- 276
- 113
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
"One of the ideas featured a group of soldiers that were genetically crossed humans and dinosaurs. This was proposed by John Sayles in 2004 but has been scrapped." -IMDb
Nooooooo!
Official Jurassic World Thread | Jurassic World: Dominion 6/10/22
- 8,862
- 2,649
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
Same way I feel. I feel like a lot of big studios are getting lazy.Jurassic World could of at least brought that element into this movie a bit
- 4,139
- 827
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2014
Last edited:
- 3,009
- 581
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2007
I keep reading how people are disappointed with the cgi, could someone please point out to me the flaws that they see
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,460
- 15,818
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
I'm not worried about that, the movie isn't releasing next week... they have plenty of time to clean up some CGI.
- 43,065
- 27,885
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
I think people are setting their expectations too high for this.
Looks better than I thought it would. I've lost all faith in Hollywood. I'll check it out eventually.
Looks better than I thought it would. I've lost all faith in Hollywood. I'll check it out eventually.
- 2,928
- 1,311
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Yeah, couldn't see that one working. I'm obviously always willing to suspend some disbelief for sci-fi movies, but that sounds too much, especially in line with the other films.
- 11,411
- 5,368
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2007
I think for most people the expectation is high cause its a movie no one asked for. Jurassic park is a classic and one of the GOAT. No one really feels like they need to see more, everything is in that one movie,and alittle bonus with the second. After the third people just accepted that its all over.
With that said, we are now getting a movie that has to live up the greatness that is the original. It be like making another Jaws movie or a new ET, these movies are so great they can just be left alone and everyone is happy with that.
The trailer had up until the raptors, I just don't know how I feel about it. Other than that I just hope we get massive body counts in this one that was a ton of people looking like lunch in the trailer
- 17,198
- 8,793
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2003
Yeah teaming up with Raptors ruins it for me.
- 6,945
- 5,403
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2012
Dude probably reprogrammed the raptors to join his force and they going beast wars on em
- 19,910
- 9,574
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
It'd be one thing if we were made to believe they were just killing machines and nothing more. But it's been hammered over and over that they are highly intelligent. After a decade of existence (or however long this current park staff has been working with them), it's not crazy to think that someone like a Robert Muldoon would have some sort handle on them. If you recall in JP, Muldoon was downright terrified of them because they were still learning about them.
- 24,924
- 23,211
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2010
- 19,910
- 9,574
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
Trevorrow said the gate is CGI only in the trailer. It'll be real in the movie. That makes me think some of the gloss of the trailer won't be so glossy in the final product. Again, this is why you shouldn't complain about trailers six months before release. The movie isn't done yet.
- 24,924
- 23,211
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2010
- 7,832
- 8,464
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2011
I love the the tone of the trailer, will be watching it opening weekend.
- 73,112
- 59,874
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 945
- 469
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
I don't care how trained that raptor is I am not getting that close to one especially with my back towards it.
- 73,112
- 59,874
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 73,112
- 59,874
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Leaked Superbowl Trailer(s)
- 7,477
- 5,006
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
^ Nice.
- 73,112
- 59,874
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 16,413
- 8,760
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2012
More info on the genetically modified dinosaur in the movie:
http://www.jurassicworld.com/dinosaurs/indominus-rex/
http://www.jurassicworld.com/dinosaurs/indominus-rex/
Last edited:
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
The Lego toy box already showed what the dinosaur looked like
- 19,910
- 9,574
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2001
I went back and re-read both books over the holidays. A couple of the things people are complaining about are either directly mentioned, or at the very least, a foundation is provided. In the first book, they briefly mention a plan to train the dinosaurs. Also, there was the baby raptor in the nursery. It was implied that they were attempting to train such a smart, but vicious animal starting from birth. Also, Henry Wu talks in the first book about killing off the current batch of dinosaurs and altering the DNA of the next batch to make them slower (among other things).
They made a lot of modifications to the animals over time, and it's explored in The Lost World a lot more when they find old files in the lab that describe Wu's plan to genetically alter and create "new" dinos. In a way, the existence of Jurassic Park doesn't really make a whole lot of sense without the story of The Lost World. The sequel really drives home what Hammond was doing, and the premise of Jurassic World doesn't seem nearly as crazy as people are making it out to be. I think it's a logical next step that Crichton would be happy with.
Again, the execution could be awful and the movie could suck. But the premise is fine.
They made a lot of modifications to the animals over time, and it's explored in The Lost World a lot more when they find old files in the lab that describe Wu's plan to genetically alter and create "new" dinos. In a way, the existence of Jurassic Park doesn't really make a whole lot of sense without the story of The Lost World. The sequel really drives home what Hammond was doing, and the premise of Jurassic World doesn't seem nearly as crazy as people are making it out to be. I think it's a logical next step that Crichton would be happy with.
Again, the execution could be awful and the movie could suck. But the premise is fine.
- 43,402
- 42,952
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2013
The premise is MUCH better than "let's find a random kid that got lost" like they did with 3. The only real problem with this movie is that Jurassic park 1 was THAT good.
