Did anyone just watch Clint Eastwood's speech? - Page 3
- Boys Noize
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 5,251 Posts. Joined 5/2009
- Location: Brooklyn, New York
- Reputation: 140
- Select All Posts By This User
- cartune
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 11,846 Posts. Joined 2/2009
- Reputation: 426
- Select All Posts By This User
- Joe Cool23
- Trader Feedback: 0
- online
- 3,623 Posts. Joined 2/2007
- Location: The Mothership
- Reputation: 59
- Select All Posts By This User
- YeOld360s
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 617 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Reputation: 103
- Select All Posts By This User
- LuckyLuchiano
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 10,566 Posts. Joined 5/2003
- Reputation: 363
- Select All Posts By This User
- sole vintage
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 5,528 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Reputation: 480
- Select All Posts By This User
- DubA169
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 23,713 Posts. Joined 11/2003
- Reputation: 316
- Select All Posts By This User
- Mo Matik
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 3,779 Posts. Joined 8/2005
- Reputation: 57
- Select All Posts By This User
That being the case, I wouldn't be too upset of Mitt and his big money pals pulled this off and stole this election. In the long run, it may force America as a whole to reexamine the current election process sooner rather than later.
- DubA169
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 23,713 Posts. Joined 11/2003
- Reputation: 316
- Select All Posts By This User
This guy is somethubg else
And why woukd u want a business man as president? Businesses are about making money not morality. This guy was buying companies, firing everybody, and getting rich off misery
- NazDrowie
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,388 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Reputation: 221
- Select All Posts By This User
if you combine the first two letters of Eastwood's first name and the last three letters of Romney's first name...
They got the power, they got the speed
To be the best in the National League
Well this is the year and the Cubs are real
So come on down to Wrigley Field
They got the power, they got the speed
To be the best in the National League
Well this is the year and the Cubs are real
So come on down to Wrigley Field
- kdawg
- Trader Feedback: 0
-
finestmuffinsandbagels
-
- offline
- 14,619 Posts. Joined 6/2003
- Reputation: 158
- Select All Posts By This User
- FutureMD
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 6,607 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Reputation: 1529
- Select All Posts By This User
- November 5, 2008, 9:16 AM ET
Barack Obama: The U.S.’s 44th President (and 25th Lawyer-President!)
ByDan Slater

After Barack Obama’s smashing defeat of GOP nominee John McCain in the Electoral College and his crossing of one of the most formidable racial barriers the country has confronted, even harder work begins.
As Obama suggested in his acceptance speech last night, a long road lies ahead. Commentators, grasping for parallels, compare his arrival in the Oval Office to Abraham Lincoln (a self-taught lawyer) encountering the Civil War and Franklin D. Roosevelt (Harvard, Columbia law) coming to Washington amid the Great Depression.
We won’t predict his success, but we will point out that Obama’s Harvard law degree puts him in the company of our 19th president, Rutherford Hayes (Kenyon College, Harvard law), the only other president — believe it or not — to hold a JD from the Law School. Below is a complete list of our lawyer-presidents.
#2 — John Adams (Harvard, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#3 — Thomas Jefferson (College of William & Mary, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#4 — James Madison (College of New Jersey — now Princeton — then read law)
#6 — John Quincy Adams (Harvard, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#7 — Andrew Jackson (self-taught lawyer)
#8 — Martin Van Buren (Kinderhook Academy, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#10 — John Tyler (College of William & Mary, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#11 — James Polk (University of North Carolina, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#13 — Millard Fillmore (clerked for and studied under New York Judge Walter Wood)
#14 — Franklin Pierce (Bowdoin College, then studied law)
#15 — James Buchanan (Dickinson College, then studied law)
#16 — Abraham Lincoln (No formal education, a self-taught lawyer)
#19 — Rutherford Hayes (Kenyon College, Harvard law)
#21 — Chester Arthur (Union College, then studied law)
#22 — Grover Cleveland (apprenticed as a lawyer)
#23 — Benjamin Harrison (Miami University in Ohio, then studied law)
#25 — William McKinley (Allegheny College, Albany law)
#27 — William Howard Taft (Yale, Cincinnati law)
#28 — Woodrow Wilson (College of New Jersey — now Princeton — then UVA law)
#30 — Calvin Coolidge (Amherst, then apprenticed as a lawyer)
#32 — Franklin Roosevelt (Harvard, Columbia law)
#37 — Richard Nixon (Whittier College, Duke law)
#38 — Gerald Ford (University of Michigan, Yale law)
#42 — Bill Clinton (Georgetown University, Yale law)
#44 — Barack Obama (Columbia, Harvard law)
NOTE: Our 33rd president, Harry Truman, was the only president who served after 1897 not to earn a college degree. However he did study law for two years at the Kansas City Law School, now the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law. We’ll also point out that Warren Harding, our 29th president, enjoyed great success as a journalist before rising to the White House, yet, sadly, never became a lawyer.
Correction: Earlier versions of this post incorrectly stated that Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Jackson were not lawyers. An earlier version also incorrectly included Theodore Roosevelt in the list of lawyer-presidents. Roosevelt left Columbia law school before graduating.
- FutureMD
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 6,607 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Reputation: 1529
- Select All Posts By This User
- WaddupDoe
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 172 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Location: Safari
- Reputation: 23
- Select All Posts By This User
- NazDrowie
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,388 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Reputation: 221
- Select All Posts By This User
i know, i know
...it was a poor attempt at the lulz
@ myself.
They got the power, they got the speed
To be the best in the National League
Well this is the year and the Cubs are real
So come on down to Wrigley Field
They got the power, they got the speed
To be the best in the National League
Well this is the year and the Cubs are real
So come on down to Wrigley Field
- sole vintage
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 5,528 Posts. Joined 4/2008
- Reputation: 480
- Select All Posts By This User
- Deuce King
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 12,779 Posts. Joined 7/2005
- Reputation: 362
- Select All Posts By This User
Indeed. By far the worst political speech of all-time, and by far one of if not the worst conventions of all-time. Also, the Republican party is so bad and out of touch that they have white people holding up signs saying "Hispanics for Romney". Just goes to show how low some Republicans will stoop.
XVI . XIX . XXIII . XXIV . XXIX
Team Member #2, The Dynasty will return
Team
DC/MD/VA
Cough up a lung..Where Im From!!
O.G. Member #5
XVI . XIX . XXIII . XXIV . XXIX
Team Member #2, The Dynasty will return
Team
DC/MD/VA
Cough up a lung..Where Im From!!
O.G. Member #5
- JesusShuttlesworth34
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 7,508 Posts. Joined 6/2001
- Location: NCR
- Reputation: 1351
- Select All Posts By This User
- 3sTheLuckyNumbe
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 355 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Location: Ask your girl, she knows...
- Reputation: 59
- Select All Posts By This User
- ScarsOrScabs
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,569 Posts. Joined 10/2004
- Reputation: 388
- Select All Posts By This User
And even:
That people will rally around something, no matter how awful it is, as long as the general purpose fits their beliefs. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing, you tried to tell me what I said was FALSE, that Democrats wouldn't have had the same reaction and I believe you're absolutely incorrect. Nothing wrong with debating, if you're even tuned into and have an opinion on anything political, you should be prepared for that.
It might be a little much but to me that speech is an example of what's wrong with these campaigns.
- dyyhard
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 28,381 Posts. Joined 11/2002
- Reputation: 64
- Select All Posts By This User
- Boys Noize
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 5,251 Posts. Joined 5/2009
- Location: Brooklyn, New York
- Reputation: 140
- Select All Posts By This User

You're corny dude. I can only speak for myself because I said that in this thread but my only reasoning was to make it clear that my comments have nothing to do with political leanings...and they especially don't have to do with race.
I was just giving a response to comments like:
And even:
That people will rally around something, no matter how awful it is, as long as the general purpose fits their beliefs. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing, you tried to tell me what I said was FALSE, that Democrats wouldn't have had the same reaction and I believe you're absolutely incorrect. Nothing wrong with debating, if you're even tuned into and have an opinion on anything political, you should be prepared for that.
It might be a little much but to me that speech is an example of what's wrong with these campaigns.
I think you're wrong. As far as I can remember, I don't recall a time Democrats have rallied around someone saying something this outlandish and off-base.
If you know of any incident where this has happened, I'd be open to listening/reading about it.
- Oh YoU MaD
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 13,308 Posts. Joined 10/2007
- Reputation: 1318
- Select All Posts By This User
- AirCommanderMarsFiend
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,803 Posts. Joined 7/2007
- Reputation: 29
- Select All Posts By This User

Let's be real, had that speech been made at the DNC, Democrats would've been enthralled and Republicans would laugh at him. People are so blinded by their political leanings.
I've voted in every election since I turned 18 and I'm leaning towards sitting this one out. I don't believe in either candidate and I voted for Obama in 08, believing in his many empty promises in part because we needed someone other than George W. You can call me what you want but I don't believe McCain would've had us in better shape either plus you can't tell me choosing Sarah Palin was anything but a desperate attempt to sway voters.
These candidates don't have the best interest of the majority in mind, they just want power by any means necessary, even if it includes putting a movie star with no redeeming value on stage to make some rah rah speech.
*Rock GIF* (I'm still voting for Obama because he seems like the lesser of two evils)
-We Eat Steel For Breakfast-
-We Eat Steel For Breakfast-
- trueprada
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,552 Posts. Joined 5/2012
- Reputation: 76
- Select All Posts By This User
- ScarsOrScabs
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 1,569 Posts. Joined 10/2004
- Reputation: 388
- Select All Posts By This User


You're corny dude. I can only speak for myself because I said that in this thread but my only reasoning was to make it clear that my comments have nothing to do with political leanings...and they especially don't have to do with race.
I was just giving a response to comments like:
And even:
That people will rally around something, no matter how awful it is, as long as the general purpose fits their beliefs. It's not a Republican/Democrat thing, you tried to tell me what I said was FALSE, that Democrats wouldn't have had the same reaction and I believe you're absolutely incorrect. Nothing wrong with debating, if you're even tuned into and have an opinion on anything political, you should be prepared for that.
It might be a little much but to me that speech is an example of what's wrong with these campaigns.
I think you're wrong. As far as I can remember, I don't recall a time Democrats have rallied around someone saying something this outlandish and off-base.
If you know of any incident where this has happened, I'd be open to listening/reading about it.
- 703 Hwy
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 8,163 Posts. Joined 10/2007
- Reputation: 140
- Select All Posts By This User
- FutureMD
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 6,607 Posts. Joined 7/2012
- Reputation: 1529
- Select All Posts By This User
- Boys Noize
- Trader Feedback: 0
- offline
- 5,251 Posts. Joined 5/2009
- Location: Brooklyn, New York
- Reputation: 140
- Select All Posts By This User

I'm not saying it has happened but if the situations were reversed and Eastwood was up there in 08 at the DNC talking about G W's failures and promises, talking to him in a chair, Democrats would've cheered him there too, to think otherwise is foolish. It's not even about content anymore, so much of what these candidates state in terms of statistics and pointing out their opposition's performance are factually untrue but that doesn't prevent people from giving standing ovations as long as it's what they want to hear.
So you're not saying the Democrats have ever actually done something similar.... but you're saying IF they did, it'd be the same?
See, what I'm not getting is how you came to this conclusion.
It's purely hypothetical. You're trying to equate these two parties as if they've done and said equally outlandish and off-base things. You see where I'm getting at? The GOP and associated conservative groups have a proven track record of flat out lying and making things up. I think to equate the two through hypothetical situations is unfair.It's not about content? A lot of people are ridiculing Clint because of content. He was rambling and talking to an invisible chair. Come on.
And it's not just Clint. We haven't even touched on Paul Ryan and his acceptance speech. Even a columnist from Fox News (albeit their most progressive voice) called him out for flat out lying and making things up.
- Did anyone just watch Clint Eastwood's speech?
Recent Discussions
- › Sacramento Kings off-season thread | A New Era 2 seconds ago
- › Air Jordan 5 "Grape" Aftermath Thread (No Buying/Selling or Trading) 9 seconds ago
- › damn, Nicki strutting her stuff at the Billboard Music Awards 15 seconds ago
- › Free Run+ 2 & iD - NSW iDs (Trail-inspired) NOW UP! 27 seconds ago
- › How long would you last in prison? 43 seconds ago
- › Official NBA 2012-2013 Season Thread 1 minute ago
- › Air Jordan 1 High “Black Toe” – 2013 1 minute ago
- › **CHIEF KEEF** 2 minutes ago
- › movie theatre etiquette vol worst movie experiences 2 minutes ago
- › CHICKS THAT TRIP OVER KICKS... 2 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Air Jordan VI Retro 2000 by ShawnCash757
- › Jordan IV Retro "White/Cement" (2012 Release) by ThatUncutRaw
- › Jordan CP Too Quick - Mens - White/Concord/Black by balleaglespist
- › Air Jordan XX QS by thuglife67898
- › Jordan XIV Retro Black Toes by thuglife67898
- › Air Jordan 5 Retro Fire Red by thuglife67898
- › adidas Originals Samba - Mens - Black/White/Gum by raburns04
- › Nike Air Penny II - Mens - Soar/Cyber by beh235
- › Charles Barkley Nike Air Force 180 - Mens - White/Midnight... by beh235
- › Jordan CP3.VI - Mens - White/Gym Red/Midnight Navy by UsedToBeCool
New Articles
- › Mobile Quick Start Guide by Methodical Management
- › Air Jordan VI & VII Golden Moments Pack by Methodical Management
- › West, Kanye by NikeTalk Admin
- › Sanders, Deion by NikeTalk Admin
- › Jones, Roy (Jr.) by NikeTalk Admin
- › Jeter, Derek by NikeTalk Admin
- › Jackson, Bo by NikeTalk Admin
- › Griffey, Ken by NikeTalk Admin
- › Armstrong, Lance by kdawg
- › Westbrook, Russell by NikeTalk Admin
About NikeTalk | Join the Community | Advertise
NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not reflect those of Nike Inc.
© 2013 NikeTalk is powered by Huddler Fashion & Lifestyle | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map











