- 36
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2006
Durant...but Oden was more fitting for the Blazers
Oden or Durant?
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by belle155,
- Start date
- 4,153
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
it depends on the type of team you have on who i would take. durant is a ball dominating scorer while oden is a defensive big. id say its a lot harder to finda good big man than it is to find a scoring guard. i would take oden if i had to choose though
- 3,500
- 463
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2004
KD from UT
- 17,246
- 73
- Joined
- May 19, 2004
Well an "Oden" of course is unknown right now, but if he's billed up to what people are saying he is, he is clearly more valuable and a rarercommodity than Durant. there are many scorers, but few dominating bigs. Oden could end up being a stiff that sucks, but that won't be known until 5-6 yearspass (if u believe that he isn't 45 years old already). POTENTIALLY....Oden is more valuable to a team. If I wanted the "sure" thing of courseDurant is your guy, but if you wanna take a high risk high reward thing, Oden is the guy.
- 16,310
- 129
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2007
Durant. he's doing much better than i expected.
- 155,699
- 135,048
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2001
