3
39478
Guest
DAT seems to like their chances... but what person on any team would say, "We're going to lose this weekend" to a press member...
2013 College Football Thread (Realer than Real Deal Holyfield -->S/O Craftsy)
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by gunna get it,
- Start date
DAT seems to like their chances... but what person on any team would say, "We're going to lose this weekend" to a press member...
- 43,469
- 8,335
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
Stanford losing that DE was a big loss
Wayne Lyons is gonna be targeted a lot me thinks
Wayne Lyons is gonna be targeted a lot me thinks
Lunden
formerly pleasesaythebaby23
- 7,208
- 1,066
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
Sooooo
Beat Clemson and Miami, they are overrated.
But we beat Washington and UCLA...............................................................................
But when we beat Stanford, then that'll show everyone..........cuz Stanford is so great they lost to Utah.
This the same scorecard you all got? I read everything correctly right? This was said?
Yea the one that says if we win out we will be in the title game
that BCS scorecard
Yeah, pretty sure that's not guaranteed.
What if Florida State wins out? What if Stanford and UCLA, etc take more losses, but Clemson and Miami add more wins?
You can win out, and still get jumped by Florida State. Not saying it will happen, just that it can happen.
What if Florida State wins out? What if Stanford and UCLA, etc take more losses, but Clemson and Miami add more wins?
You can win out, and still get jumped by Florida State. Not saying it will happen, just that it can happen.
- 19,563
- 6,838
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2009
why do people act like Oregon wasn't putting up points on Stanford before last year?
I read this morning that their DE was going to play. (name escapes me)
Maybe he just suits up, plays a snap and then comes off the field, but at least makes Oregon prep for him, something like that?
- 11,611
- 1,134
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
What was the time for Dorset's return again?,4-6,weeks right?
- 28,043
- 10,465
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
Ben Gardner is out for the season. Torn pec.
I'm 99% sure Stanford holds Ducks under 35 points. Can Hogan produce enough to win though.
I'm 99% sure Stanford holds Ducks under 35 points. Can Hogan produce enough to win though.
- 43,469
- 8,335
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2005
Last edited:
- 9,622
- 783
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
Even if Stanford can hold Oregon under 35 where are they gonna get 35 points from?
- 28,043
- 10,465
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
Montgomery and Whitfield have to make a play or two.
Hogan has only one loss as a starter I believe.
Pound the rock for TOP. Keep Ducks off the field. Limit mistakes/turnovers.
Skov has to call/play a perfect game without Gardner.
Hogan has only one loss as a starter I believe.
Pound the rock for TOP. Keep Ducks off the field. Limit mistakes/turnovers.
Skov has to call/play a perfect game without Gardner.
- 13,655
- 1,083
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2006
You see what you want to see,
- 28,043
- 10,465
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
It's going to be ugly. Oregon will have to grind, show resiliency.
They'd need a defensive score, special teams type TD, or turnover deep in Oregon territory, stuff like that.
The usual ways for an underdog to steal a game. Rn the ball, control the clock for 40 minutes, etc.
Stanford has to play perfect, the Ducks do not. Only thing Stanford will have goin for it is homefield. That's about it.
The usual ways for an underdog to steal a game. Rn the ball, control the clock for 40 minutes, etc.
Stanford has to play perfect, the Ducks do not. Only thing Stanford will have goin for it is homefield. That's about it.
- 28,043
- 10,465
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
David Shaw is an advantage.
- 11,611
- 1,134
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
This dumbass Dan sileo got fired again for saying he'll give a 1000 dollars to somebody who knocks freeman out the game. But I think Dorset will be back by the Virginia game who has our number and is a team we can't ever beat.
- 30,498
- 5,958
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
They really send us to play a 10-2 Stanford team in Pasadena :x
- 9,622
- 783
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2009
Poor Ohio State. That playoff can't come fast enough.
3
39478
Guest
Basically. This is what happened last year. Stanford played pretty well and Oregon played really poor on the same night. In the SEC, it'd be a smashmouth, grown-man football game, or something stupid like that.
The biggest difference I see this year is the improved passing game with Mariota, Huff, Addison, Mundt/Brown, etc. I think we'll see more of DAT at slot (like he was in 2011) and run the rock with Marshall and Tyner with DAT mixed in. DAT may start at RB, but my guess is he moves to slot and motion plays the majority of the game.
Been waiting for this game since last year. I was so bummed when they lost, as they would have wiped ND and won the national championship (then again, who wouldn't have...). Oregon plays really well on the road and they haven't lost since 2009 to... yeah, you guessed it, Stanford. That team was very different than it is now, with a better offense (Luck, Gerhart) and not so solid defense.
It should be a great game and I'm looking forward to seeing how it plays out given what's on the line.
- 11,611
- 1,134
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2013
What's OSU OOC look like next year? I know ours is **** except for Nebraska who will probably be ****
- 28,043
- 10,465
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2004
Va. Tech at the Shoe.
- 30,498
- 5,958
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2011
Lunden
formerly pleasesaythebaby23
- 7,208
- 1,066
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
This and all of this
but for some reason I feel like we are gonna cruise past Stanford and Utah or Arizona is gonna give us a fight