Fools Wildin Thinking They Doing It Unappreciation Vol Get The @#*+ out

This guy put holes on his cheeks?
laugh.gif
"mom you just dont understand, this is who I am"
 
700

.
So ya'll just gonna keep it a secret then huh...
First game there was evidence that he had a foreign substance on his hand. he said it was dirt but everyone knew it was pinetard ... today he was pitching and the joint was now on his neck ... clear as day. sure enough umpire verify and he got toss
 
Last edited:
what I don't get is..if catchers have pine tar on their shin guards..the pitcher is bound to come in contact with it so whats the issue?
 
what I don't get is..if catchers have pine tar on their shin guards..the pitcher is bound to come in contact with it so whats the issue?
don't even knew whats the benefit? better grip? so why is it legal for batters to use it? oh better grip ... hmmmm
 
nahhhh
indifferent.gif


Im asking if catchers are allowed to have lil bit on their shin guards and they put it on the ball..whats wrong with pitchers doing it?
 
what I don't get is..if catchers have pine tar on their shin guards..the pitcher is bound to come in contact with it so whats the issue?
don't even knew whats the benefit? better grip? so why is it legal for batters to use it? oh better grip ... hmmmm

Pine tar gives more grip. Useful on a cold/windy night like tonights game. The reason pine tar is not allowed on the pitcher is because the rule book states "no foreign substance"
So in essence MLB wrongly lumps pine tar in the same category as vaseline or spit. Pine tar is more like rosin, which is allowed to help dry the pitchers hand


nahhhh :stoneface:

Im asking if catchers are allowed to have lil bit on their shin guards and they put it on the ball..whats wrong with pitchers doing it?

Ive never heard of catchers having pine tar on their shinguards. But even if they did the ump would probably remove the ball from play if he found any substance on the ball
 
Pine tar gives more grip. Useful on a cold/windy night like tonights game. The reason pine tar is not allowed on the pitcher is because the rule book states "no foreign substance"
So in essence MLB wrongly lumps pine tar in the same category as vaseline or spit. Pine tar is more like rosin, which is allowed to help dry the pitchers hand



Ive never heard of catchers having pine tar on their shinguards. But even if they did the ump would probably remove the ball from play if he found any substance on the ball
I know this ... I'm just saying what others in baseball to include baseball players, they don't care. they rather have a pitcher throwing 95 to have full control of thebaseball by using pinetar than not use pinetar and lose control and hit them on their head.
 
Pine tar gives more grip. Useful on a cold/windy night like tonights game. The reason pine tar is not allowed on the pitcher is because the rule book states "no foreign substance"
So in essence MLB wrongly lumps pine tar in the same category as vaseline or spit. Pine tar is more like rosin, which is allowed to help dry the pitchers hand



Ive never heard of catchers having pine tar on their shinguards. But even if they did the ump would probably remove the ball from play if he found any substance on the ball
good look for clearing that up but yea catchers are allowed a little "strip" of pine tar on their shin guards

"Now that I've told you how to scuff, the question becomes: How much can players get away with in their own clubhouses? It's funny; pine tar is no big deal to players. Everybody uses pine tar. Catchers put in on their shinguards. Infielders put it in the pockets of their gloves so the ball will stick in there. It's almost a basic part of the game. Sandpaper and Vaseline, however, are looked at as cheating. They give pitchers too much of an advantage."
 

http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=98041 its forum but yea...i thought that was common knowledge
 
I know this ... I'm just saying what others in baseball to include baseball players, they don't care. they rather have a pitcher throwing 95 to have full control of thebaseball by using pinetar than not use pinetar and lose control and hit them on their head.

Agreed. Its clearly a flimsy exploitable rule. Especially in a circumstance like this, its clear the pitcher needed more control.
Very different from when Buckholz was lathering up his hand with grease and sunblock
But for now, we're stuck with the rules saying no substance whatsoever

good look for clearing that up but yea catchers are allowed a little "strip" of pine tar on their shin guards


"Now that I've told you how to scuff, the question becomes: How much can players get away with in their own clubhouses? It's funny; pine tar is no big deal to players. Everybody uses pine tar. Catchers put in on their shinguards. Infielders put it in the pockets of their gloves so the ball will stick in there. It's almost a basic part of the game. Sandpaper and Vaseline, however, are looked at as cheating. They give pitchers too much of an advantage."

 
http://bbs.clutchfans.net/showthread.php?t=98041 its forum but yea...i thought that was common knowledge

Didn't know that about the catchers strip. Good to know

Also, from all the broadcast commentary of Pineda's last two games, its seems like every pitcher is constantly using pine tar, the Red Sox just didn't like that he was so blatant with it in two consecutive games
 
like what Buckholz did in the first game wasn't blatantly obvious. dude kept touching his clearly wet hair before pitches. Lmao ...
 
like what Buckholz did in the first game wasn't blatantly obvious. dude kept touching his clearly wet hair before pitches. Lmao ...

Agreed. But for some reason the Blue Jays didn't say anything. Im sure the Yanks will be extra on the lookout for others teams now
 
Back
Top Bottom