- 13,597
- 26,331
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
Wonder if shipping from Classic will offset the 15% discount? Halloweens for
2024 NIKE SB DUNK THREAD_____GRs and QSs added
- Thread in 'Nike Retro' Thread starter Started by elcerrito91,
- Start date
- 10,017
- 3,308
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
it's more about the seller flipping a defective pair with no shots of the defects
when reselling you know how serious the buyers are about the appearance of the shoe
when reselling you know how serious the buyers are about the appearance of the shoe
- 9,407
- 8,127
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- 13,597
- 26,331
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
I disagree...in my opinion, the seller is completely off the hook for any QC issues, whether mentioned or not, as long as they don't affect wearability (rips/tears/separation/etc.).
I can understand the disappointment, but asking for a partial refund is completely unreasonable in my opinion.
I can understand the disappointment, but asking for a partial refund is completely unreasonable in my opinion.
- 2,831
- 585
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2012
exactly. if im paying a premium on the shoes, atleast point out all defects. QC control errors are out of the sellers hands, but reselling them and pointing out defects arents, i dont see how requesting a partial refund is a bad thing at all. if i sell you something and theres a scratch in the print/knit thats noticeable, and you paid me $300 for them, would you just shrug it off?
- 724
- 1,392
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2014
I do recognize concerns on that level; but it's a slippery slope we are about to traverse. Premier and NDC alike have sent me shoes with flaws of this degree. From the posted pics, I'm not seeing any "B-grade" level inconsistencies. I'd like to argue these flaws are within the realm of "acceptable variance". Now a whole side panel missing the SB embroidery...... that would be egregious, and intolerable.
- 13,597
- 26,331
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
Couple cheapskate (no pun intended) size 13 deals (not mine):
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=161448798650
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=161448801432
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=161448796469
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=161448798650
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=161448801432
http://pages.ebay.com/link/?nav=item.view&alt=web&id=161448796469
- 53
- 224
- Joined
- May 23, 2014
Weren't these lows?
- 10,017
- 3,308
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2005
there are thousands of promo codes cats beg outta nike at the regular price
nikes fault or not a defected pair on the resell market will not fetch as much as a so called perfect pair if the flaws are noticed
nikes fault or not a defected pair on the resell market will not fetch as much as a so called perfect pair if the flaws are noticed
Last edited:
- 18,012
- 8,440
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2013
these are
imo don't care if they are a yeezy-espue cw or not
pics from the original listing. No signs of anything wrong in the pics. I find it kind interesting some of you think the seller has zero blame here. My perspective is, I don't want the sneakers - I would've never purchased them had these flaws been shown to me. So what are my options? Try to get a refund or flip them myself. Just as a seller in general, not even a sneakerhead, I would never try to hide a flaw like in an ebay listing. To me it's dishonest but whatever.
- 154
- 77
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2013
Look better as a high imo these are dope
- 931
- 580
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
Open a claim request a full refund and return, or come to some sort of in between with the seller. If his pics arent of the actual product you should be covered from ebays end.
- 13,597
- 26,331
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
So you're saying if I list something (that is brand new) with a stock image, and the item has a defect from the FACTORY, something that is 100% out of my control...that a buyer could file a dispute against me?
FOH.
Lemme know your eBay usernames so I can throw you on the block list rq.
Last edited:
- 931
- 580
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
Hes not a store selling a brand new product, hes reselling a pulled shoe that never had a release, and even if that wasn't the case his product came "damaged" he could return it under those circumstances to any legit retail location anywhere...You think a guy should be able to "probably" knowingly sell a damaged product and not have to worry about returns ect/ just because he used stock photos? That doesn't make any sense at all.
- 2,831
- 585
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2012
lmao thats exactly right. you sell something, you better ship me what i see in the pictures. maybe youre just too rich to care about paying $100s on sneakers and getting trash back. doesnt matter if its a factory defect. as a seller youre required to list all defects with an item youre selling. defects are 100% out of your control but selling the sneakers/listing problems with them is 100% IN your control. grow up
- 2,785
- 1,156
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2011
how are the shoes damaged though 
you ocd dudes are ridiculous sometimes man. its like some of you literally sit there and try to FIND something wrong with the shoes.
the issue is that what some of you might find 'defective' or might have an issue with, another person might not.
you ocd dudes are ridiculous sometimes man. its like some of you literally sit there and try to FIND something wrong with the shoes.
the issue is that what some of you might find 'defective' or might have an issue with, another person might not.
- 2,831
- 585
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2012
im not talking about glue stains or small foam/tow box creases. if theres a noticeable flaw in the print on the shoe like rubbed off lettering, take a picture of it
- 411
- 196
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2014
I've decided I'm going to save up for one of grails and pay whatever it takes to get the skunks
- 2,831
- 585
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2012
i cant even find sz12s anymore and when the rare pairs do come up theyre $500+
- 411
- 196
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2014
Yeah, I most likely will end up paying that if not more since the only pairs I see going for less are really worn pairs and I'll only settle for DS. Do you know if these came out before they started shrinking the toe boxes? Because I'm a 9 in older SBs but noticed I'm a 9.5 with newer SBs
- 2,599
- 801
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2013
Seller should be responsible if the listing's images do not represent the shipped product. Not the buyer's fault that the seller is too lazy/busy to take accurate pictures.
- 1,209
- 309
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2014
- 13,597
- 26,331
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
We're not talking about sellers with used shoes hiding flaws, we're talking about sellers with new shoes potentially unknowingly not showing factory defects...apples to oranges, my opinion is steadfast, buyer has no beef here (with the seller, at least).
Last edited:
- 1,489
- 540
- Joined
- May 14, 2006
You may not have an issue with it or get it, but the person paying 3x retwil certainly does. It's not unfathomable that he'll get his money back if the seller didn't provide accurate pictures.
And trust me I think the flaws are extremely nitpicky but the price paid does a lot to affect whether this is a problem or not, at that price point it should be perfect.
Just like if I dropped 500 on skunks they better not have a flaw anywhere or they're going back
And trust me I think the flaws are extremely nitpicky but the price paid does a lot to affect whether this is a problem or not, at that price point it should be perfect.
Just like if I dropped 500 on skunks they better not have a flaw anywhere or they're going back
