From Classy to Trashy

934
14
Joined
Oct 26, 2007
The II - IV models in the LeBron line were envelope-pushing, performance focused shoes that all looked pretty damn good. Seriously, remember the IV?

lebron-4-new.jpg


That's a damn shoe right there. Comfortable, striking, beasts on the court, everything you could ask for.

Anyway, four short years later, and this is what his signature model looks like. Keep in mind, the IV retailed at $150, with the expensive foamposite and thick zoom cushioning. This air max and synthetic upper of the VIII is $10 more expensive. So as the quality and style decrease, the price goes up.

Are you kidding me, Nike?

embarassed.gif


I wouldn't buy these at Ross for $39.99. They look like a Sears copy of a Nike shoe. Shame how the promising line got so messed up.

Nike-Air-Max-LeBron-VIII-8-Team-USA-White-Navy-Red-11.jpg
 
The II - IV models in the LeBron line were envelope-pushing, performance focused shoes that all looked pretty damn good. Seriously, remember the IV?

lebron-4-new.jpg


That's a damn shoe right there. Comfortable, striking, beasts on the court, everything you could ask for.

Anyway, four short years later, and this is what his signature model looks like. Keep in mind, the IV retailed at $150, with the expensive foamposite and thick zoom cushioning. This air max and synthetic upper of the VIII is $10 more expensive. So as the quality and style decrease, the price goes up.

Are you kidding me, Nike?

embarassed.gif


I wouldn't buy these at Ross for $39.99. They look like a Sears copy of a Nike shoe. Shame how the promising line got so messed up.

Nike-Air-Max-LeBron-VIII-8-Team-USA-White-Navy-Red-11.jpg
 
It's Vince Carter's Line all over again. Remember I-III? Futuristic shoes with great tech and appeared to be worth the price. Then downhill IV-VI. Bland, ugly, generic.
 
It's Vince Carter's Line all over again. Remember I-III? Futuristic shoes with great tech and appeared to be worth the price. Then downhill IV-VI. Bland, ugly, generic.
 
Originally Posted by vcshoxj6

It's Vince Carter's Line all over again. Remember I-III? Futuristic shoes with great tech and appeared to be worth the price. Then downhill IV-VI. Bland, ugly, generic.

I love the IV's, they werent the prettiest but they were a good basketball shoe.  The V's looked better but werent as functional as the IVs.
 
Originally Posted by vcshoxj6

It's Vince Carter's Line all over again. Remember I-III? Futuristic shoes with great tech and appeared to be worth the price. Then downhill IV-VI. Bland, ugly, generic.

I love the IV's, they werent the prettiest but they were a good basketball shoe.  The V's looked better but werent as functional as the IVs.
 
Originally Posted by vcshoxj6

It's Vince Carter's Line all over again. Remember I-III? Futuristic shoes with great tech and appeared to be worth the price. Then downhill IV-VI. Bland, ugly, generic.

I love the IV's, they werent the prettiest but they were a good basketball shoe.  The V's looked better but werent as functional as the IVs.
 
Originally Posted by vcshoxj6

It's Vince Carter's Line all over again. Remember I-III? Futuristic shoes with great tech and appeared to be worth the price. Then downhill IV-VI. Bland, ugly, generic.

I love the IV's, they werent the prettiest but they were a good basketball shoe.  The V's looked better but werent as functional as the IVs.
 
^i'm just talking from a general standpoint comparing the first three with the last three. you could tell that Nike gave up on the last three.
 
^i'm just talking from a general standpoint comparing the first three with the last three. you could tell that Nike gave up on the last three.
 
^i'm just talking from a general standpoint comparing the first three with the last three. you could tell that Nike gave up on the last three.
 
^i'm just talking from a general standpoint comparing the first three with the last three. you could tell that Nike gave up on the last three.
 
Originally Posted by thapointguy

seeing that you have the zkv in your sig, i hope it's not a bias opinion.

That's a fair point. I know people on NT always flame the ESPN-type argument "Who is the best?!?!" and make anything pro-Kobe also anti-Lebron or the other way around. I'm definitely not like that. My bias is to the shoe. Besides, I think the best complete player in basketball the last few years is Wade, so I don't care about the Mamba vs. the King. The Kobe V is just the best basketball shoe I've ever worn. I wish the LeBron line had fulfilled its promise the way the Kobe line has.
Oh well. It'll be Durant's League in a short time anyway. Let's hope Nike does him justice...
 
Originally Posted by thapointguy

seeing that you have the zkv in your sig, i hope it's not a bias opinion.

That's a fair point. I know people on NT always flame the ESPN-type argument "Who is the best?!?!" and make anything pro-Kobe also anti-Lebron or the other way around. I'm definitely not like that. My bias is to the shoe. Besides, I think the best complete player in basketball the last few years is Wade, so I don't care about the Mamba vs. the King. The Kobe V is just the best basketball shoe I've ever worn. I wish the LeBron line had fulfilled its promise the way the Kobe line has.
Oh well. It'll be Durant's League in a short time anyway. Let's hope Nike does him justice...
 
Originally Posted by thapointguy

seeing that you have the zkv in your sig, i hope it's not a bias opinion.

That's a fair point. I know people on NT always flame the ESPN-type argument "Who is the best?!?!" and make anything pro-Kobe also anti-Lebron or the other way around. I'm definitely not like that. My bias is to the shoe. Besides, I think the best complete player in basketball the last few years is Wade, so I don't care about the Mamba vs. the King. The Kobe V is just the best basketball shoe I've ever worn. I wish the LeBron line had fulfilled its promise the way the Kobe line has.
Oh well. It'll be Durant's League in a short time anyway. Let's hope Nike does him justice...
 
Back
Top Bottom