Jordan Spizike test report (Translated from Chinese)

Sorry for poor translation on google, details in original copies can be visit here: http://www.hk-kicks.com/forum/showthread.php?t=12764



Jordan Spizike test report [font=Tahoma, Verdana]
[/font]


Test shoes: Jordan Spizike (315371-415)

Thank you for posting this review but the reviewer is far too generous with his scores. The one that stands out is breathability which is a huge downfall of these kicks, yet the reviewer gives it a 75. Likewise the scoring for ankle support and cushioning is far too high.

I haven't owned a pair of OG Vs or the '99 retros but the '06 retros had very little padding around the ankle and I won't even comment on any retro Vs after '06 as construction and padding are a thing of the past. Cushioning is an interesting point as it does use a setup from the early 90s but the price point of these hybrids is not reflective of the older technology it possesses.

As a basketball sneaker these should really score a C or C- as the technology is dated but the price point is similar to a higher performing model. Yeah you can hoop in them but there are far better and cheaper alternatives.

As a lifestyle sneaker these score a F as they are 100% derivative of older models - they aren't a reimagining or a reinterpretation of a classic, just a mish mash of different components haphazardly thrown together. 
 

good review!

cant believe someone played ball in these ...

Originally Posted by chichoi

cant believe someone played ball in these ...

Click to expand...

 same thoughts came to mind

very generous mark.

I would agree that these are generous marks

Here comes the translation for the the "generous marks" by human Chinese translators:

Appearance: 95
Breathability: 75
Comfortable fit: 85
Shock-absorbing: 75
Ankle-support: 80
Wear-resistance  & Grip: 80
Overrall Grading: B+

Thought it might help in some way...