C. Shaq>Jordan
Really? Because as far as I'm concerned the Pistons let Shaq get his and shut everyone else down, you think a Jordan led Bulls team during the 96' team would lose?
i don't nesscarily agree with dennii5 to the extent that Shaq by himself (figuratively) would demolish a team with Jordan on it but 01 Shaq > 96 Shaq
Yep, Luc Longley > Dikembe Mutumbo
Shaq would dominate down low, that's a given. But Longley and Wennington weren't completely worthless, not Longley at least. He didn't have Sam Perkins type range but he could stretch the D by hitting free throw line extended jumpers. He'd take a dump on Greg Foster any day.
Originally Posted by ill steelo
@ Shaq beating a team like '96 CHI by himself.
He's been swept/beaten in 5 in the past when putting up big numbers.
That Lakers team isn't good enough defensively to beat the '96 bulls.
Bottom line is, they had to win with dominant players at the same position. Shaq won with DWade, who carried that Miami team on his back.Originally Posted by aztec06jr
Originally Posted by Deuce King
Originally Posted by aztec06jr
More championships, more career points, more career playoff points, more career All-Star points, more All-Star appearances, more All-Star MVPs, after this Olympics he'll have more Gold medals, more All-NBA 1st teams (and All-NBA teams in general for that matter), more Finals appearances, more all NBA defensive teams (Shaq never made a 1st team), more scoring titles, 81 point game, etc don't lie either
You said alot right there champ, but they say a picture is worth a thousand words, so with that being said..................................
This picture accurately and perfectly describes the relationship of Shaq and Kobe while they played TOGETHER, which is what I was referring to, anything after that is...............just after that.
Could Shaq win without Kobe? Sure, he did it in Miami.
Could Kobe win without Shaq? Sure, he did it twice with Pau.
