NT's Love For Women Built Like Little Boys

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

just outta curiousity....
you will pass up a pretty much decent woman because she doesn't have an #$$/*******?
( last i checked you couldnt make/grow them if you werent blessed with them)

Click to expand...

LOL And what if the answer is YES. Does that make us a bad person? People pass up others because of LACK of physicality all of the time. I can't believe you even asked this question as if the external shouldn't be factored into the equation

Click to expand...

I don't really agree with these dudes for the most part but, yeah that was kind of a dumb question

It happens quite a lot

Click to expand...

so if i pass you up because your penis is too small thats okay right? cuz you cant control that......right?

*shrugs*

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

just outta curiousity....
you will pass up a pretty much decent woman because she doesn't have an #$$/*******?
( last i checked you couldnt make/grow them if you werent blessed with them)

Click to expand...

LOL And what if the answer is YES. Does that make us a bad person? People pass up others because of LACK of physicality all of the time. I can't believe you even asked this question as if the external shouldn't be factored into the equation

Click to expand...

I don't really agree with these dudes for the most part but, yeah that was kind of a dumb question

It happens quite a lot

Click to expand...

so if i pass you up because your penis is too small thats okay right? cuz you cant control that......right?

*shrugs*

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by SuperAntigen

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

Originally Posted by REDd SPYDER

most of yall dudes here haven't smashed both sides of this fence yet..but thick chicks that jiggle > skinny chicks with no body.. aint nuffin like doggy wit a chick that got a booty clappin back at yuu

Click to expand...

skinny chicks ridin you > thick chicks



"I be like chill $#+@@ you hurtin my thighs"

Click to expand...

So that's why you prefer the type of females you do...

Not because there's actually anything wrong with these "fully-developed" females, but rather, the fact that you're too weak of man to control that kitty/*** while she's riding you..

I mean seriously--what real MAN actually tells a chick "you're hurting my thighs"...during sex...

...

...

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

just outta curiousity....
you will pass up a pretty much decent woman because she doesn't have an #$$/*******?
( last i checked you couldnt make/grow them if you werent blessed with them)

Click to expand...

LOL And what if the answer is YES. Does that make us a bad person? People pass up others because of LACK of physicality all of the time. I can't believe you even asked this question as if the external shouldn't be factored into the equation

Click to expand...

I don't really agree with these dudes for the most part but, yeah that was kind of a dumb question

It happens quite a lot

Click to expand...

so if i pass you up because your penis is too small thats okay right? cuz you cant control that......right?

*shrugs*

Click to expand...

only reason that doesn't work is cuz you would have to get sexed first...by then who cares...he already had you

its like passing a guy up cuz he's short or can't dress or something...

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by LDJ

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

First off, you're comparing cognitive development to physical development. Once you're body stops growing, you are fully developed, regardless of what the average is. Take for example the fact that many European countries such as Scandinavia have much higher average heights than the United states. So does that mean that a 5'10, 180 dude in the US is underdeveloped compared to a Scandinavian? No. You just sound stupid so stop. You keep saying "average" and "national level" as if that speaks for all people, and it doesn't. Maybe your bubble is so small that you can just generalize but I try not to lump people into groups. That's just me though...

Click to expand...

ok the same goes for your brain, so wat r u sayin. and as far as height weight it isnt a usa thing the stats were based on the human species, the results just happen 2 be founded in the usa, so wat does scandinavia have 2 do with a difference in human species. by ur definition thats like sayin ok a pitbull average weight is for full development should be in the range of 55-80 lbs(i breed them so i know) and height is 22-28in.

where u breed the dog or where u live have nuttin 2 do with that fact. ur basically sayin if one person breeded a dog in usa,another in china, and 1 in africa, the full development of the pitbull should be diff. and that is stupid. if ur dog is 14in and 32lbs he is under-developed period. it doesnt matter where u raised him where the dog origins r 4rm.

he isnt at the level a full grown pitbull should be. regardless if u find him cute, he is smart, ur kids love him none of that %!% matters.

Click to expand...

Now you're comparing human development to breeding pitbulls? Seriously? How can a study on the human species as a whole be conducted in one country? I've done plenty research studies so I know a thing or two about sample bias, you clearly do not. Your opinion is your opinion and I can't knock that, but don't try to back it up with contrived science on yoru part like breeding pitbulls. Averages are just that; averages. They are not the benchmark for proper development. So by you're reasoning Manny Paquiao, Miguel Cotto, Nate Robinson, Floyd Maewether are all underdeveloped? And they're all pedophiles? Do you realize how dumb your reasoning is?

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by DR813


why is this even 14 pages long? to me this whole arguement is petty. people have their preferences. no matter how odd or different they may seem to you, it's their personal choice. and I think some of you on here are trying to force your own preference on other people, like your women preferences are what every man's preference should be, and it doesn't work that way. me personally, at the end of the day, we should just all accept and share our views and opinions, rather than bash other people's opinions because they are different from yours.

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

glad i dont have to deal with fitting none of these standards

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Forgot About Jae

Originally Posted by SuperAntigen

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

Originally Posted by REDd SPYDER

most of yall dudes here haven't smashed both sides of this fence yet..but thick chicks that jiggle > skinny chicks with no body.. aint nuffin like doggy wit a chick that got a booty clappin back at yuu

Click to expand...

skinny chicks ridin you > thick chicks



"I be like chill $#+@@ you hurtin my thighs"

Click to expand...

So that's why you prefer the type of females you do...

Not because there's actually anything wrong with these "fully-developed" females, but rather, the fact that you're too weak of man to control that kitty/*** while she's riding you..

I mean seriously--what real MAN actually tells a chick "you're hurting my thighs"...during sex...

...

...

Click to expand...

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

relax babygirl...

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by SuperAntigen

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

Originally Posted by REDd SPYDER

most of yall dudes here haven't smashed both sides of this fence yet..but thick chicks that jiggle > skinny chicks with no body.. aint nuffin like doggy wit a chick that got a booty clappin back at yuu

Click to expand...

skinny chicks ridin you > thick chicks



"I be like chill $#+@@ you hurtin my thighs"

Click to expand...

So that's why you prefer the type of females you do...

Not because there's actually anything wrong with these "fully-developed" females, but rather, the fact that you're too weak of man to control that kitty/*** while she's riding you..

I mean seriously--what real MAN actually tells a chick "you're hurting my thighs"...during sex...

...

...

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by LDJ


this dude probably was in the thread cryin about marley and me. i say nt should donate the money we raised 2 feed this dude. u must be 1 of those 3rd world country nters we have posting(i see my 75 cent a day isnt gettin used 2 its full potential). u should use less money on lotion n more on food.

at a dude ballin up cryin.... ah baby my thighs r hurtin, u crushin my wee-wee. like wat dude says that.

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

I never said I told a girl that

Thats what I be thinking

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

relax babygirl...

Click to expand...

im good. id rather a real discussion than what i usually see in here. i like conversation over insults for opposing arguments though. carry on

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

glad i dont have to deal with fitting none of these standards

Click to expand...

you not even considered thick tho

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

Originally Posted by LDJ


this dude probably was in the thread cryin about marley and me. i say nt should donate the money we raised 2 feed this dude. u must be 1 of those 3rd world country nters we have posting(i see my 75 cent a day isnt gettin used 2 its full potential). u should use less money on lotion n more on food.

at a dude ballin up cryin.... ah baby my thighs r hurtin, u crushin my wee-wee. like wat dude says that.

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Phil Le0tard0

I never said I told a girl that

Thats what I be thinking

Click to expand...

so yea...no

yeaaaa .....uhhhh...... idk what marley and me is

btw im 5'10 180

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by LDJ

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by LDJ

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

First off, you're comparing cognitive development to physical development. Once you're body stops growing, you are fully developed, regardless of what the average is. Take for example the fact that many European countries such as Scandinavia have much higher average heights than the United states. So does that mean that a 5'10, 180 dude in the US is underdeveloped compared to a Scandinavian? No. You just sound stupid so stop. You keep saying "average" and "national level" as if that speaks for all people, and it doesn't. Maybe your bubble is so small that you can just generalize but I try not to lump people into groups. That's just me though...

Click to expand...

ok the same goes for your brain, so wat r u sayin. and as far as height weight it isnt a usa thing the stats were based on the human species, the results just happen 2 be founded in the usa, so wat does scandinavia have 2 do with a difference in human species. by ur definition thats like sayin ok a pitbull average weight is for full development should be in the range of 55-80 lbs(i breed them so i know) and height is 22-28in.

where u breed the dog or where u live have nuttin 2 do with that fact. ur basically sayin if one person breeded a dog in usa,another in china, and 1 in africa, the full development of the pitbull should be diff. and that is stupid. if ur dog is 14in and 32lbs he is under-developed period. it doesnt matter where u raised him where the dog origins r 4rm.

he isnt at the level a full grown pitbull should be. regardless if u find him cute, he is smart, ur kids love him none of that %!% matters.

Click to expand...

Now you're comparing human development to breeding pitbulls? Seriously? How can a study on the human species as a whole be conducted in one country? I've done plenty research studies so I know a thing or two about sample bias, you clearly do not. Your opinion is your opinion and I can't knock that, but don't try to back it up with contrived science on yoru part like breeding pitbulls. Averages are just that; averages. They are not the benchmark for proper development. So by you're reasoning Manny Paquiao, Miguel Cotto, Nate Robinson, Floyd Maewether are all underdeveloped? And they're all pedophiles? Do you realize how dumb your reasoning is?

Click to expand...

no it maybe bias cause it doesnt go along with ur punky brewster fetish. n wat does a male size have 2 do with a male being a pedophile. the stats were of wat a fully develop human size should be. no different then what a fully develop bird should be, or any other creature for that mature. the stats were on CDC more reputable then u r. im pretty sure the study was based on human species period. not just based on humans in the usa. so if a cheetah fully developed speed is 60mph and there is 1 that runs 15 mph. r u saying oh he isnt slow all the rest of them are just super fast?

same way they do national averages etc for education and say such and such state at 5th grade read comprehend at 2nd grade level. does that mean they are slower less developed then wat they should be yes. if stats etc didnt matter y would they have em? u can be 5'0 200 lbs and healthy that doesnt mean u reached where the human species is at average in terms of size and height.

Like i said u can rape... oops sleep with all the 14/15 y/o u like or my bad all the woman who have the body type of 14/15 y/o u like(whateva floats the mindset of a pedobear boat) but at the end of the day by the age of 13/14 a normal average build of a human woman is 5'3 115lbs large a/small b cup, and ur woman at 26 is 5'0 98lbs small a cup. she is under the normal average size of a fully developed human woman period.

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by SweetBabyRAE

Originally Posted by mytmouse76

relax babygirl...

Click to expand...

im good. id rather a real discussion than what i usually see in here. i like conversation over insults for opposing arguments though. carry on

Click to expand...

Nice way to play it off

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by airforce416

some of yall would really pass on the chick above over some tiny body chicks?

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by LDJ

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

Originally Posted by LDJ

Originally Posted by keithsweatsjordans

First off, you're comparing cognitive development to physical development. Once you're body stops growing, you are fully developed, regardless of what the average is. Take for example the fact that many European countries such as Scandinavia have much higher average heights than the United states. So does that mean that a 5'10, 180 dude in the US is underdeveloped compared to a Scandinavian? No. You just sound stupid so stop. You keep saying "average" and "national level" as if that speaks for all people, and it doesn't. Maybe your bubble is so small that you can just generalize but I try not to lump people into groups. That's just me though...

Click to expand...

ok the same goes for your brain, so wat r u sayin. and as far as height weight it isnt a usa thing the stats were based on the human species, the results just happen 2 be founded in the usa, so wat does scandinavia have 2 do with a difference in human species. by ur definition thats like sayin ok a pitbull average weight is for full development should be in the range of 55-80 lbs(i breed them so i know) and height is 22-28in.

where u breed the dog or where u live have nuttin 2 do with that fact. ur basically sayin if one person breeded a dog in usa,another in china, and 1 in africa, the full development of the pitbull should be diff. and that is stupid. if ur dog is 14in and 32lbs he is under-developed period. it doesnt matter where u raised him where the dog origins r 4rm.

he isnt at the level a full grown pitbull should be. regardless if u find him cute, he is smart, ur kids love him none of that %!% matters.

Click to expand...

Now you're comparing human development to breeding pitbulls? Seriously? How can a study on the human species as a whole be conducted in one country? I've done plenty research studies so I know a thing or two about sample bias, you clearly do not. Your opinion is your opinion and I can't knock that, but don't try to back it up with contrived science on yoru part like breeding pitbulls. Averages are just that; averages. They are not the benchmark for proper development. So by you're reasoning Manny Paquiao, Miguel Cotto, Nate Robinson, Floyd Maewether are all underdeveloped? And they're all pedophiles? Do you realize how dumb your reasoning is?

Click to expand...

no it maybe bias cause it doesnt go along with ur punky brewster fetish. n wat does a male size have 2 do with a male being a pedophile. the stats were of wat a fully develop human size should be. no different then what a fully develop bird should be, or any other creature for that mature. the stats were on CDC more reputable then u r. im pretty sure the study was based on human species period. not just based on humans in the usa. so if a cheetah fully developed speed is 60mph and there is 1 that runs 15 mph. r u saying oh he isnt slow all the rest of them are just super fast?

same way they do national averages etc for education and say such and such state at 5th grade read comprehend at 2nd grade level. does that mean they are slower less developed then wat they should be yes. if stats etc didnt matter y would they have em? u can be 5'0 200 lbs and healthy that doesnt mean u reached where the human species is at average in terms of size and height.

Like i said u can rape... oops sleep with all the 14/15 y/o u like or my bad all the woman who have the body type of 14/15 y/o u like(whateva floats the mindset of a pedobear boat) but at the end of the day by the age of 13/14 a normal average build of a human woman is 5'3 115lbs large a/small b cup, and ur woman at 26 is 5'0 98lbs small a cup. she is under the normal average size of a fully developed human woman period.

Click to expand...

If you honestly believe that every guy who sleeps with a girl under the national average of height/weight is secretly a pedophile then I simply can't reason with you. I mean, God forbid, a dude likes an ADULT female because of her personality. Obviously, we should all just walk around with measuring sticks to make sure she passes pedophile inspection. People like you shouldn't even be allowed to reproduce. Your poor daughter.....

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Crank Lucas

Originally Posted by airforce416

some of yall would really pass on the chick above over some tiny body chicks?

Click to expand...

easily, Ill take mila kunis,anne hathaway,vanessa simmons,taylor swift,rashida jones,vanessa hudgens over this ANYDAY

>

you youngins still on that "she needa have a overly out of shape butt" phase, Im lookin at that + more, vanessa over that

EASY

Click to expand...

Originally Posted by Crank Lucas

Originally Posted by airforce416

some of yall would really pass on the chick above over some tiny body chicks?

Click to expand...

easily, Ill take mila kunis,anne hathaway,vanessa simmons,taylor swift,rashida jones,vanessa hudgens over this ANYDAY

>

you youngins still on that "she needa have a overly out of shape butt" phase, Im lookin at that + more, vanessa over that

EASY

Click to expand...