NT, do you think this is ethical? Vol. Clinic will allow parents to customize their babies.

784
10
Joined
Oct 3, 2006
[h1]Custom-made babies delivered: Fertility clinic doctor's design-a-kid offer creates uproar[/h1]
BY Gina Salamone
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

Tuesday, March 3rd 2009, 3:06 AM

amd_makingbabies.jpg

Photo Illustration by Isaac Lopez/News
Boy or girl? Blond or brunette? Blue eyes or brown? Fertility doc thinks he can deliver.

Dr. Jeff Steinberg has already let thousands decide their kids' gender. Now he says that within the next six months, the Manhattan and L.A. offices of his Fertility Institutes will let would-be moms and dads pick whether junior has blue or brown eyes or black or blond hair.

"In the process of doing gender selection ... we've also uncovered the technology [to] characterize things like eye and hair color," said Steinberg, 54.

The idea of a Build-A-Bear style baby was slammed Monday by bioethicists and right-to-life groups - and Pope Benedict has warned against it for years.

The Pope railed against the "obsessive search for the perfect child" just two weekends ago. "A new mentality is creeping in that tends to justify a different consideration of life and personal dignity," he said.

Steinberg countered that reproductive technologies aren't about to go away.

"Genetic health is the wave of the future," he said. "It's already happening and it's not going to go away. It's going to expand. So if they've got major problems with it, they need to sit down and really examine their own consciences because there's nothing that's going to stop it."

Custom-made kids will be achieved through preimplantation genetic diagnosis, or PGD, the procedure used to weed out problem embryos and to allow parents to choose a gender.

In letting parents decide what traits their kids have, doctors will examine the genetic makeup of embryos created in the lab and implant the ones that have the best chance of giving mom and dad what they want.

Some doctors question Steinberg's ability to give parents their pick of traits.

"He's the only one offering this because you can't yet do it," said Sean Tipton of the American Society for Reproductive Technology. "Nobody can do this right now."

Dr. William Kearns, head of the Shady Grove Center for Preimplantation Genetics in Rockville, Md., disagrees. His research has identified genes relating to northern European skin, hair and eye pigmentation, but he won't use it to let parents design their kids.

Steinberg, one of the doctors who helped produce the first test-tube baby, admits the technology isn't 100% - and says for now the best results are with couples of Scandinavian heritage, whose gene pools are the least diluted.

"Say you made seven embryos, and one of them has got the highest chance of green eyes, and that chance is 80%. It's not perfect science because eye and hair color are not perfect genetics," said Steinberg, who opened an office on E. 40th St. two months ago.

There are no laws in New York that address how PGD testing can be used. Opponents say there should be.

Lori Kehoe, executive director of the New York State Right to Life Committee, is upset that the embryos deemed undesirable will be destroyed.

She said it is "sickening to flush a member of the human family down the drain" because they are not considered perfect.

Prof. Alexander Capron, bioethicist and professor of law and medicine at the University of Southern California, called Steinberg's procedure problematic. "The notion of unconditional love and support - which is assumed to be what parents owe their children - is totally undermined here," he said.

"You're saying I want to order up just what I want and that's what I'll love."

One New York doctor even likened it to the pursuit of a master race.

"We're crossing the line into eugenics, the theory of trying to give people enhanced characteristics - genetic engineering to make sort of the superman or superwoman," said Dr. Daniel Sulmasy, director of ethics at New York Medical College and St. Vincent's Hospital.

gsalamone@nydailynews.com

this is like a nikeid for your kids
laugh.gif


sorry if already posted.
 
why only blonde or blue? hazel eyes? purple tones? is that too hard to do? what about dirty blonde? everything is not "perfect". btw, if everyone hasblonde haired blue eyed, that just makes the brunettes more "rare" and then those types will be highly sought after... these parents are a bunch ofhypebeasts. blonde wont be in style in 15 years when EVERYONE has a blonde child lol
 
it's fine with me. i can't lie though if they let me pick anything i would probably customize my lil dude to have tan/brown skin, blue eyes, and curlyred hair just cause i can
laugh.gif
 
This is sort of sick to me. Like, the cool thing for me is that you never know what your baby is going to look like. Takes all the fun out of it...
 
I have a picture in my head right now.
Two white parents talking with a doctor.





"can we get it in black?"


LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally Posted by davidisgodly

this will erase the black race......

say no
You seem dumber and dumber every time you post.

Anyways, this is really awful to me upon further review. They're gonna make a bunch of embryos and just toss out the ones that they don't like? ##%# isdisgusting.
 
Disgusting. I can see if you want to take a gene that carries a hereditary disease but to alter the child's appearance is terrible. Not everyone can behandsome.
 
So if the kid isnt really yours and the chick knows it she can make it look like you to keep you around with no question. For scandalous females they probablylickin they chops and campin out for this.
 
It is absolutely not ethical because if this is allowed to continue it would trigger divergent evolution that would result in 2 differentspecies being separated by class/wealth. Only the wealthy can afford to customize their babies.


In addition diversity is life's solution to a lot of environmental stressors eg. disease, microbes. By being able to select certain traitsunnaturally we may lose some of this diversity. Everyone would want the latest designer trait.....bigger muscles, taller babies, a certain eye color. HypebeastParents following genetic trends=loss of diversity=bad for the human race.
 
Originally Posted by OHyeah10

the kid wouldnt even look like the dang parents!
i think it would depend on how much customizing the parents do. some parents may just keep the "factory settings," but just go withblack hair or something.
 
Originally Posted by JayHood23

So if the kid isnt really yours and the chick knows it she can make it look like you to keep you around with no question. For scandalous females they probably lickin they chops and campin out for this.

those type of broads dont have the money for this anyway
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by AntonLaVey

It is absolutely not ethical because if this is allowed to continue it would trigger divergent evolution that would result in 2 different species being separated by class/wealth. Only the wealthy can afford to customize their babies.


In addition diversity is life's solution to a lot of environmental stressors eg. disease, microbes. By being able to select certain traits unnaturally we may lose some of this diversity. Everyone would want the latest designer trait.....bigger muscles, taller babies, a certain eye color. Hypebeast Parents following genetic trends=loss of diversity=bad for the human race.

For one of the first times, I totally agree with you.
 
I doubt I'm ever going to have kids but if I do that sounds cool as hell. I'd do it.
 
those type of broads dont have the money for this anyway
oh you better believe they will kick cartwheels, start a fundraiser, do whatever they gotta do to get the bread for it
 
Back
Top Bottom