News On Future Films Based on Comics/Paranormal/Sci-Fi

Don't be fooled, the title means nothing. Avengers: Age of Ultron is not gonna have much to do with he comic book event. It may have a scenario where Ultron takes over the world or even some time travel elements but Marvel Studios isn't just lacking the key cast members and others to develop but it's doing way too much for the 2nd Avengers film.

This movie is probably gonna take elements from every Ultron story like Ultron Unlimited along with some originality from Whedon.
Rell826 said:
Personally, it doesn't make sense for GotG to come before the member of the Avengers who played a role in creating their one of their villains especially if said villain is going to be in the next film. Is Pym going to be in Avengers 2?
Click to expand...
Why doesn't it make sense? It's pretty much a gift that there's even going to be an Ant Man film. If they wanted they could just make Tony create Ultron or as said have it evolve from computer Jarvis.

Pym will probably show up in Avengers 2 though.

GotG is releasing first cuz that'll further develop the cosmic side of things for when things come to a head in Avengers 3 with Thanos. It'll most likely have the GotG in it along with the other heroes for the movies from phase 3.
100PROOF said:
CP1708 said:
Batman/Superman 2015

Flash 2016

Justice League 2017


I can get behind that.


Meanwhile, Marvel will be in phase 3.
Click to expand...


why are they only making one movie a year? Flash should be replaced w/ a Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman movie and roll right into justice league
Click to expand...
:lol: How you gonna ask why they only doing one movie a year and then say they should replace one of the movies. They should just release Flash and another film that year. A Supes/Bats/WW film would benefit WW the most though, doubt they do it. Might as well just do JL. Too transparent to do that film instead of solos.
 
Last edited:
lamekilla said:
Don't know in what "realistic" setting in which superman would need batman's help. MoS made him look invisible. DC is in full on panic mode right now. I can only imagine how furious fans will be when kryptonite pops outta nowhere in that film lol
Click to expand...

How does JLA exist in the comics?

Why does Thor need the Avengers when most here would say he can beat Superman? If so, he is stronger and should be able to beat anyone because Superman apparently could, right?

It's all in the villain and how the story is written.



I'll give you a scenario on why Batman would meet up with Superman though:


When Goyer was asked whether or not he was surprised about the backlash surrounding Superman breaking General Zod's neck at the end of Man of Steel, he replied:

"To a certain extent, Superman, cinematically, hadn't been reinvented since the Donner films. We will be dealing it with the coming film. He's not fully formed in [Man of Steel]. He will have to deal with the repercussions in the next film."
Click to expand...


Maybe the death of Zod and the destruction of Metropolis forced Batman to confront Superman, maybe he is that repercussion? Or when a new villain arises in Metropolis, Superman is more hesitant to fight due to destruction of the city or the chance he might kill again so Bruce/Bats is the one who helps him out to deal with that?



I don't know why DC would be in full panic when MoS still made $630mil and still going despite the bad reviews. They aren't exactly trying to steal Marvels audience right now because people will see both a Marvel and DC film anyways, they are just trying to make a new franchise that sticks and people would see.

Superman just gets no respect, they finally plan to make a Superman/Batman film that most want that will lead to a JLA film which everybody wants and now there is no situation where Superman would need help? :lol:
 
Last edited:
Rell826 said:
Why is SDCC so much better than NYCC? It seems like NY gets the leftovers compared to what San Diego gets.
Click to expand...
That's a matter of opinion.

For years now, basically since NYCC started SDCC has become more of a media convention than a comics convention despite the title. If you want the exclusive comics news you wait for NYCC, all the video game and movie stuff you head to SDCC. Marvel and DC have consistently announced their comics news before SDCC even starts so they just talk about that when the con starts and don't announce anything new. The movies and the video games basically dominate the SDCC now.

Plus NYCC is more new than SDCC. NY being the mecca and capital of all things and media market really doesn't play in to it. East coast comic fans are pretty lucky to even get a NYCC.
Tradition or not, its silly to cut out a portion of the market because it hasn't ran as long and the numbers aren't big. They still spend money too. Last time I checked, no movies got premiered in San Diego.
Click to expand...
This doesn't make sense. If the numbers aren't as big they're not making enough money for more studios to come and promote. They spend money to do it but not as much as SD does. To be simple, it's basic supply and demand. The demand is not as big in NY so there's not a lot of factions supplying, especially when they just did it in SDCC.

It all ends up online anyway. To me it gives all of the comic companies to announce other new **** they got coming down the pipeline for next year. Plus you know, focus on comics.
 
Last edited:
Serious, Superman is like LeBron at this point.

No matter what they do, fools ***** about it.
"He only wears glasses as a disguise".
"He saved the world, but he destroyed a city."
"Why don't we see the Daily ******g Planet more?"
"Why is Jimmy, Jenny?"

Now we get something we've all long wanted, and people are already complaining, minute one. No previews, no casting, nothing. A year, a creative team, and one returning actor, people already crying about it. :smh:

People just be *****ing to *****. Least let a damn trailer come out before you start complaining. Otherwise go focus on other movies that you find "better"
 
CP1708 said:
Serious, Superman is like LeBron at this point.

No matter what they do, fools ***** about it.
"He only wears glasses as a disguise".
"He saved the world, but he destroyed a city."
"Why don't we see the Daily ******g Planet more?"
"Why is Jimmy, Jenny?"

Now we get something we've all long wanted, and people are already complaining, minute one. No previews, no casting, nothing. A year, a creative team, and one returning actor, people already crying about it. :smh:

People just be *****ing to *****. Least let a damn trailer come out before you start complaining. Otherwise go focus on other movies that you find "better"
Click to expand...

Interesting analogy CP. On point.

It would really be interesting on what kind of Batman they go for in this reboot. If it's the paranoid Batman (think Tower of Babel), I'm all for it.
 
i think most of the negativity is coming from marvel fanboys and people who just hate dc comics or superman in general.

people just need to chill and let **** get done.
 
I've been advocating for a worlds finest film as well but everything just seems rushed. Are you telling me that by 2015 we're gonna have a new batman AND a sequel to superman? Oh and wait we're not using a returning actor for batman we're casting a new one....and this batman is not gonna be based off of the recently popular trilogy it's gonna be a complete reboot. So who's coming back seriously? I don't even see any room for Lois lane in this movie. Their best bet would be to film a MoS 2 film and a worlds strongest concurrently and have them connected in a way, maybe even release a year apart from each other smh











Meanwhile hank pym is building Ultron :x
 
We can agree to disagree.

Superman = LeBron? The movie wasn't good. It's as simple as that. People are questioning the move because it shows a bit of desperation on DC and Warner Bros part to include Batman in the movie. Do they not have faith in Superman being able to hold his own in two more movies? Also, it goes back to the poor planning by Warner Bros and their attempt to play catch up with Marvel.

I don't have a problem with Batman being rebooted in this universe. Superman wouldn't have existed in the universe the Batman trilogy took place in which is why I wasn't a big fan of Nolans interpretation. The supernatural element is present in the Batman mythos.
 
Last edited:
I think it's a lack of faith...

I have no interest in seeing the MOS in theaters...but that's never been the case with a Batman film. 
 
Last edited:
Rell826 said:
We can agree to disagree.

Superman = LeBron? The movie wasn't good. It's as simple as that. People are questioning the move because it shows a bit of desperation on DC and Warner Bros part to include Batman in the movie. Do they not have faith in Superman being able to hold his own in two more movies? Also, it goes back to the poor planning by Warner Bros and their attempt to play catch up with Marvel.

I don't have a problem with Batman being rebooted in this universe. Superman wouldn't have existed in the universe the Batman trilogy took place in which is why I wasn't a big fan of Nolans interpretation. The supernatural element is present in the Batman mythos.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY!

Batman just came off of a multi-billion dollar trilogy. Superman can't even get a sequel without the dark knight involved and then they're trying to elude to a dark knight returns type story line?? Lmao isn't this suppose to be a superman sequel??!?? WB hitting all types of panic buttons







Meanwhile, I keep daydreaming about a hulk vs Ultron fight :x
 
Last edited:
From the description of Robocop, it sounds like its going to be just like the Total Recall reboot; bland and sapped of its original quirkiness. He doesn't get killed in the line of duty. He is wounded by an IED in Iran and badly burned.
 
Just please throw a number at Bale he can't refuse...I loved him as Bruce and he was a decent Bats.
 
Rell826 said:
From the description of Robocop, it sounds like its going to be just like the Total Recall reboot; bland and sapped of its original quirkiness. He doesn't get killed in the line of duty. He is wounded by an IED in Iran and badly burned.
Click to expand...

THAT WOULD SUCK!!!!!

The best part about Robocop is sadly how he is murdered and then brought back as this machine who still is conflicted wth Murphy's memories of his wife and life...GTHO!!...if they are doing Robocop, just stick to the OG otherwise this would be as generic a movie as a ever...with a dude in a robot suit...
 
No, its not "that simple". The movie was thee best Superman film ever made, so if you're saying that they all sucked, then fine, sure it wasn't TDK, but that can't be held against it, TDK was just that special.

WB surely has sucked from a planning standpoint. Zero argument there. But this isn't simply a panic move, Supes is gonna hit 700 million overall, I doubt a sequel would be a problem. The bottom line is this way they can tie a sequel, as well as bring in Bat and head towards JL within a 4 year span. Otherwise they'd need to reboot Bat, still have a Supes sequel, try to introduce Flash then pull off JL.

Just because YOU didn't like the movie doesn't make it trash. You've done nothing but complain about every damn thing, including already whining about a movie that's barely been announced and nothing else. That's just crying for the sake of crying.

So yes, Supes = Bron. He can't win a title. Wins a title.
Well he had to have help.
He can't hit game winners. He hits a game winner. But it was a layup. He can't hit jumpers when it matters.
So he hits jumpers. Well, he didn't have anyone guarding him when he shot it.

On and on. Nobody ever steps back and says ****, why we nitpickin this dude? Just enjoy the moments.
Thats where MOS is at. Dudes like you complainin there wasn't enough Clark. :smh:
Not enough Daily Planet.
Not enough Perry White.
I don't understand why this happened, or that happened, and on and on and on. Yet this film gave us WAAAAAAAY more depth than any of the Donner films ever did, helluva lot more than 06 did and gave us some really unique takes on the character building of who Clark Kent is and will be going forward.

But yeah, Jennie Olsen couldn't hit a jumper with a hand in her face..... :l
 
lamekilla said:
Rell826 said:
We can agree to disagree.

Superman = LeBron? The movie wasn't good. It's as simple as that. People are questioning the move because it shows a bit of desperation on DC and Warner Bros part to include Batman in the movie. Do they not have faith in Superman being able to hold his own in two more movies? Also, it goes back to the poor planning by Warner Bros and their attempt to play catch up with Marvel.

I don't have a problem with Batman being rebooted in this universe. Superman wouldn't have existed in the universe the Batman trilogy took place in which is why I wasn't a big fan of Nolans interpretation. The supernatural element is present in the Batman mythos.
Click to expand...

EXACTLY!

Batman just came off of a multi-billion dollar trilogy. Superman can't even get a sequel without the dark knight involved and then they're trying to elude to a dark knight returns type story line?? Lmao isn't this suppose to be a superman sequel??!?? WB hitting all types of panic buttons
Click to expand...


How about we wait it out? This next film is really sounding like a Superman film with Batman on it instead of a full blown Supes/Bats film. You guys are just judging too much and never have faith in WB. They brought you Nolans Batman trilogy and loved it (well most did) and their next foray is MoS and whether you hate it or love it, it made $630mil worldwide so far. Cinemascore is A- on it so the critics may have not liked it (mostly because it wasn't Reeves playing Clark) but the movie was a success and majority of people I know loved and enjoyed it.

It is no rush to put Bats in there, he is a fan favorite and people have been going crazy for more and now that they add him people say it's too soon? Do you really want another origin story for him? Everyone know who and what Batman stands for by now, he can show up in any films w/o introduction and know what he is capable of and are aware of his characteristics so he would fit in just fine in that film.

DC is actually planning this thing out now, a month or so ago, it was reported they were rushing a MoS sequel for 2014 and make a JLA film for 2015, they slowed that down and decided to make the next film in 2015 and yeah it is rumored for a Flash in 2016 and JLA for 2017 but until confirmed, that is just a rumor. All we have and are getting for sure if a Superman sequel with Batman in it and trust me, this movie will sell like crazy. These two are the #1 & #2 comic book heroes in the world and combining them just makes sense. Again it could work if Bats arrival is a result of Supermans destruction of Metropolis and death of Zod, read those comments Goyer and you can see it'll move Supermans development along. PLus if Flash makes a cameo anywhere in the film or at the end, people would go nuts.



I've been advocating for a worlds finest film as well but everything just seems rushed. Are you telling me that by 2015 we're gonna have a new batman AND a sequel to superman? Oh and wait we're not using a returning actor for batman we're casting a new one....and this batman is not gonna be based off of the recently popular trilogy it's gonna be a complete reboot. So who's coming back seriously? I don't even see any room for Lois lane in this movie. Their best bet would be to film a MoS 2 film and a worlds strongest concurrently and have them connected in a way, maybe even release a year apart from each other smh
Click to expand...

For a comic book fan, you really have no imagination. If they use a new actor for Batman, you really can't separate him from Bale? You won't be able to comprehend that it is a new Batman and that his characteristics are the one we know from the comic? You can't see how Lois can fit int he film when the story is wide open right now? Really? We have no plot or anything and you can't picture Lois in the film? Then again you couldn't imagine how Bats could help Superman so I am not surprised you can't see any other possibilities with other characters.


And yes Lois is confirmed to be back and FIshburne and Lane.

The current hit, “Man of Steel,” has taken in more than $630 million at the worldwide box office to date, and climbing. Along with its star, Henry Cavill, the upcomingfilm brings back Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne and Diane Lane. The new Batman has yet to be cast.
Click to expand...
 
No. superman was trash. Action, CGI, was amazing. Too many holes. Bad pacing, didnt really develop Clark. Should of had a linear story and not dealt with Flashbacks, Lois and Clark's relationship was horribly forced. Trying to introduce Jenny, why should she get that much screen time when nothing was explained about her.
A lot more
 
I'm glad you've been following my posts to know I've been crying about everything. How about hopping off my **** for a minute and remove whatever attachment you have for the Superman seties and look at it from a non biased viewpoint. Beyond the issue of Superman not being Superman, critics killed the movie as well as a number of people on social networking sites. Are they crying too? The movie had no focus. It was literally all over the place. Superman Returns was more cohesive than Hack Snyder's vision. Returns would easily be the better film if it had a better script.
 
ksteezy said:
THAT WOULD SUCK!!!!!

The best part about Robocop is sadly how he is murdered and then brought back as this machine who still is conflicted wth Murphy's memories of his wife and life...GTHO!!...if they are doing Robocop, just stick to the OG otherwise this would be as generic a movie as a ever...with a dude in a robot suit...
Click to expand...

QFT!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom