i didn't cop
 
Originally Posted by lilhen18

swingshot wrote:

Interesting to see how people are so quick to slam Brand Jordan, yet they haven't a clue about some of the staff changes going on at JB.

If you're going to criticise JB, step your knowledge up first.

For most people here it seems the AJ2K9 is an ugly shoe being sold at a ridiculously high price. What difference at all do staffing changes make? The shoes are ugly and overpriced. Are you suggesting we praise the shoes and run out to buy them simply out of sympathy for JB's staffing changes? JB is a business and they need to supply the consumer what they want and a price they will pay or they risk losing business just like any other company.





If you're determined to take the comment out of context be my guest.
 
Originally Posted by tz85

im just waiting for the black/white pair in april


I know a lot of people don't like the looks, shoe is crazy comfortable. If you're on the edge, just try it on.
 
Back
Top Bottom