Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread

[v8erman]

Vegas 1s had better quality than all the 2013s and nobody wanted those. Thats a shame. If all the 2013 had that quality, there wouldnt be a conversation.

 

[shenggg]

anyone mind do a legit check for these royals? going to but these just making sure they are legit. 

http://niketalk.com/t/611144/2013-royal-1-legit-check-fomr-thesekickscray-on-ebay#post_21929967

 

[cheddaman]

 

[ocjays23]

I s this your pic?

 

[cheddaman]

I s this your pic?

no

 

[ryanjumpman420]

nice pic shadows are dope. What else is there to say? lol.

 

[lovehateself]

 

So you actually think the leather quality are the same on all NA1's? 

I'm not going through this again. It's a stupid topic to begin with. They all retailed for the same price.

bruh, just cause the shoes retailed for the same price doesnt mean they all came from the same batch of leather...

the jeters were priced at 140 then raised to 160, but that doesnt mean the leather quality was better...

all it takes to determine an opinion is to have the shoes in hand and see for yourself...

consensus is that black toes had the worst quality of black/reds/, royals and shadows ...and well you can add the black/whites to the list as well

 

[Bert.]

Came in earlier today. After comparing to breds, these do seem better quality. Just my opinion.. and for $135 shipped, cant complain

$135? howwwww?

 

[lovehateself]

 

Came in earlier today. After comparing to breds, these do seem better quality. Just my opinion.. and for $135 shipped, cant complain

 

$135? howwwww?

 really doe

 

[endeesee]

hook line and sinker

 

[scroller52]

hoping to cop on ndc for $126 come RD

 

[seandon23]

imo i think the quality of leather is royals>shadows/black/reds>black toes i have to see again about the shadows but there isn't that much of a difference between the leather used on any of them to really debate anything lol

 

[pelimpe]

Them cps up there are clean imo.... Hope they slept on so i can copp fr the low.....

 

[ryanjumpman420]

imo i think the quality of leather is royals>shadows/black/reds>black toes i have to see again about the shadows but there isn't that much of a difference between the leather used on any of them to really debate anything lol

Seriously man, folks up in here be catching feelings for real bout their fake leather $140 shoes. lovehateself I've already blocked you, stop following me around quoting me u nut. Ur bout as lame as they come.

 

[squatchnt]

They only difference I've noticed is the texture on Shadows. Didn't notice it until someone else pointed it out, and then I had to put them side by side with Breds and Royals to acknowledge it.

 

[shenggg]

seems like im off topic but im so stoked that im getting royals haha.

 

[lovehateself]

mr "different paintjobs" 

 

[ryanjumpman420]

mr "different paintjobs" 

Sorry I dont take my fake leather shoes as seriously as u do.

 

[shenggg]

Sorry I dont take my fake leather shoes as seriously as u do.

the leather on jordans are not fake. they are just cheap genuine leather. but the LMs are real nice leather, like those on way of wades./ 

 

[mcking]

I'm not going through this again. It's a stupid topic to begin with. They all retailed for the same price.

I'm with you. There's no way in hell nike going to go out of their way to retain a different type of leather per colorway especially at the same retail price. People are just looking into it WAY too much. 

 

[davinci]

 

looks like a deer is wearing shadows

i can't see past those joggers 

 

[nyknicks207]

 
I'm with you. There's no way in hell nike going to go out of their way to retain a different type of leather per colorway especially at the same retail price. People are just looking into it WAY too much. 

Not necessarily... Retail on the Sport blue 6s and Spizike 6s were both $170 and the quality on the spizike 6s are a million times better. Lance mountain 1s and all these other og 1 colorways retailed for the same and quality isn't even comparable. I can go on and on

 

[ryanjumpman420]

Not necessarily... Retail on the Sport blue 6s and Spizike 6s were both $170 and the quality on the spizike 6s are a million times better. Lance mountain 1s and all these other og 1 colorways retailed for the same and quality isn't even comparable. I can go on and on

Spizikes had tumbled leather for one, same as the infrared 23 6s. Cant compare the Spizikes to the OG colorway 6s this year which all have leather that is exactly the same.

 

[mcking]

 
Not necessarily... Retail on the Sport blue 6s and Spizike 6s were both $170 and the quality on the spizike 6s are a million times better. Lance mountain 1s and all these other og 1 colorways retailed for the same and quality isn't even comparable. I can go on and on

Spizikes had tumbled leather for one, same as the infrared 23 6s. Cant compare the Spizikes to the OG colorway 6s this year which all have leather that is exactly the same.

Exactly. Tumbled leather vs non-tumbled doesn't mean better quality just different texture. 

I have lance mountains, royals, and breds. There is nothing significant about each quality of the shoe. The leather is being treated much differently on the lance mountains vs the royals/breds with the coloring process. 

 

[nyknicks207]

Spizikes had tumbled leather for one, same as the infrared 23 6s. Cant compare the Spizikes to the OG colorway 6s this year which all have leather that is exactly the same.

Lol the spizike 6s aren't all tumbled leather. Regardless, the quality on the spizike 6s are way better than the infrared 23 as well. Compare the smooth leather portion of the spizike 6s to the sport blue 6s steel toe. No contest. Point is that JB does what it wants and you can't say that quality is the same for all shoes that retail the same. Spizike 6s have better quality than the champagnes and they retailed for $80 less