Animal Cruelty UNAPPRECIATION

Originally Posted by tSamShoX

Yeah...I can hardly watch animal cops. That #!$# hits me deep when you see those neglected animals starving.....

frown.gif
 
Realtalk I get teary eyed when I see neglected animals. How can anyone treat another life form like that. Its just cold
smh.gif
smh.gif
frown.gif
 
old people with 100 cats in a trailer home or 7 dogs who have matted fur and bad eyes.. thats what saddens me. the courts are too leniant to most abusers..Vick got what everyone deserves but he was just made an example of because that will never happen again.
 
I still don;t get how people cry for vick

he was a moron for the dogs AND the gambling


but yeah meat for feed=yummy

but in my mind, people who outright hurt animals are borderline sociopaths
 
I hate animal cruelty. People who abuse animals or enjoy animal abuse have serious physiological problems.
 
Originally Posted by tSamShoX

Yeah...I can hardly watch animal cops. That #!$# hits me deep when you see those neglected animals starving.....
Same here, some people don't deserve the rights to take in pets in that show.
tired.gif
 
The good news is that, while you may feel isolated within your peer group and family, you're absolutely NOT alone.
It's just messed up how us humans don't really respect other life on this planet. There is a worldwide mass slaughter of animals so we can eat them and people for the most part don't care.
I agree completely - and even those relatively unconcerned about the ethical aspects of animal consumption must confront the environmental impactof factory farming and animal-based diets in general. While the selfless and empathic have always been troubled by this issue, it is in our own self-interest,at the very least, reduce the production and consumption of meat if we wish to sustain this planet's humanpopulation.

One of my all time favorite quotes comes from Mohandas Gandhi, who said, "You must be the change you wish to see in this world." With any sincereform of activism, true and lasting change starts from within. The first thing any global warming denier points to, for example, is Al Gore's carbonfootprint - his use of private jets, the size and energy consumption attributed to his cavernous mansion, thus and so. It's for that reason, followed bythe health benefits, that I became vegan. I believe it's one of the best things we, as individuals, can do for ourselves and to raise awareness amongthose around us.

If you'd like to discuss it further, feel free to send me a PM. I'll be happy to point you to some additional resources if you wish. I've reallyenjoyed discussing this with a number of my fellow NT users recently and I'd look forward to hearing from you as well. It's always great to talk withothers who value life and empathy.


I remember in Biology class learning that the human digestive system was originally meant to digest vegetables, not meat, then over time we became meat eaters. (as you can see through all the diseases and sicknesses that meat gives us)
Since we can't eat raw meat, then scientists argue that we are not inherently carnivors.
That's absolutely true. I actually posted about that in another thread a few months back if you're interested: http://niketalk.com/topic/132798?page=3

people went crazy against Vick and we put him in jail because he hurt dogs, which are companion animals in our culture. However, people dont care about abuse to farm animals, because we dont consider them as pets or companions, they are just food to us so we dont care.
It's interesting, because there exist varying hierarchies of life. In the US, many consider the thought of eating dog meat repugnant and findfur to be morally reprehensible, yet they have no problem eating beef and wearing leather. Bullfighting and cockfighting are considered cruel and barbaric,yet game hunting is considered a legitimate sport and slaughtering livestock has been deemed "humane."

Most people won't eat dolphins, in part, because they're considered intelligent - yet scientists have long hailed the intelligence of pigs.

You'd be hard pressed to get a consistent, logical explanation as to why, exactly, it's wrong to kill certain animals, but not others. For the mostpart, most people simply seem to accept the prevailing tradition without question or critical examination. By and large, we eat chicken because, as children,that's what was served to us. It tasted good and kept us alive. Yet each of us has the right and freedom to challenge that.
For every person who legitimately abuses an animal (not domestically, but slaughterhouses, packing plants, etc.), there are hundreds that don't. Don't make this out to be some widespread epidemic.
First of all, even those relatively unconcerned with the lives of animals would likely be outraged by the conditions of many slaughterhouses - ifonly due to 1) the health and safety of their food and 2) human rights violations that make garment sweatshops look like dream jobs. Pick up Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser.

A great deal of cruelty is actually common practice. Chickens routinely have their beaks and, sometimes, their feet cut off with a hot blade to prevent themfrom harming one another while packed so tightly together that they can't even move.

Even the production of organic milk and cheese often entails cruelty. Dairy cows are regularly impregnated to stimulate milk production. Their babies areusually taken from them within hours of birth. For days afterward, mother cows will bellow for their lost calves.

I ate meat and dairy products for years, and I could only do so with a clear conscience because all of the suffering and brutality it entails has beencarefully obscured from view. It is, when you look at it with fresh eyes, with a truly curious, detached sense of civility, sanity, and sterility that we walkinto modern grocery stores and purchase something so macabre as flesh without paying so much as a stray thought to the reality that the contents of our cold,shrink-wrapped package was, once, living creature. It's just "meat." Homer Simpson nailed it in characteristic fashion when he told hisvegetarian daughter, "Lisa, get a hold of yourself. This is lamb, not a lamb."


I don't expect everyone, or even most people, to give up meat - but there's no reason, biologically, let alone technologically, why we must consume animal products in today's day and age.

Often, it's rationalized away via a "might makes right" mentality. It's little wonder, then, that in our fiction we, as humans, so fearcoming into contact with alien civilizations boasting superior intellects and technology - for they could very easily justify enslaving or even eating humansunder the exact same reasoning. We, to them, would be ignorant, inferior beings. Would it matter that we can still feel pain, that we're capable offeeling a deep familial bond, that we, if given the choice, would prefer life and freedom over death and captivity? It's no surprise at all that this soterrifies people, that we would be unable to convince an invading horde of our worthiness to live - a trait we, in typically narcissistic fashion, have evendeemed our "humanity." Ironically, if a child, having been exposed to such a work of fiction, ever runs to us to express this fear, we often allaytheir concerns by reasoning, "don't worry; if they're that advanced they'd be far too civilized toever be so cruel."
 
pimp.gif
Appreciated. *looks at avy*

My dad kicked my dog yesterday for taking his shoe and I started crying and called him a jerk
indifferent.gif



So long as the hypocrisy continues its trend here in America I will reserve any and all judgement on animal cruelty. Kill a deer, its a sport its legal. kill adog its a vile act and you should be placed in Prison for it.
eyes.gif
indifferent.gif


It's interesting, because there exist varying hierarchies of life. In the US, many consider the thought of eating dog meat repugnant and find fur to be morally reprehensible, yet they have no problem eating beef and wearing leather. Bullfighting and cockfighting are considered cruel and barbaric, yet game hunting is considered a legitimate sport and slaughtering livestock has been deemed "humane."

Most people won't eat dolphins, in part, because they're considered intelligent - yet scientists have long hailed the intelligence of pigs.

You'd be hard pressed to get a consistent, logical explanation as to why, exactly, it's wrong to kill certain animals, but not others. For the most part, most people simply seem to accept the prevailing tradition without question or critical examination. By and large, we eat chicken because, as children, that's what was served to us. It tasted good and kept us alive. Yet each of us has the right and freedom to challenge that.
Tell me about it.
 
Okay entertain this...


Your going to eat that fried chicken regardless...who the hell can honestly justify the feelings of a chicken being kicked like a football before killed? Ifthat pig is beaten or not, your are going to eat that ham sandwhich, if anything the meat will be more tender.

I don't accept animal cruelty, but let's break it down.

WOULD YOU OR WOULD YOU NOT FEEL BAD FOR KILLING:
1) a rabid rat runing around your house
2) a giant spider in your pantry
3) a beetle on your bed
4) a mosquito who's suckin ya blood
5) a cow....who will fit perfectly next to ya mashed potatoes.


be honest guys.... you are eating it. don't pretend to care about it's feelings.
 
Originally Posted by l2icel3oi9i6

Originally Posted by 18key

Originally Posted by JoseBronx

that cat beating kids
smh.gif
What ever happened with that? They go to jail yet?

And yes, animal cruelty is very sickening.
laugh.gif
what ever happened to those morons?

I dont like cats either but what those morons did was just wrong, they where arrested. Heres a website dedicated to the incident http://www.kenny-glenn.net/

and about the cats

http://www.kswo.com/Globa...941020&nav=menu495_2




but damn Meth must have invented Wiki or some encyclopedia, guy should be doing my homework or something
pimp.gif
 
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited

So long as the hypocrisy continues its trend here in America I will reserve any and all judgement on animal cruelty. Kill a deer, its a sport its legal. kill a dog its a vile act and you should be placed in Prison for it.
eyes.gif
indifferent.gif

I hate hunting. I think it is ridiculous. BUT, you simply cant compare the 2 situations.

Deer are killed for food and fur and I'm pretty sure that in most states, it is illegal to shoot a deer and leave it untagged, and undressed. (Killing itjust for fun)

People do not kill dogs for food or fur. People do not go out and hunt dogs. They chain they up in their backyard and kill them.

If you catch a deer and chain it up, then beat it to death, or even starve it to death, I'm sure you would face charges. Afterall, if that dog was notchained up and being called "yours", it would not starve.

And if it is Vick you are talking about with the prison reference, people don't force deer to fight each other until death. If they did, they would go tojail also. Not to mention betting on it, body slamming them, shocking them, drowning them, and have them raped....

Besides defending yourself, under what circumstances should you kill a dog and how? I mean, afterall, you are not going to eat it, so why kill it? For"fun"? Please answer that.
 
theres dog fights, %%%* fights, special annual slaughtering of a certain animals, theres cows & pigs in slaughter houses being lifted with fork lift in areally unsafe manner. smh..
 
Originally Posted by eNPHAN

-raises hand-

i said "they're just dogs, who cares"

he's a human.

they are dogs.

life of human > life of animal

i'm not an advocate for animal abuse or nothin...

but these tree-hugging hippies get on MY LAST NERVE

some of you peta lames care more about animals than humans....

maybe because humans don't like you much...

animals are lesser than humans

we are prominent...

they are here for our use....

they leave no legacy, have no reason and can't express themselves articulately...

other than meat, what good are they anyway?

you DO know, in the wild, they are meat.......they're born....they live....and then they die....

they're just growing and growing to be eaten...

stop crying all the time.
Raising Animals as livestock is not cruelty.

Animal cruelty is when someone either tortures an animal or neglects an animal in their care, either out of absentmindedness or self interest.

How can you be defending that? Really?

Those dudes beating up the cats. It's OK because they're human and the cats are below them?
eyes.gif


If parents decided to stop feeding their child and let it starve to death would that be OK? The child is dependent on them which makes it less than them. Itcan't express itself articulately. Who cares then right?

I can't believe I just read that outlandish mess.
 
PETA has sex with animals. if u read their "manifesto" or whatever it says they look at animals as ppl and it's ok to be involved in arelationship with them.

i already know flamers will come out the woodwork on me in regards to what i just posted, but who cares. the majority of those who are quick to flamehaven't done any research on this anyway so...
 

eNPHAN wrote:
-raises hand-

i said "they're just dogs, who cares"

he's a human.

they are dogs.

life of human > life of animal

i'm not an advocate for animal abuse or nothin...

but these tree-hugging hippies get on MY LAST NERVE

some of you peta lames care more about animals than humans....

maybe because humans don't like you much...

animals are lesser than humans

we are prominent...

they are here for our use....

they leave no legacy, have no reason and can't express themselves articulately...

other than meat, what good are they anyway?

you DO know, in the wild, they are meat.......they're born....they live....and then they die....

they're just growing and growing to be eaten...

stop crying all the time. Raising Animals as livestock is not cruelty.






wow. just wow.

your mentality brings down the human species.

do you see lions trapping and torturing and abusing gazelles? no, instead they hunt and kill for survival.

humans are the dominant species, but we don't hunt and kill for suvival. we can survive without meat. but we raise and breed and abuse and torture andkill for sport.

SMH at you
 
Theres a couple things that eNPHAN posted that I do agree with, mainly how we as humans are at the top of the food chain..The Apex predator if you will..If Ihave to eat, I don't care if its Lassy..If it comes to me surviving or the dog, and I'm talking about a dire situation, the dog is getting it.

I hunt. I don't go out into the woods, maim a deer and torture it. Thats wrong..

But Ingrid Newkirk can, in so many words, go $#*@ herself. She has nothing but bad things to say about hunters and hunting, when in actuality, we're doingmore for the population than they are.

I'm not advocating animal abuse. It's not right in any sense of the word...But it really doesn't affect me to the point where I'm gonna chainmyself to a door and protest. I honestly don't care about animals that much to do that.
 
some hometown news....

NEWPORT NEWS - A Newport News police officer has been charged with two counts of animal cruelty followingcomplaints that he beat his two dogs.

According to a criminal complaint filed at General District Court, Rashad I. Brown, 32, a Newport News police officersince June 2005, admitted that he beat his dogs - a black Labrador retriever and a Boston terrier - with a hard plastic stick.

"He stated ... that it is not against the law to beat your dogs or kids in Virginia, (and that) he knows thisbecause he is a cop," said the complaint, filed by Newport News Animal Control Officer Angie Gromlich.

William S. Wise, the superintendent of animal services, said in a statement that a call came into the city's animal control division on March 8. The callersaid he or she witnessed a man kicking one of his dogs and heard him beating another at his apartment on St. Thomas Drive, in the Oyster Point area.


Upon responding to the scene, Brown encouraged his Lab, "Lilly," to act aggressively toward her, Gromlich wrote in the complaint.

First, she said, he commanded his dog in Spanish to come out of the apartment and get near the animal control officer. The dog obeyed, growling aggressively,the complaint said.

The animal control officer said she then asked Brown "several times" to confine the dog inside.

Instead, with the dog's nose only two or three inches from the animal control officer, Brown "was laughing and reinforced (the dog's) aggressivebehavior" by telling her 'Good girl, good girl," in English, the complaint said.

"Mr. Brown stated that she was doing what she was supposed to do, that he had trained her to be aggressive, and this is what he wanted her to do,"Gromlich wrote.

The animal control officer said in the complaint that she felt cornered and feared the dog would attack her.

Brown finally placed the dog inside, the complaint said. Gromlich and another animal control officer seized both animals from the property, and took them to aveterinarian.

Fresh abrasions and bruises on the dogs were "consistent with being struck by an object and kicked," Gromlichwrote.

Brown, who is a patrol officer for the Newport News Police Department, has been charged with two misdemeanor counts of animal cruelty. He is scheduled toappear in General District Court on March 26.

A woman living in the apartment, Crystal Brown, was charged with one count each of having no license for a dog and norabies vaccination, Wise said. Police spokesman Lou Thurston said that Brown, who patrols in the city's north precinct, is still on duty.

Brown could not immediately be reached for comment Wednesday afternoon.
[h4]Cops under arrest[/h4]Rashad I. Brown - charged with animal cruelty last week on an accusation that he beat his dogs - is the sixth Newport News police officer since last August to face criminal charges.

http://www.dailypress.com/news/dp-local_copcruelty_0319mar19,0,1416628.story
 
Back
Top Bottom