2013 College Football Thread (Realer than Real Deal Holyfield -->S/O Craftsy)

Corey you guys might have the coolest coach in college football down there in Arcandsaw.

 
If Michael Dyer enroll at Louisville they may actually end up in the title game. Gotta check these Vegas odds on them.
 
GUNNA GET IT said:
If Michael Dyer enroll at Louisville they may actually end up in the title game. Gotta check these Vegas odds on them.
Click to expand...

Alabama +320
Ohio State +625
Oregon +1000
Texas A&M +1450
LSU +2000
Georgia +2300
Louisville +2500
Florida State +2600
Stanford +2700
Clemson +3000
Florida +3200
South Carolina +3400
Texas +3500
Miami +4500
Oklahoma State +5000
USC +5000
Oklahoma +6000
Nebraska +6000
Michigan +6500
Notre Dame +7500
 
ShannonsCrooks said:
So that UGA OLineman who was just reinstated, does he only have 1 year of eligibility left?
Click to expand...
He has 2 years to play and can/will appeal for a 3rd. He hasn't played in over 3 years 
mean.gif
 (Bama wouldv'e BEEN forced him out) but he's been doing workouts with the team since May so he's ready to go, just needs to knock off some rust

 
Nako XL said:
Corey you guys might have the coolest coach in college football down there in Arcandsaw.
Click to expand...
Nobody is touching having a sidepiece on a bike and wrecking, but BB is pretty cool :lol:



Almost done :pimp:

Not expecting much from Arkansas this year. .500 at best.

I'll be attending more Buckeye games than Razorback games this season.

edit - Didn't like that boosters wouldn't let Dyer walk-on, but it is what it is.
 
Last edited:
Kolton Houston on College Football Live and Outside The Lines today. 3:00 and 3:30est

Gunna where is that quote on Malone from?

youneedmorepeople.jpg
 
Last edited:
WITNESSkb24 said:
No because realistically if Bama loses OSU would move to number one and the farthest I could see them drop is 2. Your weak schedule argument will only go so far, fact is they'd be an undefeated team in a BCS conference and I highly doubt they'd be passed over for a one loss team. Not to mention they'd bring ratings
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter. The AP voters are heavily SEC biased, and will def count against you for the SOS.


And then you're going to take a massive hit on the computer part of the BCS. Computers don't like teams with weak schedules. And unless there is some surprise team on your schedule that breaks out you're going to have zero signature wins.
 
dreClark said:
Alabama +320
Ohio State +625
Oregon +1000
Texas A&M +1450
LSU +2000
Georgia +2300
Louisville +2500
Florida State +2600
Stanford +2700
Clemson +3000
Florida +3200
South Carolina +3400
Texas +3500
Miami +4500
Oklahoma State +5000
USC +5000
Oklahoma +6000
Nebraska +6000
Michigan +6500
Notre Dame +7500
Click to expand...
these the odds they win or get to the title game?

if its just get to the title game some of these are

decent bets
 
Fournette apparently isn't traveling up to A2 for the BBQ despite his father telling Sam Webb they had their tickets and were getting ready to fly out Thursday. Kind of odd but I knew the chances of pulling him are very slim. Would hurt our chances for Damien Harris next year too.

I need Clemson and UF to fill up on '15 WR so George Campbell ends up at Michigan.
 
Last edited:
Fear The Ibis said:
It doesn't matter. The AP voters are heavily SEC biased, and will def count against you for the SOS.


And then you're going to take a massive hit on the computer part of the BCS. Computers don't like teams with weak schedules. And unless there is some surprise team on your schedule that breaks out you're going to have zero signature wins.
Click to expand...

:smh:

I guess we will just have to let the season play out
 
How do we know what a weak or strong schedule is before the season even plays out?

Last yr you woild have thought auburn or arkansas were top talents until they actually had to play
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom