***Official Political Discussion Thread***

Cats is deliberately playing dumb. The Democrat primary is/was rigged.

Your goddess Hillary is a shill.

And anyone who supports by proxy supports unprecedented levels of political corruption and collusion.


But let's just focus on a joke Trump made during a press conference.
 
Can we acknowledge that Dems don't really care about the NatSec issues regarding Clinton's server? She's been lying about it for so long and it was brushed off as R witchhunt for the past year. The problem is that it threatens the security of her political campaign now.

I can say that and recognize Trump said something no Presidential candidate should say.
 
Clinton is spending millions a week on ads vs $0 on Trump's side.

Obama went from laughing at a potential Trump Administration to taking it dead serious now...

and i guess even though no one here is supposed to believe em, da political pundits treat those polls like gospel...and they're shook. :lol:
A bump after the convention is a norm though

Romney must've missed da memo...
 
Cats is deliberately playing dumb. The Democrat primary is/was rigged.

Your goddess Hillary is a shill.

And anyone who supports by proxy supports unprecedented levels of political corruption and collusion.


But let's just focus on a joke Trump made during a press conference.

[emoji]128557[/emoji][emoji]128557[/emoji][emoji]128557[/emoji]
 
Cats is deliberately playing dumb. The Democrat primary is/was rigged.

Your goddess Hillary is a shill.

And anyone who supports by proxy supports unprecedented levels of political corruption and collusion.


But let's just focus on a joke Trump made during a press conference.

Hmm. What is worse, you think?

Colluding with other Democrats or Colluding with the Russians? [emoji]129300[/emoji]
 
Martin O'Malley...

I actually liked him and wouldve voted for him. Of course his blemish is his criminal justice system policies but man,

Like many have said, if O'Malley was a 40 year old hispanic male, itd be crazy how much more formidable he would have been..

He reminds me of a 1950s presidential canidate .. The way he looks, the way he speaks, ... like just a picture perfect president for America in the 1950s and 60s.

Of course his policies reflect modern day dems - further left than HRC.
 
Last edited:
You know what's hilarious from Drumpf supporters, the selective nature of what they pick and choose to believe that clown says. Anything that's remotely negative is not to be taken seriously, only as a joke or him trolling, yet his policies, nevermind the validity or probability of them actually working are to be taken as fact. Like how are you so sure when he's been real and when is he trollin?
 
You know what's hilarious from Drumpf supporters, the selective nature of what they pick and choose to believe that clown says. Anything that's remotely negative is not to be taken seriously, only as a joke or him trolling, yet his policies, nevermind the validity or probability of them actually working are to be taken as fact. Like how are you so sure when he's been real and when is he trollin?

Yup.

Anything bad.. 'He's not stupid. He says everything for a reason.'

Anything good.. ' My man! Best president ever! '
 
You know what's hilarious from Drumpf supporters, the selective nature of what they pick and choose to believe that clown says. Anything that's remotely negative is not to be taken seriously, only as a joke or him trolling, yet his policies, nevermind the validity or probability of them actually working are to be taken as fact. Like how are you so sure when he's been real and when is he trollin?

Yup.

Anything bad.. 'He's not stupid. He says everything for a reason.'

Anything good.. ' My man! Best president ever! '
The latter happens one out of ten times.
 
Like how are you so sure when he's been real and when is he trollin?

gee idk..maybe because da server been destroyed forever ago?

whats da Russians gonna hack..air? :lol:

now if they DO have those Emails its because Hillary was a idiot having a non-sanctioned server that got comprised.
 
If you say "He knows better, or he's doing it for a reason..." Then you're openly admitting that what he's saying is wrong, damaging, harmful, and dangerous. So you're putting your co-sign to it.

You also then tangentially admit that there are people who don't know better, who don't get "it." That this dangerous rhetoric will light the fire under someone.

So at the best, you're as despicable as Trump if he "knows what he's doing," and see nothing wrong with it.

At worst, you'd be the clueless and dense dullard
 
Last edited:
gee idk..maybe because da server been destroyed forever ago?

whats da Russians gonna hack..air? :lol:

now if they DO have those Emails its because Hillary was a idiot having a non-sanctioned server that got comprised.
Not a word of this is an actual answer to the question
 
Can we acknowledge that Dems don't really care about the NatSec issues regarding Clinton's server? She's been lying about it for so long and it was brushed off as R witchhunt for the past year. The problem is that it threatens the security of her political campaign now.

I can say that and recognize Trump said something no Presidential candidate should say.

No doubt Hillary was incompetent and reckless by having a home based email server to bypass security protocols. Anyone that has ever known someone with (or held) a security clearance could attest to this!

Everyone should read the statement made by the FBI director.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

Here are the 5 LIES that Clinton was caught with;

1. “allowed by the State Department,”

2. Predecessors had similar record keeping practices

3. Private server was never hacked

4. Just a “security review” and “everyone else has” cooperated

5. No classified emails were ever sent on her home server

Now should she be charged? Maybe... maybe not... hell none of us here know the details of the investigation and how it affected national security and unless the actual investigation is available online for us to analyze, we just have to take the FBI's word.

What's crazy is now that Clinton and Trump have been appointed as their party's nominee, they will start getting those security briefings from the NSA.

My worry is will Trump talk about classified intelligence? Most likely YES cause he can't stop talking.

And also can Clinton be entrusted with these intelligence briefings?

I can only hope Obama goes off tonight and reassure the Nation that this country will be safe under Hillary's watch!
 
The next time Ninja answers a direct question will be the first time. 
 
If you say "He knows better, or he's doing it for a reason..." Then you're openly admitting that what he's saying is wrong, damaging, harmful, and dangerous. So you're putting your co-sign to it.

You also then tangentially admit that there are people who don't know better, who don't get "it." That this dangerous rhetoric will light the fire under someone.

So at the best, you're as despicable as Trump if he "knows what he's doing," and see nothing wrong with it.

At worst, you'd be the clueless and dense dullard

guess ur missing da entire point of political strategy...none of ya or da press talking bout da Clinton speech...its all Trump off a joke. :lol:
 
gee idk..maybe because da server been destroyed forever ago?

whats da Russians gonna hack..air? :lol:

now if they DO have those Emails its because Hillary was a idiot having a non-sanctioned server that got comprised.
Not a word of this is an actual answer to the question

yo Belgium boy, maybe you need to Understand da complexities that is da English language to understand context, satire, sarcasm and an already premise.

i mean lemme guess, ya only get sarcasm when Oliver & Bill Maher spoon feeding it? :lol:
 
Clowning Colombia for his nationality wouldn't fly in any other situation

I don't understand why these lames get a pass for it
 
Back
Top Bottom