Oh I'm sorry, Did I Break Your Conversation........Well Allow Me A Movie Thread by S&T

Foxcatcher was excellent.

The story is disturbing, and for the viewers (you) sake don't read about the history of Jon Du Pont if you don't know the story of the film, because it can give away a big scene in the film. Regardless, the film is dark, harrowing and unlike any film we've seen this year. It's a character study - Tatum plays gold medal winning wrestler Mark Schultz who is very vulnerable. The idea of a father figure is a big backbone in the film as his brother Dave and Jon Du Pont lobby for who sort of takes control of Mark.

Carell is amazing, he transforms into the role and it's really horrifying. The film is uncomfortable, but brings out the best of the cast - there are also some laughs from the awkwardness of Carell's character. After the film - director Bennett Miller said the humor of the story in general - this rich rich man wanting to put the hub of USA Wrestling on his compound and then coaching the team with no experience in the sport what so ever - is what drew him to doing the film.

I'll save the rest of my full review, but it's a great film, very disturbing but a beautiful film.

Speaking to a few colleagues who do awards stuff, they told me that Carell and Tatum are both going for Best Actor, where Carell should probably be Supporting, but because it's a Sony Classics film - they are pushing J.K. Simmons from Whiplash for Supporting. Simmons will (better) win.

Carell should be nominated. Tatum is really good too, just fantastic performances from those 2.

1000

1000

1000
 
Last edited:
Always like how these comedians/comedic actors tend to be really good at playing these dark horrible evil characters. The yin and yang of it is crazy.
 
Comedians often have some dark stuff going on for real, so it's not that surprising.
 
Did you watch that Dracula movie Venom?
If so is it DVD worthy only or is the trip to the Theatre worth it?
 
I've decided that Steve Carrell is, in fact, a good actor. When's he's taken on dramatic, or semi-dramatic roles, he's delivered. Little Miss Sunshine, Crazy, Stupid, Love and now Foxcatcher. I would argue that his performance in 40 Year Old Virgin was a good acting job too. I hope he continues to take challenging roles and not just straight comedies.
 
That was definite good acting in 40 Yr Old Virgin. Like you take out the comedy and make it a serious movie about a dude who gets no yambs and I would be moved.
Sean Penn anyone? Kevin Spacey? :nerd:
Spacey's definitely in the discussion :smokin Always.
 
Last edited:
Looking forward to Silence next year.


Scorcese directing it.

Neeson, Garfield, Wantanabe starrring.
 
I guess Noah kicked off the Hollywood BigBudget films again on Biblical characters.

Pontius Pilate hits theaters in 2015.
 
^^Me

Sidenote: Just started ep 2 of Peaky Blinders, Tom Hardy finally shows up, he didn't make an appearance in ep 1
 
Last edited:
This. Nobody is really touching him, even with a limited filmography.

His filmography is not as limited as I thought, after recently looking it up on IMDB. He doesn't make a ton of movies, but he's been at it for a long time. He's been in some excellent films going all the way back into the 80s.
 
Cage is related to Coppola. That explains his greatness for sure.

Speaking of which, any of yous ever drink Coppola's wine? It's pretty decent.
 
Last edited:
Gone Girl: This bugged me when I saw the movie in the Theatre, and it bugged me even more when I watched it this morning when I first woke up. I don't want to ruin it for those who haven't seen the movie so, how do I put something in a spoiler?
 
[ spoiler ] content [ / spoiler ]

just remove the spaces in the brackets

Thank you

Back to my issue with Gone Girl.

This bugged me when I saw the movie in the Theatre, and it bugged me even more when I watched it this morning when I frost woke up.

Gone Girl: The first day (within hours) the woman is "missing" they put out APB's and are setting up press confrences(the police not the family). Even though the husband doesn't act suspicious nor does he think she is really missing they immediately do this. I thought the PD couldn't put out an APB or whatever until someone was missing for a period of time. Was it because the table was broke in the living room?
The other thing, when the PD begins investigating they find out that the kitchen had blood all over it after they shine the black lights but when the girl actually starts explaining how she planned to set her husband up she says that when it's all done and in place she will be on the water with a bottle of pills and some rocks so they could find her floating on the river. If and when they would end up finding her body they would have been suspicious because it was overdosed with pills and had no significant wounds to explain all her blood in the kitchen.

Oh well, it's a good watch. Probably watch it again before the weekend is out.
 
Last edited:
First things first. A lot of this has to be viewed as a satire once you reflect on the film. You kind of have to glance over the whole missing for an extended amount of time aspect.

As for the set up, Amy had plotted everything she was planning to do. She was just waiting until the time she felt like was perfect to kill herself. She was more than capable of making inflicting self-trauma, as evidenced by the hammer and bottle scenes. She could definitely give herself some bad wounds. :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom