Eh, cool, w/e. Best thing I see here is an excellent actor like Douglas being apart of this. Hopefully, the writing is up to par to show off his skills and talent. I'm on record saying I don't really give a **** about Ant-Man no matter who it ends up being. I like Eric O'Grady but Marvel isn't releasing a R rated Ant-Man movie so I never got my hopes up but even then it's not like anything was great about the character. Plus there's nothing all that amazing about Ant-Man's powers. It's the same thing with a character whose only special ability is flight.
Best thing Pym is known for is being a wife beater and creating Ultron, don't see a problem with stripping him with one of them. Lang is the reformed thief/single parent and other than that he's pretty bland. O'Grady at least a fleshed out personality only thing is he's a scum bag and there's no way he gets a stright up superhero movie unless they change all that to make him some foul mouthed hero looking for redemption.
As mentioned before, this just gives a chance for ppl to become fans of Ant-Man whoever it is.
Originally Posted by sunshineblotters
So not only are they giving Ant-Man an underserved movie, it's not even the Ant-Man that people like?
@ Ant-Man ppl like. What world are you living in?
Ant-Man isn't some huge fan favorite, he's barely B-list.
Atom Ant got more fans than Ant-Man.
IMO neither are worthy of a movie. Don't care who was an avenger before who. They shouldve just had Pym and Tony be science bros (since they cant use Reed) while Tony and Banner are argue and Tony tries to provoke Banner. That way they could depict Hulk a LOT better.
None of this really matters though or are compelling reasons to do it that way. You're basically saying just make it Pym so it can be Pym. Science bros thing isn't that important and it was pulled off well enough with Banner while he still got to provoke him.
Marvel ****** up chances with Hulk when they couldn't bring Norton back