- 71
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
Hi guys, I'm staying in Singapore and I just got the flyknit racer in lucid green.. I own the multicolor and afew pair but this 2014 lucid green seem slightly narrower.. Anyone can confirm this?
OFFICIAL: Nike Zoom FLYKNIT Collection - Racers + Trainers ONLY - (SIZE POLL ON FIRST PAGE. CHECK TH
- 71
- 12
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
- 186
- 44
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
Them padded collars though.
I don't even mind them to be honest- sure, unpadded would of been my preference but at $110 apiece I definitely can't complain.
Last edited:
- 186
- 44
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2014
Well, hello there... picture is relevant to my interests. Would date and wear matching FK's with.
Last edited:
- 1,071
- 1,367
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
Who cares !!!!! For $ 220 that´s a steal... congrats buddy and enjoy them !!!!!!!
- 305
- 94
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
This man just said $220 is a steal. That must mean any who purchased them at $95 shipped directly from Nike when they were discounted practically 'got them for free.'
- 338
- 58
- Joined
- May 2, 2013
pretty much...paying anything under retail for b/w or w/b trainers is a steal
- 34,982
- 16,878
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2005
Anybody who pays extra for an unpadded collar is foolish.
- 305
- 94
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
Paying under retail being a steal I can understand, but that man just said paying $220 was a steal. That makes me jump back and do a double take.
- 258
- 95
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2013
OP can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he purchased both pairs for $220 total, which is a steal.
Last edited:
- 88
- 21
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
I'm pretty sure OP bought both for 220
- 1,071
- 1,367
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
^^^^^ This...Guys, do you even read....he cop for $ 110 each...a steal padded or not !!!!!!!I don't even mind them to be honest- sure, unpadded would of been my preference but at $110 apiece I definitely can't complain.
Last edited:
- 10,510
- 10,591
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
- 1,071
- 1,367
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
deleted
Last edited:
- 1,071
- 1,367
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
^^^^^ This...Guys, do you even read....he cop for $ 110 each...a steal padded or not !!!!!!!I don't even mind them to be honest- sure, unpadded would of been my preference but at $110 apiece I definitely can't complain.
Last edited:
- 305
- 94
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2013
I guess the misinterpretation is on my part. I am guilty for looking at a single comment without looking back to see the context. I opened up the thread and saw gusmq's post in big bold letters and it prompted me to immediately think of something else.
- 338
- 58
- Joined
- May 2, 2013
well yes, i was replying to you in which you said $95.
and he copped each pair for $110, still under retail so obviously still a steal as well
- 91
- 25
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
Now sell me those White / Black Trainers for $200 and you have almost got the Black / White for free ... that is a real steal!
... Do it ...
... Do it ...
- 1,170
- 681
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2014
- 5,644
- 922
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2005
- 1,325
- 131
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
paying retail now for w/b or b/w trainers is also a steal. most of you guys who complain about padded vs unpadded dont even run in your shoes and just wear it casually. To that point it doesnt matter if its padded or unpaded.
- 34,982
- 16,878
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2005
Most dudes who complain about padded vs unpadded are trying to feel like an "OG" by having unpadded trainers.
Swear they got the equivalent of OG jays smh
Swear they got the equivalent of OG jays smh
endeesee
Banned
- 7,788
- 1,491
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2014
honestly padded vs unpadded is for comfort... unpadded are much more comfortable
- 1,325
- 131
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- 666
- 320
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
I wouldn't say comfort has anything to do with it, but they are a more sleeker shoe than the padded. They are astectically nicer. Being "OG" has nothing to do with it. Atleast for me it doesn't.
Time to warp back over 100+ to start this debate agin
