***Official Political Discussion Thread***

 
DDMTpb3XYAApB9p.jpg

Eric Trump says DNC chair is a ‘nut job’: My father ‘accomplished more than any president in history’

He's got that white supremacist haircut too.

Hitler youth
 
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...ational-parks-privatized-trump-administration

America’s national parks need a staggering $11.5bn worth of overdue road and infrastructure repairs. But with the proposed National Park Service budget slashed by almost $400m, the Trump administration says it will turn to privatizing public park services to address those deferred maintenance costs.

“I don’t want to be in the business of running campgrounds,” Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said at a meeting of the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association in Washington this month. This came after Donald Trump proposed cutting the Department of the Interior budget by 13%

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/05/public-lands-uranium-mining-arizona-grand-canyon

A coalition of influential officials in Arizona and Utah is urging the Trump administration to consider rolling back Obama-era environmental protections that ban new uranium mining near the Grand Canyon.

They argue that the 20-year ban that came into effect in 2012 is unlawful and stifles economic opportunity in the mining industry. But supporters of the ban say new mining activity could increase the risk of uranium-contaminated water flowing into the canyon. Past mining in the region has left hundreds of polluted sites among Arizona’s Navajo population, leading to serious health consequences, including cancer and kidney failure
 
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/05/public-lands-uranium-mining-arizona-grand-canyon

A coalition of influential officials in Arizona and Utah is urging the Trump administration to consider rolling back Obama-era environmental protections that ban new uranium mining near the Grand Canyon.

They argue that the 20-year ban that came into effect in 2012 is unlawful and stifles economic opportunity in the mining industry. But supporters of the ban say new mining activity could increase the risk of uranium-contaminated water flowing into the canyon. Past mining in the region has left hundreds of polluted sites among Arizona’s Navajo population, leading to serious health consequences, including cancer and kidney failure



700
 
600


If he's so against 'theocratic despotism',why do they still kiss The Saudi's behinds without pause?

The great irony here is that the wwhole situation in Iran is a result of US/CIA funded and supported regime change when Iran was actually a thriving democracy over 60 years ago. They deposed their democratically elected PM in favor of reinstalling the Shahs and the rest is history...

Nothing but chickens coming home to roost

Mr Cotton is definitely counting on people's ignorance of history to get to talk out of both sides of his mouth without consequence :lol:
 
Last edited:
This dude from the Brookings institute has had a habit of tweeting out "tick tick" before every big Comey story broke,he tweeted it again today...:nerd:

 
This dude from the Brookings institute has had a habit of tweeting out "tick tick" before every big Comey story broke,he tweeted it again today...:nerd:



They were rumors that the Sugar Bigot was tweeting nonsense this weekend to create a story to distract from something dropping this week.

WaPo and NYT might be ready to throw oops to each other again.
 
600


If he's so against 'theocratic despotism',why do they still kiss The Saudi's behinds without pause?

The great irony here is that the wwhole situation in Iran is a result of US/CIA funded and supported regime change when Iran was actually a thriving democracy over 60 years ago. They deposed their democratically elected PM in favor of reinstalling the Shahs and the rest is history...

Nothing but chickens coming home to roost

Mr Cotton is definitely counting on people's ignorance of history to get to talk out of both sides of his mouth without consequence :lol:

:lol: @ Cotton trying to make a moral argument for the invasion of Iran. It's almost like the AHCA thing is not happening. It's almost like the fusion of Church and State is not happening.

The rest of the world knows the US no longer has a moral high ground, but Muricans who believe what Cotton is spewing are still obscured by the veil of "exceptionalism."
 
 
If he's so against 'theocratic despotism',why do they still kiss The Saudi's behinds without pause?

The great irony here is that the wwhole situation in Iran is a result of US/CIA funded and supported regime change when Iran was actually a thriving democracy over 60 years ago. They deposed their democratically elected PM in favor of reinstalling the Shahs and the rest is history...

Nothing but chickens coming home to roost

Mr Cotton is definitely counting on people's ignorance of history to get to talk out of both sides of his mouth without consequence
laugh.gif
laugh.gif
@ Cotton trying to make a moral argument for the invasion of Iran. It's almost like the AHCA thing is not happening. It's almost like the fusion of Church and State is not happening.

The rest of the world knows the US no longer has a moral high ground, but Muricans who believe what Cotton is spewing are still obscured by the veil of "exceptionalism."
Tom Cotton is only 40 years old, but talks he's in his 70s. Further proof that the "younger" Republicans aren't any different than the old ***** who've been around for decades.
 
Given the things they say,they really do expect people to be as ignorant as possible and not check them on their BS
This dude from the Brookings institute has had a habit of tweeting out "tick tick" before every big Comey story broke,he tweeted it again today...:nerd:



They were rumors that the Sugar Bigot was tweeting nonsense this weekend to create a story to distract from something dropping this week.

WaPo and NYT might be ready to throw oops to each other again.

magic-johnson-eating-popcorn.gif


The NYT and WaPo were looking like prime Wade and Bron last month :lol: :nerd:
 
Last edited:
SCOTUS ruled that they will hear the travel ban case in the fall until then it is partially reinstated

It you have ties to someone or something in the US will be allowed to enter, if not they can block you.

Expect the fragile Orange Bigot to act like he got a big win.

And expect his Stans, you be in here today because they finally have trolling material
 
https://www.theguardian.com/environ...ational-parks-privatized-trump-administration

America’s national parks need a staggering $11.5bn worth of overdue road and infrastructure repairs. But with the proposed National Park Service budget slashed by almost $400m, the Trump administration says it will turn to privatizing public park services to address those deferred maintenance costs.

“I don’t want to be in the business of running campgrounds,” Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke said at a meeting of the Recreation Vehicle Industry Association in Washington this month. This came after Donald Trump proposed cutting the Department of the Interior budget by 13%

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/jun/05/public-lands-uranium-mining-arizona-grand-canyon

A coalition of influential officials in Arizona and Utah is urging the Trump administration to consider rolling back Obama-era environmental protections that ban new uranium mining near the Grand Canyon.

They argue that the 20-year ban that came into effect in 2012 is unlawful and stifles economic opportunity in the mining industry. But supporters of the ban say new mining activity could increase the risk of uranium-contaminated water flowing into the canyon. Past mining in the region has left hundreds of polluted sites among Arizona’s Navajo population, leading to serious health consequences, including cancer and kidney failure

Trump did his part by donating his pay check to the national parks... time for the rest of America to follow suit :pimp:
 
On the real though one thing that shouldn't be overlooked in those stats is the power of academia to educate people into realizing how much more sense the liberal way makes.

My liberal thinking comes mainly from my education.
 
Last edited:
SCOTUS ruled that they will hear the travel ban case in the fall until then it is partially reinstated

It you have ties to someone or something in the US will be allowed to enter, if not they can block you.

Expect the fragile Orange Bigot to act like he got a big win.

And expect his Stans, you be in here today because they finally have trolling material

was just about to ask about this...seen scotus trending...so the catch is the ties to the u.s....?
 
SCOTUS ruled that they will hear the travel ban case in the fall until then it is partially reinstated

It you have ties to someone or something in the US will be allowed to enter, if not they can block you.

Expect the fragile Orange Bigot to act like he got a big win.

And expect his Stans, you be in here today because they finally have trolling material
trump's already declared it a win today.

A big asterisk is that:

The court said it would hear the case when it reconvenes in October. But it also indicated in the ruling that things may change dramatically by then. It asked the parties to address whether the case would be moot by the time it hears it; the ban is supposed to be a temporary one while the government reviews its vetting procedures.

And the justices said they “fully expect” the government to be able to conduct its review within the 90-day span the executive order proposes.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...afa314-573e-11e7-b38e-35fd8e0c288f_story.html

Which implies that the government will now get their 90-day stay to figure out their more permanent vetting procedures.

btw, I didn't come across what happens to people who are hired here? It gives exceptions to students and family members, but what about people who have jobs here?

edit: nvm, it's spelled out here, in the official SCOTUS statement:

The facts of these cases illustrate the sort of relationship that qualifies. For individuals, a close familial relationship is required. A foreign national who wishes to enter the United States to live with or visit a family member, like Doe’s wife or Dr. Elshikh’s mother-in-law, clearly has such a relationship. As for entities, the relationship must be formal, documented, and formed in the ordinary course, rather than for the purpose of evading EO–2. The students from the designated countries who have been admitted to the University of Hawaii have such a relationship with an American entity. So too would a worker who accepted an offer of employment from an American company or a lecturer invited to address an American audience. Not so someone who enters into a relationship simply to avoid §2(c): For example, a nonprofit group devoted to immigration issues may not contact foreign nationals from the designated countries, add them to client lists, and then secure their entry by claiming injury from their exclusion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-1436_l6hc.pdf
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom