For those who have love for the CDP XI. If you hate them, don't post in this thread.

To be honest, I haven't seen these in person, but they look legit I'm not sure why there are complaints on the the molds. It looks like they stick outa little more in the back, but other than that, they look great. Does the material feel cheap?
 
Originally Posted by Pig Love

Originally Posted by Error on page

Originally Posted by Pig Love

I've been breaking mine in since they came out. They were uncomfortable the first few times I wore them,
but when I started tying them up a bit tighter around the ankle they started breaking in real nice. These
shoes don't hurt
laugh.gif
, they were a top 5 release last year for sure. Not that I care, but all kinds of people
see these on my feet and want to comment, kind of crazy actually.

I was at school and a janitor had on some fresh pair of fake concord XIs. I was sit'n on one of the couches in the hall and he was get'n compliments left and right, at least three while I was sit'n there. I was like those people dont have a clue and they were some of the worse fakes I have seen. so I take that comment w/ a grain of salt. I bet jb can sell people air brushed cardboard and people would be like those are
pimp.gif
.AirMichaelJordan, what jordans do you feel werent up to snuff(quality,cut,appearance etc.) and what are you comparing recent retros too, what they should be like or a chopped up version? and when should be a good time to complain about obvious flaws in the jb line, since your so upset about it. or should we just except mediocure product at an expensive price.


What are you ranting about? Seriously boss, I read ^that a few times and I don't even know what you're trying to say.
Your english is terrible. I think what I wrote was that after a few wears my shoes felt fine and how they don't hurt.
You proceed to write something about some janitor wearing fakes and everybody ooing and awwing over them
and to take comments with a grain of salt. How does that have anything to do with people saying hey "nice kicks"
to me? If you read what I wrote before you went and freaked out on my comments comment, you might have seen
the part where I wrote "NOT THAT I CARE", because I really don't. All I wanted to get across was that this
particular shoe seems to look good and thats what a lot of people think. What did you mean when you wrote
"something, something, something since your so upset about it." What did it seem that I was upset about? I even
put a little happy laughing face in one of my sentences. Cmon kid, go to class tommorow and study because the
only errors I see on this page are in your comprehension, spelling and grammar.
come on... really, you dont understand my post but you have a rebuttal for every point I made
ohwell.gif
. I will admit im not proof reading all my posts so it may not be the bestgrammar, this isnt English comp. But if you read that post a few times and didnt understand it you should be in school...really. About the shoes, you statedthat all kinds of people see them on your feet and gave props, good for you. So I said a man who cleans my school floor got just as many props for fakes, so mypoint is, dont be so quick to judge quality by other peoples standards. Cuz based on the retro sales of jb in the present day and by people who defend jb inthis thread, you would think it was 96'. 1. if you dont care why did you write it 2. if you dont care why did you respond 3. I clearly state the threadstarter by name(AirMichaelJordan) in the second half of my post, to which i am directing those questions to.
ps. if you are going to question someones comprehension, spelling and grammar your posts should be free from error.
wink.gif
 
Originally Posted by Error on page

Originally Posted by Pig Love

Originally Posted by Error on page

Originally Posted by Pig Love

I've been breaking mine in since they came out. They were uncomfortable the first few times I wore them,
but when I started tying them up a bit tighter around the ankle they started breaking in real nice. These
shoes don't hurt
laugh.gif
, they were a top 5 release last year for sure. Not that I care, but all kinds of people
see these on my feet and want to comment, kind of crazy actually.

I was at school and a janitor had on some fresh pair of fake concord XIs. I was sit'n on one of the couches in the hall and he was get'n compliments left and right, at least three while I was sit'n there. I was like those people dont have a clue and they were some of the worse fakes I have seen. so I take that comment w/ a grain of salt. I bet jb can sell people air brushed cardboard and people would be like those are
pimp.gif
.AirMichaelJordan, what jordans do you feel werent up to snuff(quality,cut,appearance etc.) and what are you comparing recent retros too, what they should be like or a chopped up version? and when should be a good time to complain about obvious flaws in the jb line, since your so upset about it. or should we just except mediocure product at an expensive price.


What are you ranting about? Seriously boss, I read ^that a few times and I don't even know what you're trying to say.
Your english is terrible. I think what I wrote was that after a few wears my shoes felt fine and how they don't hurt.
You proceed to write something about some janitor wearing fakes and everybody ooing and awwing over them
and to take comments with a grain of salt. How does that have anything to do with people saying hey "nice kicks"
to me? If you read what I wrote before you went and freaked out on my comments comment, you might have seen
the part where I wrote "NOT THAT I CARE", because I really don't. All I wanted to get across was that this
particular shoe seems to look good and thats what a lot of people think. What did you mean when you wrote
"something, something, something since your so upset about it." What did it seem that I was upset about? I even
put a little happy laughing face in one of my sentences. Cmon kid, go to class tommorow and study because the
only errors I see on this page are in your comprehension, spelling and grammar.
come on... really, you dont understand my post but you have a rebuttal for every point I made
ohwell.gif
. I will admit im not proof reading all my posts so it may not be the best grammar, this isnt English comp. But if you read that post a few times and didnt understand it you should be in school...really. About the shoes, you stated that all kinds of people see them on your feet and gave props, good for you. So I said a man who cleans my school floor got just as many props for fakes, so my point is, dont be so quick to judge quality by other peoples standards. Cuz based on the retro sales of jb in the present day and by people who defend jb in this thread, you would think it was 96'. 1. if you dont care why did you write it 2. if you dont care why did you respond 3. I clearly state the thread starter by name(AirMichaelJordan) in the second half of my post, to which i am directing those questions to.
ps. if you are going to question someones comprehension, spelling and grammar your posts should be free from error.
wink.gif
Comprehension means that you didn't even UNDERSTAND what I wrote in the first place.
wink.gif
 
^^ OR, to cut cost. Lower patent leather cut, less surface area that uses patent leather?

Early 90s, Mike told Tinker that he wants something shiny for his shoes one day.
That's the patent leather for... Shiny looking shoes. From your picture, the side patent leather is barely seen.
It kills the purpose of having patent leather. Collezione's patent leather is there just for the sake of having patent leather.

So, how's lowering down the patent leather cut makes the shoes look more sleek?
 
No were near the og's or retro's but these are cool. I just hope every 11 the release for now on aren't made the same. They went cheap on thepatent leather. like the toe box on the cdp is shorter compaired to the other 11's...Kind of sad I got rid of them, but I got the retro's so its notthat bad...lol
 
Originally Posted by indohan

^^ OR, to cut cost. Lower patent leather cut, less surface area that uses patent leather?

Early 90s, Mike told Tinker that he wants something shiny for his shoes one day.
That's the patent leather for... Shiny looking shoes. From your picture, the side patent leather is barely seen.
It kills the purpose of having patent leather. Collezione's patent leather is there just for the sake of having patent leather.

So, how's lowering down the patent leather cut makes the shoes look more sleek?

COSIGN

I rocked my CDP XIs to school today, and was getting compliments left and right, but I still feel like theyre an imitation of the real thing. On the left shoe,the part where the PL dips down, the PL is only about a centimeter and on the right its 1.5, Ive actually measured them. The back is mad low too, I would sayat least 30% less PL than the 01s!
 
Originally Posted by Pig Love

Originally Posted by Error on page

Originally Posted by Pig Love

Originally Posted by Error on page

Originally Posted by Pig Love

I've been breaking mine in since they came out. They were uncomfortable the first few times I wore them,
but when I started tying them up a bit tighter around the ankle they started breaking in real nice. These
shoes don't hurt
laugh.gif
, they were a top 5 release last year for sure. Not that I care, but all kinds of people
see these on my feet and want to comment, kind of crazy actually.

I was at school and a janitor had on some fresh pair of fake concord XIs. I was sit'n on one of the couches in the hall and he was get'n compliments left and right, at least three while I was sit'n there. I was like those people dont have a clue and they were some of the worse fakes I have seen. so I take that comment w/ a grain of salt. I bet jb can sell people air brushed cardboard and people would be like those are
pimp.gif
.AirMichaelJordan, what jordans do you feel werent up to snuff(quality,cut,appearance etc.) and what are you comparing recent retros too, what they should be like or a chopped up version? and when should be a good time to complain about obvious flaws in the jb line, since your so upset about it. or should we just except mediocure product at an expensive price.


What are you ranting about? Seriously boss, I read ^that a few times and I don't even know what you're trying to say.
Your english is terrible. I think what I wrote was that after a few wears my shoes felt fine and how they don't hurt.
You proceed to write something about some janitor wearing fakes and everybody ooing and awwing over them
and to take comments with a grain of salt. How does that have anything to do with people saying hey "nice kicks"
to me? If you read what I wrote before you went and freaked out on my comments comment, you might have seen
the part where I wrote "NOT THAT I CARE", because I really don't. All I wanted to get across was that this
particular shoe seems to look good and thats what a lot of people think. What did you mean when you wrote
"something, something, something since your so upset about it." What did it seem that I was upset about? I even
put a little happy laughing face in one of my sentences. Cmon kid, go to class tommorow and study because the
only errors I see on this page are in your comprehension, spelling and grammar.
come on... really, you dont understand my post but you have a rebuttal for every point I made
ohwell.gif
. I will admit im not proof reading all my posts so it may not be the best grammar, this isnt English comp. But if you read that post a few times and didnt understand it you should be in school...really. About the shoes, you stated that all kinds of people see them on your feet and gave props, good for you. So I said a man who cleans my school floor got just as many props for fakes, so my point is, dont be so quick to judge quality by other peoples standards. Cuz based on the retro sales of jb in the present day and by people who defend jb in this thread, you would think it was 96'. 1. if you dont care why did you write it 2. if you dont care why did you respond 3. I clearly state the thread starter by name(AirMichaelJordan) in the second half of my post, to which i am directing those questions to.
ps. if you are going to question someones comprehension, spelling and grammar your posts should be free from error.
wink.gif
Comprehension means that you didn't even UNDERSTAND what I wrote in the first place.
wink.gif
I understood completely, I commented on your quote about people like'n your shoes and how you dont care (even though the thread is aboutpeoples opinion), not how they fit. you are the one who dosent comprehend, cuz I wasnt even talk'n to you at the end of the post. and I just quoted youabout comprehension, spelling and grammar because its ironic that you judge my post but you have grammatical errors. for the last time the corolation w/ youand the janitor is he got props too and his was utterly & complety fake,even you would'nt wear'm... you know what ...you win, cdp's xi areawsome
eyes.gif
.

ps. off topic for any reading this was my post that unreadable?
 
give it up already If u dont like tha retros dont cop and stf* dam I know they are a little diffrent still a gud shoe
( let them hate and watch jordans money pile up LOL )
 
I like retros just not all of them. your right cuz if the first time the XIs came out was yesterday, people would be all over them, like people are crazy forCDP XIs today. I guess CDP XIs of today are the OG XIs for new shoeheads. Like old heads say"U dont have a clue how it use to be in the old days(insertsome year before 1998)". guess I just gotta deal wit it.
 
the taxi's are 100% more comfortable than the 11's. Still glad i got them wish i had the retro's though.
 
Originally Posted by indohan

Let me help you.

5e696x.jpg


^^ FAKES
242g9oz.jpg


^^ LEGIT.

Some of you might not understand why there are so much hatred on the Colleziones.
There are some "little" changes compared to the '01 retro. I'm not saying 01' retro is bad; it's pretty good but not perfect.
However, some little changes could make the overall shoes look uglier than ever.
Picture yourselves having a sudden pimple outbreak. Just a couple of red dots, but powerful enough to make your face look ugly.
The disgust feeling is there when I see the fakes, I mean the Colleziones.
We were all deceived when these pics above came out because as far all the ppl who bought or saw the CDP XIs we all realized that it is not thefinished product thats what I think dissapointed me the most. MY POINT IS you cant even use the pic above because the actual cdp XIs look nothing like thatthey are much worse
 
Originally Posted by sickickz23

Some just want a wearable shoe that's flawed. Others go by the motto "if it aint done right, then don't do it at all." That's me.

Like you, I wore the OG's and first wave of retroes, so I'm good passing on these wave of re-retroes. I simply just won't downgrade myself on these retroes. On the other hand Nike is currently doing it big and I'm enjoying what they're releasing for retroes. They are currently giving me that passion and excitement that strives me to buy the shoes. A feeling I lost for current JB retroes.

Cosign, it's funny to see how JB (even if it is a division of Nike) in the past 10 years lost the knowledge to excite ppl and inspirate passion due totheir so weak retroes (all the unecessary colorways, quality, fusions, etc ...), on the other hand Nike came back loud, all the ppl that feel happy or excitedwith those fake or so called CDP should buy a pair of eggplants, mcflys, kryptonates, etc ... To really feel what being in love with sneakers, being addictedto sneakers means.
 
^yall said it right.... I had to sell my used 01's (below) i miss them already... but i plan on getting a DS pair soon and im glad that i was able to helpout another fellow NTer.
happy.gif


6dc254fed9707a8e4de09a7f1f5c58c75c72651.pjpg



3c035982e5657d1facfa4b06027d7e0ec3b658a.pjpg


27d35500e26d7c16a0e8465b0c33b2d4a9abbd0.pjpg


5c635bcbe7d572eaafac42e00c3941fb398ee1e.pjpg
a8d35b0bee877ffeae594d480e800f69d5110ef.pjpg


ca73596fe63a7770a9934a340593198112663dc.pjpg


5cc35bb9e89574aba620424402697794bfc958c.pjpg
 
Pig Love... dude, in your post you say you dont understand what I typed, then I ask others is it legible, and thats hilarious to you. then, first

you defend CDP XI, then you agree w/ enyceking about being good w/ wearing the 01 XI basically say'n you can do w/out CDP XI. that tells

me your in denial now about your shoes & god knows what else in your personal life. I dont insult people online cuz I aint a fake e-thug or

punk. but homie ...you a lame.
 
Back
Top Bottom