Quote:
Originally Posted by
SoleByThePound 

@ kindly asked, you're a funny dude.
If you know you're history, which I don't think you really do; you would know the first wave of retros in 1994 were a huge flop. Nike ceased production on the IV's because of how flat sales were. It also helped that Mike decided to go back to the Bulls so Nike was able to ditch it with a valid excuse. When Jordan Brand was given it's own separate line they released team editions to balance the brand, it wasn't known if there was a marketplace for retros, but the blk IV was a hit and the rest is history.
Six years ago I worked in the industry and would go to Nike's offices here in Los Angeles. Our rep at the time tried to feed us the same bs about Gentry and why Nike Air was no longer on the shoe. The truth is Mike now had the power to alter the shoe how ever he wanted. Gentry was not the individual who determined a jumpman being put on anything, if you believe that you're delusional.
i meant that as a sarcastic statement, the kindly asking.
So you're telling me that what Gentry said in the interviews about Nike Air not appearing on retros in order to preserve the OGs, and collectors was a flat out lie or a cover up for MJ's real initiatives? Show me some concrete, factual evidence that this was really Michael Jordan's original ambition for retros sporting a jumpman instead of Nike Air.
And yes, at that time, the 94 retros were a flop because Nike was still churning out original sneakers that were still doing well to the consumer's eye... i.e. Barkleys, Pippens, OG Jordans, Pennys/Foams, AM 95s etc. Plus at the time, consumers didn't want a sneaker that resembled of the past. It was all about today and what the newest, latest sneaker looked like every year.
The 99 retros were a hit because Nike and JB were in the twilight of making original looking sneakers.