- 15,762
- 516
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
If you are concerned about your neck, you should either get an attorney or just go to the doctor and have the insurance pay the bills.
- 93,960
- 32,986
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
- 997
- 56
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
If it wasn't your fault you have nothing to worry about
- 67,759
- 102,756
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
This all sounds like a simple solution. I don't get the thread.
stunnafasho03
Banned
- 1,132
- 126
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2003
Qft
powerballin
Banned
- 3,756
- 2,706
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2012
Im wondering the samething. Just ask your dad man
- 5,983
- 533
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2004
anyone know how much they will payinjury wise for an airbag burn and soft tissue neck injury
- 1,716
- 175
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2005
just call the General you'll be fine
- 568
- 182
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2012
take out another lease and get the same car.
- 828
- 27
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
call saul
- 15,762
- 516
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2005
OP wants money for his injuriesnot for them just to cover the bills...
Wish it was that easy, unless you have a serious injury, most claims cover enough for bills and expenses, and maybe a little something after. Taking it anything further than that would probably be costly and time consuming.
I would be mainly concerned about getting that car fixed up as well as my health.
Last edited:
- 93,960
- 32,986
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2010
OP wants money for his injuries
Wish it was that easy, unless you have a serious injury, most claims cover enough for bills and expenses, and maybe a little something after. Taking it anything further than that would probably be costly and time consuming.
I would be mainly concerned about getting that car fixed up as well as my health.
nah, it can be done rather easily. sure it takes time but my friend wasnt even injured, said he had a neck injury and was out of work. He actually didnt have a job
was getting money every month in the end he finally got about $30k settlement.
- 3,094
- 468
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- 8,139
- 88
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
Leasing tho
JVII
Supporter
- 1,680
- 714
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
^Makes sense on high priced luxury autos (provided you don't opt to buy it at the end of the lease).
- 13,529
- 9,454
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2008
Thats crazy, I was just behind a 200h last night complaining about how I could hardly see its taillights.
That car has TERRIBLE taillight and brake light visibility. Only a small portion of that huge light fixture actually illuminates
That car has TERRIBLE taillight and brake light visibility. Only a small portion of that huge light fixture actually illuminates
Last edited:
- 70,049
- 24,221
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
**** is basically a toyota prius dressed up in a cute outfit.Thats crazy, I was just behind a 200h last night complaining about how I could hardly see its taillights.
That car has TERRIBLE taillight and brake light visibility. Only a small portion of that huge light fixture actually illuminates
- 13,529
- 9,454
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2008
Thats crazy, I was just behind a 200h last night complaining about how I could hardly see its taillights.
That car has TERRIBLE taillight and brake light visibility. Only a small portion of that huge light fixture actually illuminates
**** is basically a toyota prius dressed up in a cute outfit.
:x at da acceleration.
Even the "F" version is just a bodykit. The drivetrain is still the EXACT same. Hybrid tech is fine for the base/lux models, but I think the "F' should have had at least a turbo 4 for some kick.
IMO lexus really shouldnt have used the "F" moniker on the CT without a beefier performance oriented drivetrain. They should have called it "sport appearance pak" or something like that. I feel like if lexus is trying to build a reputation for their "F line" akin to BMWs "M line" they cant afford to associate it with an underwheming commuter car like the Prius/ct200h.
Last edited: