oh god. hes walking down a very populated area with a gun and thats okay with you?Originally Posted by frostythepoptart
you know whats cool about this point?
the fact that if he could exercise his rights freely he would never be given this satisfaction.
The illegal action of a minority of police should not dictate our rights.Originally Posted by mondaynightraw
How stupid are some of y'all?�
Dude walked in the street..waving a gun around�
Quoting "sections" and all this bs�
Had that camera not been there, cop could've shot him in cold blood.�
Witnesses would've later been saying, "he was waving a gun around earlier in the day"
People are dumb�
The most controversial provisions to receive wide attention are contained in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled "Counter-Terrorism." In particular, sub-sections 1021 and 1022, which deal with detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism, have generated controversy as to their legal meaning and their potential implications for abuse of Presidential authority. Although the White House[9] and Senate sponsors[1maintain that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) already grants presidential authority for indefinite detention, the Act states that Congress "affirms" this authority and makes specific provisions as to the exercise of that authority.[11][12] The detention provisions of the Act have received critical attention by, among others, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, and some media sources which are concerned about the scope of the President's authority, including contentions that those whom they claim may be held indefinitely could include U.S. citizens arrested on American soil, including arrests by members of the Armed Forces.
Originally Posted by Keif Sweat
Why not? Do you suspect he would shoot you?Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
none of this would have came out of your mouth if son walked by you
Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
Originally Posted by Keif Sweat
Why not? Do you suspect he would shoot you?Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
none of this would have came out of your mouth if son walked by you
no, I suspect Carver would not walk up to someone who is open carrying and proceed to say what he posted. would prob be more of a "run around the corner, dial 911, and post about it on NT" situation. dude in the video was obviously a rational law abiding citizen. I'm not afraid of guns or people with them unless given reason to be.
this thread is making me think of when they destroyed all the guns on Family Guy
what does morality have to do with this situationOriginally Posted by WHPH10
Originally Posted by Sleaze Jar Omens
no, I suspect Carver would not walk up to someone who is open carrying and proceed to say what he posted. would prob be more of a "run around the corner, dial 911, and post about it on NT" situation. dude in the video was obviously a rational law abiding citizen. I'm not afraid of guns or people with them unless given reason to be.
this thread is making me think of when they destroyed all the guns on Family Guy
Hahhahahhahhaa Carver can't defend morality when a gun is in his face. What a gaping vagina he is. And what an awesome dude the guy with the gun is. Herp derp.
yes you should, I mean really....what do you think will happen? Do people think their great nation will go up in flames if they can't keep their precious Glock?
