- 9,833
- 6,590
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
I don't have any Tigers like that lol. Just don't want some big ole boats or too damn tight either.
Asics Love?!? Where is it?
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by az005us,
- Start date
- 3,317
- 301
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2013
Yea you actually wear the same exact sizing as me so get the 9.5
A 10 will do too but I like my shoes snug
A 10 will do too but I like my shoes snug
Last edited:
- 4,453
- 4,171
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
- 6,770
- 7,362
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
Wish asics made more than 1990 of the 25th anniversary pairs. Would be way better if there was plenty to go around. Seems like the dirty bucks are going to be a real struggle for me to get since online is my only option. And if packers are tough then other collabs like Afew or RF are gonna be super hard to get without paying resale.
- 2,065
- 819
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2014
Its gonna piss me of all the way till 2016 lol
- 685
- 109
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
Hopefully Packers release online, right now it's looking bad.
- 6,770
- 7,362
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
Real bad. I would find it really odd if they didn't release their own collab online though.
- 34
- 33
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2014
unfortunately I would not be surprised, this is Packer we're talking about....
- 685
- 109
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2014
That's what I was thinking but you never know these days. Did Mita release online? I don't remember since a lot of stores got them and released them online.
- 6,770
- 7,362
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
I'm pretty sure Mita went online. Not positive though bc I didn't go for them.
- 8,560
- 3,537
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
- 6,770
- 7,362
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
They already went live on mita?
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
Talking about mita, does a size 13 exist in the dried roses anywhere?
alp
Banned
- 39,966
- 8,990
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
I'd take a 12, haven't seen that either
.
- 2,065
- 819
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2014
I only know english lol
- 313
- 168
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
i know where im copping tomorrow
http://www.sneakersnstuff.com/en/product/17731/asics-gel-lyte-iii
http://www.sneakersnstuff.com/en/product/17731/asics-gel-lyte-iii
- 133
- 37
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
In store first, remaining pairs available online after. that usually doesn't end well.
- 313
- 168
- Joined
- May 16, 2010
Yeah my bad i just caught that. Welp I guess im back to not getting anything tomorrow.
- 1,146
- 1,018
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2003
I think mitas only ended up on 2 websites, everyone else was instore only. Expect packers and the rest of the 25th's to be the same.
- 5,474
- 3,811
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2012
mitas popped up in a ton of places online
don't think it will be the case with packers though
don't think it will be the case with packers though
- 133
- 37
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2013
how limited is 1990?? can anyone help me put that in perspective? Say 50 shops WW get these, and if they get 25 pairs, that's 1250. Leaves 740 to be sold @ Packer. I just throwing out numbers here.... 1990 just doesn't seem all that limited to me.
- 1,555
- 575
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2013
Not every pair that is made will be sold and there will be more than 50 shops releasing them
theboxstacker
formerly mrforce1
- 2,428
- 1,238
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2003
25 per store isn't a lot at all when each line up is 100 + deep. Not to mention dudes like myself who live in the 4th largest city in the country and yet not a single pair is hitting my STATE so I then have to use resources to secure a pair from an already short list of stores. Then you got the guys who are regulars/friends/fam at some of these stores to be accounted for, then there's also the store owners/employees that want them...so yeah, 1,990 isn't a lot at all when there's probably 8K-10K dudes that wanna cop to wear/wanna flip/would buy just to say they copped/hypebeasts/etc. all going after 1,990 pairs. Check this thread tomorrow for "struck out" posts tomorrow and maybe that'll better put things in perspective
- 7,347
- 4,987
- Joined
- May 21, 2013
Packer gonna be a problem. Kith ain't getting them
Last edited:
