NFL Discussion Thread - Hall of Fame Game: August 3rd

Status
Not open for further replies.
who led their team to the rose bowl? oh yeah RW

who had that better numbers? oh yeah RW


ok luck led his team to the orange bowl and fiesta bowl back to back bcs games... better numbers? luck was the runner up in the heisman 2 years in a row...

wasn't aware awards put numbers on the scoreboard.
I could of sworn you said to agree to disagree and not argue about this :lol: Your just like naughtyhare with your promises
 
I just hate seeing homers pick their QB over a better QB.


If you're a Saints fan or a Vikings fan saying you think Russell is better than Andrew....I would respect the opinion.

If you're a Seahawks fan saying Russell is better than Andrew, it's weak as hell. If Luck was the QB, you would say the same. It's cool to be a fan of your team but some of y'all are unreasonable.
 
I just hate seeing homers pick their QB over a better QB.


If you're a Saints fan or a Vikings fan saying you think Russell is better than Andrew....I would respect the opinion.

If you're a Seahawks fan saying Russell is better than Andrew, it's weak as hell. If Luck was the QB, you would say the same. It's cool to be a fan of your team but some of y'all are unreasonable.

No its not. Weak as hell would be saying Luck is better but only having Hypotheticals to back up your statement.
 
wasn't aware awards put numbers on the scoreboard.

I could of sworn you said to agree to disagree and not argue about this
laugh.gif
Your just like naughtyhare with your promises

that was until i saw that reamark about rw having a better college career
 
No its not. Weak as hell would be saying Luck is better but only having Hypotheticals to back up your statement.

i think its funny how these dudes say i stick up for luck and that he is my hero and all that, but when you say one thing about rw these dudes get super butt hurt, you would think rw gave them some sweet chin music or something
 
Last edited:
No its not. Weak as hell would be saying Luck is better but only having Hypotheticals to back up your statement.

i think its funny how these dudes say i stick up for luck and that he is my hero and all that, but when you say one thing about rw these dudes get super butt hurt, you would think rw gave them some sweet chin music or something

Everybody gets butt hurt once their qb is mentioned
Just watch

Tom Brady hasn't won anything without a camera
Peyton is a chocker
Aaron Rodgers wears his boxers backwards
 
Last edited:
No its not. Weak as hell would be saying Luck is better but only having Hypotheticals to back up your statement.
And then essentially discredit anything Hawks fans would have to say to counter, or even make an argument. Boy is a clown without a basis to support his opinion . 
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by coltfanb  

i think its funny how these dudes say i stick up for luck and that he is my hero and all that, but when you say one thing about rw these dudes get super butt hurt, you would think rw gave them some sweet chin music or something
laugh.gif
 Point out the butt hurt.  you're a clown as well -  just another dude who doesn't bring anything but a biased opinion and lame jokes to the topic at hand. Colts version of nawghtyhare.
 
Last edited:
who led their team to the rose bowl? oh yeah RW

who had that better numbers? oh yeah RW


ok luck led his team to the orange bowl and fiesta bowl back to back bcs games... better numbers? luck was the runner up in the heisman 2 years in a row...

wasn't aware awards put numbers on the scoreboard.
I could of sworn you said to agree to disagree and not argue about this :lol: Your just like naughtyhare with your promises

Dude I dont even have a dog in this fight but I dont know how one could possibly argue that Russell Wilson had a better college career. Take your homer glasses off for a minute man, geez.

Every single career average-type statistic favors Andrew Luck. Every last one of them. Yards per Attempt. Yards per completion. Completion percentage (this one isnt even close). TD-INT ratio. Quarterback Rating. Every single one of those stats favor Luck. The only statistics that Russell clearly has Luck beaten are the counting stats. 27 more touchdowns 2300 more passing yards. But it would be laughable to think Luck couldnt have thrown for 2300 yards and 27 touchdowns with the 425 more pass attempts that Wilson had.

I know you love your quarterback and all dude, but come on. Try to be objective for once. Who cares if your guy was slightly worse than Luck?
 
Last edited:
I think Luck will end up being a far better QB than RW. But it's not crazy to say Russell has been better so far imo, although you have to take into account how good Seattle is a whole.
 
Dude I dont even have a dog in this fight but I dont know how one could possibly argue that Russell Wilson had a better college career. Take your homer glasses off for a minute man, geez.

Every single career average-type statistic favors Andrew Luck. Every last one of them. Yards per Attempt. Yards per completion. Completion percentage (this one isnt even close). TD-INT ratio. Quarterback Rating. Every single one of those stats favor Luck. The only statistic that Russell clearly has Luck beaten is touchdowns by 27, but it would be laughable to think he couldnt have thrown 27 touchdowns with the 425 more pass attempts that Wilson had.

I know you love your quarterback and all dude, but come on. Try to be objective for once. Who cares if your guy was slightly worse than Luck?
**** all that the most importhant stat is Wins. Russel is a winne r
 
who led their team to the rose bowl? oh yeah RW

who had that better numbers? oh yeah RW


ok luck led his team to the orange bowl and fiesta bowl back to back bcs games... better numbers? luck was the runner up in the heisman 2 years in a row...

wasn't aware awards put numbers on the scoreboard.
I could of sworn you said to agree to disagree and not argue about this :lol: Your just like naughtyhare with your promises

Dude I dont even have a dog in this fight but I dont know how one could possibly argue that Russell Wilson had a better college career. Take your homer glasses off for a minute man, geez.

Every single career average-type statistic favors Andrew Luck. Every last one of them. Yards per Attempt. Yards per completion. Completion percentage (this one isnt even close). TD-INT ratio. Quarterback Rating. Every single one of those stats favor Luck. The only statistic that Russell clearly has Luck beaten is touchdowns by 27, but it would be laughable to think he couldnt have thrown 27 touchdowns with the 425 more pass attempts that Wilson had.

I know you love your quarterback and all dude, but come on. Try to be objective for once. Who cares if your guy was slightly worse than Luck?

Oh word?

700
 
I'd take Nick Foles over Luck and Russell Wilson in a heartbeat

in a tall contest
 
Last edited:
who led their team to the rose bowl? oh yeah RW

who had that better numbers? oh yeah RW


ok luck led his team to the orange bowl and fiesta bowl back to back bcs games... better numbers? luck was the runner up in the heisman 2 years in a row...

wasn't aware awards put numbers on the scoreboard.
I could of sworn you said to agree to disagree and not argue about this :lol: Your just like naughtyhare with your promises

Dude I dont even have a dog in this fight but I dont know how one could possibly argue that Russell Wilson had a better college career. Take your homer glasses off for a minute man, geez.

Every single career average-type statistic favors Andrew Luck. Every last one of them. Yards per Attempt. Yards per completion. Completion percentage (this one isnt even close). TD-INT ratio. Quarterback Rating. Every single one of those stats favor Luck. The only statistic that Russell clearly has Luck beaten is touchdowns by 27, but it would be laughable to think he couldnt have thrown 27 touchdowns with the 425 more pass attempts that Wilson had.

I know you love your quarterback and all dude, but come on. Try to be objective for once. Who cares if your guy was slightly worse than Luck?

Oh word?

700

Yeah. Word. Lol

You guys are arguing who had the better career, and you proceed to list season stats from 2011. Solid logic.
 
Guy yells at me for saying if......

........then says IF Russ was two inches taller he'd be.......


:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
dude is arguing two sides of the fence and sounding irrational as all hell

I feel like Ninjahood is talking
 
Dude I dont even have a dog in this fight but I dont know how one could possibly argue that Russell Wilson had a better college career. Take your homer glasses off for a minute man, geez.


Every single career average-type statistic favors Andrew Luck. Every last one of them. Yards per Attempt. Yards per completion. Completion percentage (this one isnt even close). TD-INT ratio. Quarterback Rating. Every single one of those stats favor Luck. The only statistic that Russell clearly has Luck beaten is touchdowns by 27, but it would be laughable to think he couldnt have thrown 27 touchdowns with the 425 more pass attempts that Wilson had.


I know you love your quarterback and all dude, but come on. Try to be objective for once. Who cares if your guy was slightly worse than Luck?


**** all that the most importhant stat is Wins. Russel is a winne r

All thats important are wins? Luck lost 7 games in three seasons in college. Wilson lost 21 games in four seasons.

More solid logic. Smh.
 
who led their team to the rose bowl? oh yeah RW

who had that better numbers? oh yeah RW


ok luck led his team to the orange bowl and fiesta bowl back to back bcs games... better numbers? luck was the runner up in the heisman 2 years in a row...

wasn't aware awards put numbers on the scoreboard.
I could of sworn you said to agree to disagree and not argue about this :lol: Your just like naughtyhare with your promises

Dude I dont even have a dog in this fight but I dont know how one could possibly argue that Russell Wilson had a better college career. Take your homer glasses off for a minute man, geez.

Every single career average-type statistic favors Andrew Luck. Every last one of them. Yards per Attempt. Yards per completion. Completion percentage (this one isnt even close). TD-INT ratio. Quarterback Rating. Every single one of those stats favor Luck. The only statistic that Russell clearly has Luck beaten is touchdowns by 27, but it would be laughable to think he couldnt have thrown 27 touchdowns with the 425 more pass attempts that Wilson had.

I know you love your quarterback and all dude, but come on. Try to be objective for once. Who cares if your guy was slightly worse than Luck?

Oh word?

700

Yeah. Word. Lol

You guys are arguing who had the better career, and you proceed to list season stats from 2011. Solid logic.

Ok. fine. Wilson had the clear better senior season. you happy mate?
 
Guy yells at me for saying if......

........then says IF Russ was two inches taller he'd be.......


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Apples and Oranges. You clowns with no facts to back up your claims say "If" wilson played for the colts blah blah blah
People with facts are saying these number show why so far Wilson has been the better player. And stating a source from a scout that says Wilson's height is the only reason he wasn't looked at to highly.
I don't think there is a source of a scout saying if luck played in seattle he would put up better numbers than Wilson
 
C CP1708

How you feel about today's firing ?

Justifiable ?

Considering the cloud over the teams head and the shakey Oline play?

Not sure if it's a good look for Tanne.

More than justifiable. Any OC that routinely calls for Daniel Thomas sweeps on 3rd and 1 should be fired before the next snap.

My only issue is he alone is not enough. The GM, HC, and DC all have let us down. They need to tear them all down or we'll be goin thru this all over again in early 2015.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom