Tmac to Chicago?

3,147
10
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Seven years later, is it finally time to bring Tracy McGrady to Chicago?

The Houston Rockets might not object. Remember, it was in 2000 that McGrady was the focus of the Bulls' post-championship rebuilding, but he spurned theBulls for Orlando. Six first-round playoff exits later for McGrady between Orlando and Houston, the Rockets are stumbling amid great expectations. McGrady hasbeen out with sore knees and sore feelings, and there are rumblings in Houston about a trade.

Lakers part-owner Magic Johnson suggested on TNT that either McGrady or Yao Ming should be traded.

"It's not working out," Johnson said. "We've seen it for all these years; they get eliminated from the first round. I thought they weregoing to play well together, but it's not working. One of them has to go because it's not working."

"It's just speculation," Rockets coach Rick Adelman said. "You can't be giving away your best players."

Perhaps the biggest issue with the Rockets is Adelman's philosophy to play more of an open-court style and run while McGrady's style is to play in thehalf-court. It could make McGrady expendable, with the Rockets internally wondering now how he fits, insiders say.

And with McGrady's injury history, the Rockets might look into this.

So is there a match for the Bulls? After all, McGrady is what the NBA calls a star, even though he never has been as far into the playoffs as Ben Gordon.McGrady makes $18.2 million this season and has about $43 million left in two seasons after this.

The Bulls could match that easily with, say, Ben Wallace and Gordon, giving the Rockets power forward protection for Yao and a shooter for their gang thatcan't shoot straight. Wallace could return to his natural power forward position while the Bulls get a big guard who is an All-Star.

Would that be the star the Bulls have long sought? At 28, is he still worth the price and risk? Can the Rockets get more if indeed they decide to make changes?It might be worth pursuing.

http://chicagosports.chicagotribune...trade,1,3896716.story?coll=cs-bulls-headlines
 
smh.gif
 
they wouldnt trade a package of players for Kobe why would they trade for Tmacs wack#@+!?
 
Originally Posted by Bigmike23

they wouldnt trade a package of players for Kobe why would they trade for Tmacs wack#@+!?

tmac's trade value isn't as high. but as long as the rockets don't ask for deng AND gordon, chicago will listen.

smith's offer of wallace + gordon is too low. if it's something like gordon, pick + one of their young players sans hinirch & deng, it could godown.
 
When T-Mac was traded to Houston I thought it was a bad idea for him. I'd like to see him in Chicago. Why wouldn't Chicago want to get rid of BenWallace? He hasn't performed up to his huge contract expectations, he hasn't even played up to where he was in Detroit.
 
Maybe he just needs more time to adapt to aldemans playing style. Lets see wat their record is at the all star break. if they are still under .500 then itstime for a trade
 
Originally Posted by nnarum

When T-Mac was traded to Houston I thought it was a bad idea for him. I'd like to see him in Chicago. Why wouldn't Chicago want to get rid of Ben Wallace? He hasn't performed up to his huge contract expectations, he hasn't even played up to where he was in Detroit.
The question is, which team would be dumb enough to take him and his contract on?
 
That would be a steal for the Bulls, they aren't getting anything out of Ben Wallace and T-Mac is a poor man's Kobe Bryant so it would be a good deal.I still don't understand why the Bulls didn't trade for Kobe when they had the chance, are Hinrich, Gordon, Tyrus, and Noah really that valuable?
 
Lakers didnt want Hinrich, they wanted Gordon and Deng. Hinrich is worthless especially this season. So far Fisher>Hinrich this season.
 
it really wouldnt do nothing for neither team...and yea, if they wouldnt give up much for Kobe, they wouldnt for T-Mac, who is known to be injury-pronenowdays...the Bulls wouldnt even pull the trigger on that, let alone the Rockets...
 
Originally Posted by franchise3

Originally Posted by nnarum

When T-Mac was traded to Houston I thought it was a bad idea for him. I'd like to see him in Chicago. Why wouldn't Chicago want to get rid of Ben Wallace? He hasn't performed up to his huge contract expectations, he hasn't even played up to where he was in Detroit.
The question is, which team would be dumb enough to take him and his contract on?

http://blogs.nypost.com/sports/knicks/archives/isiah_thomas.jpg.jpg
isiah_thomas.jpg.jpg
 
I love T-Mac, I still stand firm on believing, if healthy, he'd be the best player in the L hands down. He reminds me of Grant Hill now,he can't be a star anymore, he'd be the best second option in the league.
 
Originally Posted by ACBboyz84

I still stand firm on believing, if healthy, he'd be the best player in the L hands down
Please log off. T-Mac is no where near top 5.


Get out of here, if people want to argue that Kobe is top 5 in the league, you can argue Tracy is as well (when healthy) cuz he's just as good.

Only players I can name that compete are:

Tim Duncan
LeBron James
Kevin Garnett
and Steve Nash
 
Back
Top Bottom