- 671
- 20
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2010
man being married is a scary thought. no doubt.
- 2,447
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
Women have more game than most dudes these days...
and they arent sloppy like dudes either...
a woman will notice small differences in the way a man acts....
but most dudes dont even catch on....
and they arent sloppy like dudes either...
a woman will notice small differences in the way a man acts....
but most dudes dont even catch on....
- 2,447
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2008
Women have more game than most dudes these days...
and they arent sloppy like dudes either...
a woman will notice small differences in the way a man acts....
but most dudes dont even catch on....
and they arent sloppy like dudes either...
a woman will notice small differences in the way a man acts....
but most dudes dont even catch on....
- 4,366
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
Reading fail. I never said that I can't logically resist. It wasn't even implied since I didn't use the term "I".Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
so you're arguing that you're no more intellectually advanced than, say, a dog.....given that you cannot logically resist to act out a "primal instinct" even tho we have far surpassed "primal", right?
why even cook your meat before you eat it, primal insticts?
Also, NT always comes through with the terrible analogies
- 4,366
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
Reading fail. I never said that I can't logically resist. It wasn't even implied since I didn't use the term "I".Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
so you're arguing that you're no more intellectually advanced than, say, a dog.....given that you cannot logically resist to act out a "primal instinct" even tho we have far surpassed "primal", right?
why even cook your meat before you eat it, primal insticts?
Also, NT always comes through with the terrible analogies
antonlavey
Banned
- 28,211
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
As a man I benefit from double standard such as these, but double standards and hypocrisy of all kinds happens to be my pet peeve. What a dilemma.
antonlavey
Banned
- 28,211
- 847
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2008
As a man I benefit from double standard such as these, but double standards and hypocrisy of all kinds happens to be my pet peeve. What a dilemma.
ScroogeMcBuckz
formerly aceboogie
- 5,476
- 932
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
Been trying to tell you...
I know i ain't $#&@, but the strange thing is, my girl knows it too but won't leave the kid.
I know i ain't $#&@, but the strange thing is, my girl knows it too but won't leave the kid.
ScroogeMcBuckz
formerly aceboogie
- 5,476
- 932
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
Been trying to tell you...
I know i ain't $#&@, but the strange thing is, my girl knows it too but won't leave the kid.
I know i ain't $#&@, but the strange thing is, my girl knows it too but won't leave the kid.
- 21,576
- 10,193
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
Stuff like this makes me just want to cheat.
I feel like the world is slowly changing into a non-relationship based place. Another topic for another thread but it seems easier for everyone to have a main go to chick/man and both cheat all the want on the side. But main's have different qualities then JO's we all know it. But i consider myself a loyal person but it seems like (as dumb as it sounds) everyone just cheats these days. And im starting to see less and less wrong with it to tell you the truth.
I feel like the world is slowly changing into a non-relationship based place. Another topic for another thread but it seems easier for everyone to have a main go to chick/man and both cheat all the want on the side. But main's have different qualities then JO's we all know it. But i consider myself a loyal person but it seems like (as dumb as it sounds) everyone just cheats these days. And im starting to see less and less wrong with it to tell you the truth.
- 21,576
- 10,193
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
Stuff like this makes me just want to cheat.
I feel like the world is slowly changing into a non-relationship based place. Another topic for another thread but it seems easier for everyone to have a main go to chick/man and both cheat all the want on the side. But main's have different qualities then JO's we all know it. But i consider myself a loyal person but it seems like (as dumb as it sounds) everyone just cheats these days. And im starting to see less and less wrong with it to tell you the truth.
I feel like the world is slowly changing into a non-relationship based place. Another topic for another thread but it seems easier for everyone to have a main go to chick/man and both cheat all the want on the side. But main's have different qualities then JO's we all know it. But i consider myself a loyal person but it seems like (as dumb as it sounds) everyone just cheats these days. And im starting to see less and less wrong with it to tell you the truth.
- 324
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
Ehh, humans aren't monogamist creatures, no surprise here.
- 324
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2005
Ehh, humans aren't monogamist creatures, no surprise here.
- 1,920
- 104
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
Some of you guys should check out the book "manthropology". There's some interesting information in there about human sexuality and indigenous tribes.
- 1,920
- 104
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2006
Some of you guys should check out the book "manthropology". There's some interesting information in there about human sexuality and indigenous tribes.
larrydavidswag
Banned
- 1,767
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
Originally Posted by moneymike88
Reading fail. I never said that I can't logically resist. It wasn't even implied since I didn't use the term "I".Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
so you're arguing that you're no more intellectually advanced than, say, a dog.....given that you cannot logically resist to act out a "primal instinct" even tho we have far surpassed "primal", right?
why even cook your meat before you eat it, primal insticts?
Also, NT always comes through with the terrible analogies
how is that a reading fail?
you're justifying men not being monogamous by citing some primal instinct...
we havent been acting out of primal instinct since civilization was established...
so, we are expected to and can curb every since primal urge we have EXCEPT banging madd girls?
my favorite thing is an NTer with low reading comprehension telling me, a holder of a degree in English, i cant read...
oh, and because i addressed YOU, doesnt mean it wasnt a general address
like "to win you have to play", that's just a general English fyi, sir.
i mean, unless, of course, you arent a man....then, you werent arguing a justification of your own gender, you were just making a statement.
larrydavidswag
Banned
- 1,767
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
Originally Posted by moneymike88
Reading fail. I never said that I can't logically resist. It wasn't even implied since I didn't use the term "I".Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
so you're arguing that you're no more intellectually advanced than, say, a dog.....given that you cannot logically resist to act out a "primal instinct" even tho we have far surpassed "primal", right?
why even cook your meat before you eat it, primal insticts?
Also, NT always comes through with the terrible analogies
how is that a reading fail?
you're justifying men not being monogamous by citing some primal instinct...
we havent been acting out of primal instinct since civilization was established...
so, we are expected to and can curb every since primal urge we have EXCEPT banging madd girls?
my favorite thing is an NTer with low reading comprehension telling me, a holder of a degree in English, i cant read...
oh, and because i addressed YOU, doesnt mean it wasnt a general address
like "to win you have to play", that's just a general English fyi, sir.
i mean, unless, of course, you arent a man....then, you werent arguing a justification of your own gender, you were just making a statement.
- 15,292
- 7,678
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
Speaking of girls cheating....
I've been talking to a girl at work who broke up with her boyfriend, she just got back with him but went with me to a concert monday night.... she kissed me several times, was all over me all night.
Granted we didn't sleep together or anything but it's still technically cheating.
I think, I was trying to get with this girl, but if she did that to him she probably can't be trusted.
I've been talking to a girl at work who broke up with her boyfriend, she just got back with him but went with me to a concert monday night.... she kissed me several times, was all over me all night.
Granted we didn't sleep together or anything but it's still technically cheating.
I think, I was trying to get with this girl, but if she did that to him she probably can't be trusted.
- 15,292
- 7,678
- Joined
- May 14, 2002
Speaking of girls cheating....
I've been talking to a girl at work who broke up with her boyfriend, she just got back with him but went with me to a concert monday night.... she kissed me several times, was all over me all night.
Granted we didn't sleep together or anything but it's still technically cheating.
I think, I was trying to get with this girl, but if she did that to him she probably can't be trusted.
I've been talking to a girl at work who broke up with her boyfriend, she just got back with him but went with me to a concert monday night.... she kissed me several times, was all over me all night.
Granted we didn't sleep together or anything but it's still technically cheating.
I think, I was trying to get with this girl, but if she did that to him she probably can't be trusted.
- 4,366
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
I stopped right there. Not being monogamous doesn't mean that you're automatically promiscuous. That's a reading fail, sir.Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
Originally Posted by moneymike88
Reading fail. I never said that I can't logically resist. It wasn't even implied since I didn't use the term "I".Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
so you're arguing that you're no more intellectually advanced than, say, a dog.....given that you cannot logically resist to act out a "primal instinct" even tho we have far surpassed "primal", right?
why even cook your meat before you eat it, primal insticts?
Also, NT always comes through with the terrible analogies
how is that a reading fail?
you're justifying men not being monogamous by citing some primal instinct...
we havent been acting out of primal instinct since civilization was established...
so, we are expected to and can curb every since primal urge we have EXCEPT banging madd girls?
my favorite thing is an NTer with low reading comprehension telling me, a holder of a degree in English, i cant read...
oh, and because i addressed YOU, doesnt mean it wasnt a general address
like "to win you have to play", that's just a general English fyi, sir.
i mean, unless, of course, you arent a man....then, you werent arguing a justification of your own gender, you were just making a statement.
- 4,366
- 11
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
I stopped right there. Not being monogamous doesn't mean that you're automatically promiscuous. That's a reading fail, sir.Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
Originally Posted by moneymike88
Reading fail. I never said that I can't logically resist. It wasn't even implied since I didn't use the term "I".Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag
so you're arguing that you're no more intellectually advanced than, say, a dog.....given that you cannot logically resist to act out a "primal instinct" even tho we have far surpassed "primal", right?
why even cook your meat before you eat it, primal insticts?
Also, NT always comes through with the terrible analogies
how is that a reading fail?
you're justifying men not being monogamous by citing some primal instinct...
we havent been acting out of primal instinct since civilization was established...
so, we are expected to and can curb every since primal urge we have EXCEPT banging madd girls?
my favorite thing is an NTer with low reading comprehension telling me, a holder of a degree in English, i cant read...
oh, and because i addressed YOU, doesnt mean it wasnt a general address
like "to win you have to play", that's just a general English fyi, sir.
i mean, unless, of course, you arent a man....then, you werent arguing a justification of your own gender, you were just making a statement.
- 17,697
- 2,714
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
Aey bro, on the humble, help me understand what attracts you to these women. U can PM me if u want but I notice that u find a lot of bad apples which while discourage a person in the long run.
To stay on topic. Bein married, this troubles me, but I can't do nothin about it. If my wife is gon cheat, she's gon cheat. Women cheat better than men, and it helps that the other dude is tryna keep gettin the box so he aint sayin anything. I've come to a point to just accept the fact that ppl are gon do what they wanna do regardless. I've been unfaithful in the past so I can't get mad if she does, whether married or not. As hard as it may be, sometimes u gotta take the L and the lesson that comes w/ it.
- 17,697
- 2,714
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2006
Aey bro, on the humble, help me understand what attracts you to these women. U can PM me if u want but I notice that u find a lot of bad apples which while discourage a person in the long run.
To stay on topic. Bein married, this troubles me, but I can't do nothin about it. If my wife is gon cheat, she's gon cheat. Women cheat better than men, and it helps that the other dude is tryna keep gettin the box so he aint sayin anything. I've come to a point to just accept the fact that ppl are gon do what they wanna do regardless. I've been unfaithful in the past so I can't get mad if she does, whether married or not. As hard as it may be, sometimes u gotta take the L and the lesson that comes w/ it.
larrydavidswag
Banned
- 1,767
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
In human sexual behavior, promiscuity refers to the practice of having many sexual partners in the absence of any commitment
monogamy may also refer to the more general state of having only one mate at any one time and as such may be applied to the social behavior of some animals.[sup][1][/sup]In current usage monogamy often refers to having one sexual partner irrespective of marriage or reproduction.[sup][citation needed][/sup]
oh.
you werent bringing up primal insticts to justify having more than one mate?
oh.
having more than one mate at any given time isnt called promiscuity?
oh.
Having more than one mate at any given time isnt the direct opposite of monogamy, which means having only one mate at a time?
oh.
larrydavidswag
Banned
- 1,767
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
In human sexual behavior, promiscuity refers to the practice of having many sexual partners in the absence of any commitment
monogamy may also refer to the more general state of having only one mate at any one time and as such may be applied to the social behavior of some animals.[sup][1][/sup]In current usage monogamy often refers to having one sexual partner irrespective of marriage or reproduction.[sup][citation needed][/sup]
oh.
you werent bringing up primal insticts to justify having more than one mate?
oh.
having more than one mate at any given time isnt called promiscuity?
oh.
Having more than one mate at any given time isnt the direct opposite of monogamy, which means having only one mate at a time?
oh.
Similar threads
- Deleted member 248173
- General
