Which Jordans are the easiest to keep looking new after multiple wears?

Any shoe that is black is going to take longer to look dirty or used. It also depends on how hard you are on your shoes. If you just use them casually, forwalking around, etc... then any shoe will stay looking new for a long time. Example, my 2003 white/cement retro III's still look very good and I wear thosequite a bit.
 
Originally Posted by MCCj23

For me personally, It's my black/red XIs from 2001. I've worn them at least 30 times and still no creasing, black uppers never really look dirty, the white midsoles are pretty easy to keep clean compared to the midsoles of most other jordans, and it's hard to notice oxidation (yellowing) on the red soles.

From your experience, which Jordans do you think are the easiest to keep looking new after multiple wears?
Click to expand...


I feel the same, I copped a DS pair 2 years ago and worn them at least 1nce every week or 2 and they still look like they came straight out the box. the redsole is still icy. Love them! way better than the cdp. Another good shoe is the Jordan 1's, depending what type of material is used but those hold uppretty good too.
 
2001 Black/Red XI's

2002 Flint IX's

Multiple wears yet they still look great
 
My CDP XVIII have seemed to stay perfect after about 5 wears. My Flint XII also looked DS after probably 10 wears, but I sold them awhile ago... I also justremembered my Snakeskin XI and White/Red XI lows both look flawless minus the yellowing on the sole, but the patent looks great and the uppers are fresh too
 
the jordans i dont wear are the most easiest to keep looking new


























the jordan XII's and Red/Black XI's
 
Originally Posted by NJstress03

I think any black based 8's
Click to expand...


both the og and the retros have the problem where the strap would wear down real quick so that "air jordan" would turn white. and the solesdisintegrate after a while.
i've also worn to death both og and retro VI's, so definitely not them. i also disagree with the fire red III's comment, the paint on those chippedreally fast.

the best tanks i've ever owned are the black/red '02 VII's. not only i've worn them countless, and i do mean A LOT, of times, they'vehardly faded and the soles are still perfectly in tact. they never wear down, i don't understand how they can do this.

even my OG black/red XI's got really beaten after several years. can't wait to get my '02s delivered.
 
I'd say any shoe that doesn't have nubuck because it gets dirty really easy (at least for me), other than that all my shoes seem to look the same aftergetting worn.
 
I will have to vote for the b/red XI's as well. I knew there were some reasons I held my XI's a little more dear than the rest of the collection.

The SJ's held up fairly well, too.
 
BRED XI's and any XII's non CDP of course... I think the CDP's are meant to display not wear.
 
My fire red III's were indestructable for about a year of regular wear, maybe more, but I've had them for a while now and they're absolutely beat.Other than that, I think black/red XII's win as one of the most indestructable Jordans, but I don't think the flu game joints are gonna be the sameway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom