what did people think about the nu retro?

• Jul 28, 2009

• #26

bowzer blitz

1,027

10

Joined

Jul 3, 2008

What is JB's deal with lace covers?

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #27

blue23jordan

1,803

10

Joined

Apr 28, 2008

Why is there two threads like this? ain't there a place for sneaker reviews?

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #28

da bidness

187

10

Joined

Jun 4, 2008

there ok and backthan they even went on sale on eastbay for like $60

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #29

baalnood

1,344

12

Joined

Dec 18, 2005

they ite,

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #30

ill1458

91

10

Joined

Apr 14, 2006

Not feelin them.

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #31

nikeaircobraben

1,928

10

Joined

Apr 23, 2008

lockkk please

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #32

arrjae

Banned

4,067

10

Joined

Aug 10, 2008

decent

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #33

23collector1985

446

13

Joined

Jan 24, 2005

I have the white/reds... only got them because they were $50 ... never wore them.

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #34

mst9023

1,148

17

Joined

Aug 14, 2008

never liked them but the navy ones are alright

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #35

dro 44

581

10

Joined

Jan 21, 2003

Originally Posted by TheWealth

They look like the bastardization of classic shoe.

Click to expand...

The reason I didn't cop.

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #36

eltouha

5,107

377

Joined

Dec 3, 2007

Originally Posted by RICECM

i think they were fugly

Click to expand...

yeah, the nu2's are the ugliest jordan release, aside the 18.5.

but i do like the nu1 lows.

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #37

jordan23les

1,129

41

Joined

Oct 26, 2004

never liked them

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #38

moeree5e

2,338

11

Joined

Jun 2, 2009

these were the hardest shoes to put on!

but they felt great once yougot em on....nice ballin shoes, never wore them out cuz they didnt look right with jeans

i copped em at a military base with a discount from a friend.

they didnt get alot of hate because the IIs werent out, and they were the closest thing to em....plus Nu retros were the first of their kind, so it was a mixedcrowd of haters and lovers

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #39

prettymack1989

321

10

Joined

Sep 6, 2008

i remember my boy had des when dey dropped dey was iight nun special fareal doe.

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #40

sneak jr

130

10

Joined

Mar 13, 2009

both are hot but nu retro wasnt so bad.

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #41

caddy721

319

10

Joined

Feb 23, 2008

i really liked the nu retro 1's

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #42

em in js

201

10

Joined

Jun 19, 2005

not my cup of tea

 

• Jul 28, 2009

• #43

sickickz23

8,939

5,394

Joined

Sep 7, 2005

why are you worried about what other people think?

 

• Jul 29, 2009

• #44

HankHill

5,906

3,553

Joined

Feb 23, 2006

I had the black nu retro ii's. I liked them.

 

• Jul 29, 2009

• #45

jc619er

4,703

2,599

Joined

Jun 16, 2005

They were ugly and the 2's were stupid because from what I could tell if you ever broke the laces there was no way to re-lace them because of that hideouslace cover. They were the first step towards the onslaught of ridiculous fusions that we have now.

 

• Aug 1, 2009

• #46

eltouha

5,107

377

Joined

Dec 3, 2007

Originally Posted by prettymack1989

i remember my boy had des when dey dropped dey was iight nun special fareal doe.

Click to expand...

sorry, but is that even english?

 

• Aug 1, 2009

• #47

jpena0306

470

10

Joined

May 25, 2009

these weren't that bad...they were comfortable me and my high school freshman team had them and the first shox as team shoes

 

• Aug 1, 2009

• #48

hugo

10,857

67

Joined

Oct 15, 2008

always thought they were ugly.

 

• Aug 1, 2009

• #49

jrose5

Banned

1,031

22

Joined

Dec 8, 2000

The Nu'Retro I's seemed to be more like skater shoes.




JR5

 

• Aug 1, 2009

• #50

mrnearmint

10

10

Joined

Jan 1, 2009

They all are classics and nice b/c they are jordans and we respect him but honestly I wouldn't wear them, they can't compete with Jordan Retro 3, 4,& 6's, these will always be serious heat.