Redd might be traded?

I think its hilarious that Cavs fans always flood NT with ridiculous trade ideas when a superstar will/wants/might be traded. You guys are getting worse thanLaker fans. The plain and simple fact is you do NOT have the talent on your team to make trades for anyone who is that good. Period.
 
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/featur...2792~2178&teams=15~15~15~15~10~10~10&te=&cash=

Do It Morey!
laugh.gif
 
ppl sayin redd should have signed with cle.......what about ray ray and jj? All 3 of these guys were wanted by cle.......and cle had to settle for larry hughes
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by WILLINC

Redd + LeBron = EC on lock.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
not really, they still wont be better than detroit or boston
grin.gif


Boston lost to us when we had just LeBron. No Hughes, no Varejao, no Marshall, no Pavlovic. Don't be so naive to say Redd wouldnt make us better than them.Hell, we beat DET last year and both teams have the same rosters, and DET in fact is getting older.
 
I'd rather have them trade Villanueva, Simmons, Gadzuric, Bell before they try trading Redd. Either way this team needs a major make over. Yi should bethe only one not on the trading block.
 
first thing I thought was Cleveland, but they have no one attractable


give us Dirk, mavs :tongue: bucks could've had him
frown.gif



I hope Redd doesnt leave tho
 
If the Warriors can land Redd without giving up our ability to sign Monta, Andris, Baron, and the rest to long term deals, I'm all for it.
 
/\ so basically you're saying if they cant get Michael Redd without giving up anyone good then you're all for it?
 
Warriors could use Redd. The trade i posted in page 2 would work both ways.


mil.gif
[h2]Milwaukee Bucks[/h2]

[table][tr][th=""]Incoming Players[/th] [/tr][tr][td]
3714.jpg
[/td] [td]
Mickael Pietrus
Salary: $3,470,771 Years Remaining: 1
PTS: 6.0 REB: 2.9 AST: 0.7 PER: 11.44

1-Year Bird Must receive consent to trade players with a 1-year contract, excluding options, who will become Early Bird or Bird free agents at the end of the contract, or players who have accepted a qualifying offer for a 5th season following the 4th option season on the Rookie Scale. If the player consents, he will lose his Bird rights and become a non-Bird free agent at the end of the contract.
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]
3268.jpg
[/td] [td]
Al Harrington
Salary: $8,425,625 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 14.9 REB: 5.5 AST: 1.7 PER: 17.45
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]
4166.jpg
[/td] [td]
Kosta Perovic
Salary: $1,800,000 Years Remaining: 3
[/td] [/tr][/table]
Outgoing Players: Michael Redd, Charlie Villanueva

gsw.gif
[h2]Golden State Warriors[/h2]

[table][tr][th=""]Incoming Players[/th] [/tr][tr][td]
3442.jpg
[/td] [td]
Michael Redd
Salary: $14,520,000 Years Remaining: 4
PTS: 23.4 REB: 4.9 AST: 3.8 PER: 20.98
[/td] [/tr][tr][td]
3933.jpg
[/td] [td]
Charlie Villanueva
Salary: $2,715,000 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 9.6 REB: 4.7 AST: 0.5 PER: 14.25

Obtained with a trade exception
[/td] [/tr][/table]
Outgoing Players: Mickael Pietrus, Al Harrington, Kosta Perovic
 
Originally Posted by lnMyMind

/\ so basically you're saying if they cant get Michael Redd without giving up anyone good then you're all for it?
Click to expand...
The problem with getting Redd for the Warriors is that we traded J-Rich away because of his contract. We wanted the cap room to help us sign MontaEllis and Andris Biedrins to long term deals. Baron Davis is also looking for a contract extension so we obviously need that cap room. If we take on MichaelRedd who is earning $14,520,000 for the next 4 years, we are most likely going to lose that cap room we created by trading Richardson.

Do I expect the Warriors to get Redd? No, because of the aforementioned reasons. But if Mullin found a way to get something done and still have our cap room.I'd be all for it.

That's what I meant.
 
Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt

Originally Posted by lnMyMind

/\ so basically you're saying if they cant get Michael Redd without giving up anyone good then you're all for it?
Click to expand...
The problem with getting Redd for the Warriors is that we traded J-Rich away because of his contract. We wanted the cap room to help us sign Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins to long term deals. Baron Davis is also looking for a contract extension so we obviously need that cap room. If we take on Michael Redd who is earning $14,520,000 for the next 4 years, we are most likely going to lose that cap room we created by trading Richardson.

Do I expect the Warriors to get Redd? No, because of the aforementioned reasons. But if Mullin found a way to get something done and still have our cap room. I'd be all for it.

That's what I meant.
Click to expand...

True, what do you think about the trade i posted?
 
Originally Posted by GSDOUBLEU

Originally Posted by Paul Is On Tilt

Originally Posted by lnMyMind

/\ so basically you're saying if they cant get Michael Redd without giving up anyone good then you're all for it?
Click to expand...
The problem with getting Redd for the Warriors is that we traded J-Rich away because of his contract. We wanted the cap room to help us sign Monta Ellis and Andris Biedrins to long term deals. Baron Davis is also looking for a contract extension so we obviously need that cap room. If we take on Michael Redd who is earning $14,520,000 for the next 4 years, we are most likely going to lose that cap room we created by trading Richardson.

Do I expect the Warriors to get Redd? No, because of the aforementioned reasons. But if Mullin found a way to get something done and still have our cap room. I'd be all for it.

That's what I meant.
Click to expand...

True, what do you think about the trade i posted?
Click to expand...

That trade would get us that outside shooter we desperately need. But I would hate to see Harrington leave. I don't know why. I like him as a Warrior.
 
I don't understand how the whole VanHorn contract works, but the Mavericks can in fact fudge the numbers a bit and use him as a monster expiring...If the Bucks wanted some SERIOUS cap relief, the Mavs could make it happen with the KVH deal.


The way I understand it, the Mavericks own the rights to KVH, and they could sign him for an outrageous one-year contract, trade him to a team seeking capspace (if we wanted Shaq, [USING AS A PURE EXAMPLE] the Mavericks could sign KVH to a 17-mil one year deal, tag him along with Gana Diop, and that would workout financially, and the Heat would get 17-million of cap space.

So, if the Mavericks waned to try and go after Redd, they could sign KVH to a deal say worth... ship out someone that would attract the Bucks (be it MoAger+Fazekas, Bass, Diop, Jones, George, whoever, and whatever remainder of the differential, that would be how much KVH's contract would be worth, so asan example, George's contract is 2.50 million (according to 2k8, had it on
nerd.gif
laugh.gif
), and Redd's contract is just under 15m, so the Mavericks could sign KVH to a12.50 million (ridiculous sounding, I know), but that gives the Bucks amazing cap space, and maybe a decent player/picks in the meantime as well if they wantit. It's a very interesting aspect for the Mavericks to consider, and I'm all for it, I'm content with the Mavericks roster, but I know that our SGposition there's no solid starter, and if we had Redd, that'd make things
pimp.gif
forthe Mavericks.

Also, the Bucks should keep Mo Williams as long as humanly possible, he's a really good PG.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

raider5
2023 NT NFL Mock Draft
6 7 8
Replies
194
Views
14K
raider5
raider5
B
Black woman calls cops only to be killed by cops.
Replies
11
Views
2K
1995
1995
therealest1
Nike Air DT Max 96 (Deion Sanders)
Replies
12
Views
2K
bklyn style baby
bklyn style baby
you go boy
Need your Prayers for my Dad
3 4 5
Replies
100
Views
7K
ajiiiplatinum
ajiiiplatinum

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom