NikeTalk › NikeTalk Forums › The Kicks › Jordan Brand › Official Air Jordan 3 "White Cement" '88 Retro - Retail $200
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Official Air Jordan 3 "White Cement" '88 Retro - Retail $200 - Page 17

post #481 of 16803
I don't see how anyone could be mad at this. If you don't like em, don't buy em. If you're really salty that someone else has the opportunity to get something that you have, you are in this for the wrong reason. This are one of my grails and I got the 2011 retro. I'm not concerned all that much about the Nike Air. I will only cop these if they are made of better materials. I've been saying for a while now that JB should do 1 or 2 retros each year with OG materials and charge more for them. At this point I'd rather go for quality over quantity.
post #482 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by green rhino123 View Post

not all '94 white-cement 3 retros are unwearable, trust me
some wish it to be the case to get their slight in but it's not

I saw an old dude at the bar last year with a beat up pair with Nike Air on the back.
post #483 of 16803
I heard about this last Christmas from a friend that works at Jordan. Good to see it finally happening. The other thing he told me was that they would be VERY limited and pushing these into the $250 range. Guess we'll see if that's true, but so far he's never given me any reason to doubt him.

Peace,
J
post #484 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuddhaShark View Post

I saw an old dude at the bar last year with a beat up pair with Nike Air on the back.

and not all the wearable pairs are beat-up either
post #485 of 16803
^ This is for the OCD'ers, any differences to the shoe you see that are noticeable from the '11 model?

Shape? Cement print? Ankle height?

nerd.gif
#TeamRetail

Team Buffalo Bills fan #3 of 4

TWITTER | FACEBOOK | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM
Reply
#TeamRetail

Team Buffalo Bills fan #3 of 4

TWITTER | FACEBOOK | YOUTUBE | INSTAGRAM
Reply
post #486 of 16803
Sucks that they still have Jordan on the outsole.
post #487 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by blco02 View Post

Sucks that they still have Jordan on the outsole.

I swear JB does it on Purpose, just like the 1's when they have air and the jumpman, no matter what it has Nike Air on the bottom of the shoe.

This one get the Nike air and now Jordan is still stuck on the bottom.
post #488 of 16803
I am not a reseller but if I am wearing these and someone saw em on feet or something and offered a ridiculous amount of money he can have em. Yah I like the Nike Air but not enough to keep em if someone will pay a premium. I will be fine with a 2011 pair. But since I missed out on that release I will try my luck with these
Size Swap: Royal Jordan 1s. Your size 11 for my size 11.5. Must be DS must be a Chicago meet up.

Tackling the Four Horsemen: FAR [ ] BEC [ ] REG [ ] AUD [ ]
Reply
Size Swap: Royal Jordan 1s. Your size 11 for my size 11.5. Must be DS must be a Chicago meet up.

Tackling the Four Horsemen: FAR [ ] BEC [ ] REG [ ] AUD [ ]
Reply
post #489 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by jshortt View Post

I heard about this last Christmas from a friend that works at Jordan. Good to see it finally happening. The other thing he told me was that they would be VERY limited and pushing these into the $250 range. Guess we'll see if that's true, but so far he's never given me any reason to doubt him.

Peace,
J

 

mean.gif

 

I mean, I understand WHY they'd do this from a business standpoint.  But damn....as a consumer that hurts.  laugh.gif  I have no doubts this is what JB will do.  

 

When a shoe that I originally copped for $100 retails for $250, it may be time to just walk away with my happy childhood memories still intact.  

post #490 of 16803
i dont think these will be $250.

i think though they will be $200 on the dot.
post #491 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by superblyTRIFE View Post

mean.gif

I mean, I understand WHY they'd do this from a business standpoint.  But damn....as a consumer that hurts.  laugh.gif   I have no doubts this is what JB will do.  

When a shoe that I originally copped for $100 retails for $250, it may be time to just walk away with my happy childhood memories still intact.  

How much was a gallon of milk in 1988?
post #492 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuddhaShark View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by superblyTRIFE View Post

mean.gif

I mean, I understand WHY they'd do this from a business standpoint.  But damn....as a consumer that hurts.  laugh.gif   I have no doubts this is what JB will do.  

When a shoe that I originally copped for $100 retails for $250, it may be time to just walk away with my happy childhood memories still intact.  

How much was a gallon of milk in 1988?

$2.30

Gas was a buck a gallon.
**FS/FT Nike SB Levis Blk/Red Size 10** Inbox For More Info**
Reply
**FS/FT Nike SB Levis Blk/Red Size 10** Inbox For More Info**
Reply
post #493 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoleByThePound View Post

laugh.gif @ kindly asked, you're a funny dude.

If you know you're history, which I don't think you really do; you would know the first wave of retros in 1994 were a huge flop. Nike ceased production on the IV's because of how flat sales were. It also helped that Mike decided to go back to the Bulls so Nike was able to ditch it with a valid excuse. When Jordan Brand was given it's own separate line they released team editions to balance the brand, it wasn't known if there was a marketplace for retros, but the blk IV was a hit and the rest is history.

Six years ago I worked in the industry and would go to Nike's offices here in Los Angeles. Our rep at the time tried to feed us the same bs about Gentry and why Nike Air was no longer on the shoe. The truth is Mike now had the power to alter the shoe how ever he wanted. Gentry was not the individual who determined a jumpman being put on anything, if you believe that you're delusional.

i meant that as a sarcastic statement, the kindly asking.

So you're telling me that what Gentry said in the interviews about Nike Air not appearing on retros in order to preserve the OGs, and collectors was a flat out lie or a cover up for MJ's real initiatives? Show me some concrete, factual evidence that this was really Michael Jordan's original ambition for retros sporting a jumpman instead of Nike Air.

And yes, at that time, the 94 retros were a flop because Nike was still churning out original sneakers that were still doing well to the consumer's eye... i.e. Barkleys, Pippens, OG Jordans, Pennys/Foams, AM 95s etc. Plus at the time, consumers didn't want a sneaker that resembled of the past. It was all about today and what the newest, latest sneaker looked like every year.

The 99 retros were a hit because Nike and JB were in the twilight of making original looking sneakers.
R.I.P. Hadiya Pendleton

twitter: @unclemikev

instagram: @unc_mike_v

Cubs, Bulls, Bears
Reply
R.I.P. Hadiya Pendleton

twitter: @unclemikev

instagram: @unc_mike_v

Cubs, Bulls, Bears
Reply
post #494 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by superblyTRIFE View Post

mean.gif

I mean, I understand WHY they'd do this from a business standpoint.  But damn....as a consumer that hurts.  laugh.gif   I have no doubts this is what JB will do.  

When a shoe that I originally copped for $100 retails for $250, it may be time to just walk away with my happy childhood memories still intact.  

I agree. I just got back into the game. Was out for 8 or 9 years. Came back to the Bred IV's and I have NEVER seen so many retro release then I have since black Friday. It's INSANE what they are dropping and how much their going for. I remember when I worked for FNL and the Cool Grey 9's sat around for months before we sold out.

I hate to say it but I feel the shoe game is going down hill. I may be right with you and my childhood memories.
post #495 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickickz23 View Post

So you're telling me that what Gentry said in the interviews about Nike Air not appearing on retros in order to preserve the OGs, and collectors was a flat out lie or a cover up for MJ's real initiatives? Show me some concrete, factual evidence that this was really Michael Jordan's original ambition for retros sporting a jumpman instead of Nike Air.
 

You need concrete evidence that Jordan is an egotistical control freak? laugh.gif @ asking for proof of a individuals ambitions. I don't know what you want, a signed letter from Michael himself stating he has never cared about preserving the OG's. How naive are you to actually believe that bs? Seriously man, you couldn't read between the lines even back then? Gentry nor Michael cared about anything more than making money and they knew they could slap a logo of a dildo on the shoe if they wanted and consumers would still eat it up. The fact that you're arguing with me on this topic is funny to me. There is no need to take this any further; it's obvious you & I have very different points of view on this topic. Agree to disagree.

Fancy cars, diamond rings, nice restaurants and those finer things lost our souls our hopes and dreams in the City of Angels.

Reply

Fancy cars, diamond rings, nice restaurants and those finer things lost our souls our hopes and dreams in the City of Angels.

Reply
post #496 of 16803
It's funny how JB be playing the role of the female sometimes and straight messin with all these guys minds and emotions

Looking to buy DS Air Jordan 3 True Blue's size 11 only - PM me

Reply

Looking to buy DS Air Jordan 3 True Blue's size 11 only - PM me

Reply
post #497 of 16803
Real talk though just give me these the bc 3 s with NA done right and the black infrared and carmine 6s done right and ill be 95 % out the game

Looking to buy DS Air Jordan 3 True Blue's size 11 only - PM me

Reply

Looking to buy DS Air Jordan 3 True Blue's size 11 only - PM me

Reply
post #498 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by btptt555 View Post

Real talk though just give me these the bc 3 s with NA done right and the black infrared and carmine 6s done right and ill be 95 % out the game

I like how you leave that 5% window open, JB has everyone by the balls. laugh.gif

Fancy cars, diamond rings, nice restaurants and those finer things lost our souls our hopes and dreams in the City of Angels.

Reply

Fancy cars, diamond rings, nice restaurants and those finer things lost our souls our hopes and dreams in the City of Angels.

Reply
post #499 of 16803
Will try to cop.. if not, so be it
post #500 of 16803
This will be my first pair of III's if true smokin.gif
Have you heard about the cell phone company that pays its users back?. I use Solavei. PM me for more info to an awesome opportunity. _____ Twitter: @Lacville_79
Reply
Have you heard about the cell phone company that pays its users back?. I use Solavei. PM me for more info to an awesome opportunity. _____ Twitter: @Lacville_79
Reply
post #501 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoleByThePound View Post

I like how you leave that 5% window open, JB has everyone by the balls. laugh.gif

Ha ya, I'll admit it, I will prob never "retire" from this passion/hobby of mine.  Buttttttt, if as I see it, Jordan Brand continues to listen to it's consumers more and and give them what they want then ya, I can see myself cutting back significantly.  I already have all the shoes I need, and can afford to be selective and buy only ones that really catch my interest, haven't been released in a while, in original colorways, etc.  Like I said, give me some quality carmines/black infrareds and hell some Colombias that won't yellow and I'm straight for a bit.  As of next year, so far, I'm only buying Royal 1's, black/red thirteens, black/white "he got games whatever the fk you want to call them" 13's and maybe the grape 5's for now.

Looking to buy DS Air Jordan 3 True Blue's size 11 only - PM me

Reply

Looking to buy DS Air Jordan 3 True Blue's size 11 only - PM me

Reply
post #502 of 16803
If anybody pays $250 retail for these, they are a sucker. $100 extra for a Nike Air sign mean.gif
post #503 of 16803

This puts anything that I was thinking of buying far on the back burner. I want three pairs of these and nothing else this year. Holy Grail with Nike Air finally back on it is perfect. No other J sounds at all exciting after hearing this news.

post #504 of 16803
Originally Posted by b4real23 View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by superblyTRIFE View Post

mean.gif

I mean, I understand WHY they'd do this from a business standpoint.  But damn....as a consumer that hurts.  laugh.gif   I have no doubts this is what JB will do.  

When a shoe that I originally copped for $100 retails for $250, it may be time to just walk away with my happy childhood memories still intact.  

I agree. I just got back into the game. Was out for 8 or 9 years. Came back to the Bred IV's and I have NEVER seen so many retro release then I have since black Friday. It's INSANE what they are dropping and how much their going for. I remember when I worked for FNL and the Cool Grey 9's sat around for months before we sold out.

I hate to say it but I feel the shoe game is going down hill. I may be right with you and my childhood memories.

 

Don't get me wrong here--I'll never stop buying sneakers.  But like you, I've been sitting on the Jordan Brand sidelines for years until the Concords last year.  I also copped the IV's last month, but my most recent Jordan purchase prior to those was the Black/Metallic V's back in Jan. of '07.  Seeing the decreasing quality and the increasing prices, I just couldn't justify spending my $$ on shoes made of paper-thin "leather".  But obviously some kicks have that sentimental value, which is why the XIs and IVs were copped.

 

So when I say walk away, I just mean from Jordans.  I'll always fiend for a pair of Nikes lol.  But with J's, I've been pretty much turned off by them over the past 6 years, so completely walking away wouldn't be hard for me.  I love the idea of releasing retros with the Nike Air.  But I'll be damned if I pay $200+ retail for them.  That's a slap in the face IF these IIIs are the exact same as the most recent retro in terms of quality.  Can we really justify that big of a markup for seven letters on the back of the shoe?  Some may, but I can't.

 

Now, if JB brings it with the quality.....that's a different story. laugh.gif

post #505 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zyzz View Post

i dont think these will be $250.
i think though they will be $200 on the dot.

$200 is still pretty steep, but to be honest, only thing that will stop me from picking up a pair will be how the release is handled. Online only and a high price tag has me believing these will be pretty hard to get.
post #506 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by just nikes View Post

If anybody pays $250 retail for these, they are a sucker. $100 extra for a Nike Air sign mean.gif
i'd do it. foamposites are 225 though. i'd take these over any foams any time. just my opinion. smokin.gif.
post #507 of 16803
250!!! Imma have to sit this one out
post #508 of 16803

I cant wait I hope these really do release!  Thanks JB!smile.gif

post #509 of 16803
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEND ONE View Post

Cats will never be satisfied.

First it's, "we need NA on the back". Now that its happening, dudes are crying over value going down.

Tough crowd.

 

 

THIS.

post #510 of 16803
Nike air 3s? I def need a pair, or two. I don't care if the quality is gonna be POS
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Jordan Brand
NikeTalk › NikeTalk Forums › The Kicks › Jordan Brand › Official Air Jordan 3 "White Cement" '88 Retro - Retail $200