LEAKED: U.S. planned to initiate chemical attack on Syria, then blame it on Assad.

My mind is effin blown right now...how in the hell did OP stumble upon this back then...
 
Im not even amazed.

Known for awhile the US government is about as dirty as it gets.
 
ninjahood said:
wow, OP was a wizard with this post.
Click to expand...


Looks like Britam was the wizard....








http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-bac...yria-and-blame-it-on-assad-government/5346907



“US Backed Plan to Launch Chemical Weapon Attack on Syria and Blame it on Assad Government”




‘Chemical Weapons’ media propaganda in US, UK is designed to hide the truth in Syria.

Revised and Updated

The Mail quickly pulled the story down within 24 hours, offering no formal retraction, but simply wiped it clean from their website, but we have a screen shot (below).

1-Britam-Leaks-Daily-Mail

The Mail was later sued by Britam Defense, and forced to publish a retraction. The Guardian reported on June 26th:

“The Daily Mail has apologised and paid £110,000 in libel damages to a London defence firm it wrongly linked with an alleged chemical weapons plot in Syria.

Britam Defence Limited complained that an article on the Daily Mail’s website Mail Online falsely accused two of its executives of conspiring in a “nefarious and illegal plot” in the Middle Eastern state “for enormous financial reward”.

The article quoted one email supposedly sent between two executives at the company which claimed to show that Britam had agreed to supply chemical weapons to Homs for use in an attack. However, the emails turned out to be forged.”

One of the original leaks which led to this brief, but buried story, was contained in the Britam Leaks, which detailed the alleged plan to be carried out which was said to have received a green light from Washington and was to be financed by Qatar.

Although a libel settlement was reached regarding naming the two Britam executives mentioned in the Mail article, it’s hard to prove that the plot itself did not happen – and herein lies the problem with the secretive shadow state and its array of private contractors in both the US and UK.
Click to expand...


View media item 578825






http://www.cyberwarnews.info/reports/a-look-into-the-britam-defence-data-leak-files/
 
Last edited:
Holy ****. This thread was started in JANURARY?!?!?!

Niketalk, we have to do something with this information.

COMPLEX MAGAZINE EDITORS WHO VISIT THIS SITE IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AS JOURNALISTS TO NOT THE DATE OF THAT DAILY MAIL ARTICLE AND DO YOUR DUE RESEARCH INTO THESE JANURARY REVELATIONS.
 
Last edited:
knowledgebones72 said:
Holy ****. This thread was started in JANURARY?!?!?!

Niketalk, we have to do something with this information.

COMPLEX MAGAZINE EDITORS WHO VISIT THIS SITE IT IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY AS JOURNALISTS TO NOT THE DATE OF THAT DAILY MAIL ARTICLE AND DO YOUR DUE RESEARCH INTO THESE JANURARY REVELATIONS.
Click to expand...

There are people saying it is fake and that the email headers don't match and that the dates were copy and pasted. I don't have the original files so I cannot verify. I thought people said that things lined up when it first came out. Idk...
 
Meh. Syria has been known for using chemical weapons before this post. In fact, Obama addressed it in Aug 2012.


Aug. 20, 2012: President Obama during a speech on the threat of weapons of mass-destruction warns against chemical weapons’ use in Syria, for the first time setting the U.S.’ red-line against such a move. “That would change my calculus,” he said. “That would change my equation.” The warning serves as the first U.S. threat of intervention in the conflict through military means, at a time when it is becoming more obvious that the civil war would be lengthy.


Dec. 3, 2012: Obama repeats his warning to Assad in a speech at the National Defense University, saying “The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable. And if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable.”
Click to expand...



http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/08/28/2539341/syria-chemical-weapons-saga/


You can leave your tinfoil hats off for now.
 
Last edited:
I think they wanted this information to be found. It can't be that easy, for what motive; that I don't know.
 
The following is a Reuters timeline of debate over and alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria by either Assad's or rebel forces.

Timeline: Turning points in the U.S. debate on Syria


inShare
Share this

Email
Print
Related Topics
U.S. »
World »
Politics »
United Nations »
Syria »
WASHINGTON | Sat Aug 31, 2013 3:42pm EDT
(Reuters) - President Barack Obama backed off from an imminent military strike against Syria on Saturday to seek the approval of the U.S. Congress, in a decision that likely delays U.S. action for at least 10 days.

Following are turning points in the Obama administration's debate on whether and how to intervene in Syria's two-year civil war.

April 29, 2011 - United States slaps sanctions on Syria's intelligence agency and two relatives of President Bashar al-Assad, in Washington's first concrete steps in response to a crackdown on anti-government protests inspired by the "Arab Spring."

August 18, 2011 - For the first time, Obama calls for Assad to step down, saying: "For the sake of the Syrian people, the time has come for President Assad to step aside." Britain, France and Germany also call for Assad to go.

July 19, 2012 - U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice calls the Russian and Chinese vetoes of a U.N. Security Council resolution on Syria "dangerous and deplorable."

July 23, 2012 - Syria says it could use chemical weapons in response to any "external aggression" but they will not be used in Assad's campaign to crush the uprising in what appeared to be the first time that Syria acknowledges it might possess non-conventional weapons.

July 23, 2012 - Obama says Assad will be held accountable if he makes the "tragic mistake" of using Syria's stockpile of chemical weapons.

August 20, 2012 - Obama warns Assad that the use or deployment of chemical or biological weapons in his country's conflict would be a "red line" for the United States. "A red line for us is (if) we see a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around, or being utilized. That would change my calculus," he tells reporters.

December 3, 2012 - Obama warns Assad "the world is watching" and there would be consequences if he uses chemical weapons against Syrian opposition forces. "The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable and if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable," he says in a speech to a gathering of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons proliferation experts.

March 19, 2013 - Syria's government and rebels accuse each other of launching a deadly chemical attack near the northern city of Aleppo in what would be the first use of such weapons in the two-year conflict.

April 26, 2013 - Obama warns Assad that any use of chemical weapons in Syria's civil war would be a "game changer" but remains cautious about endorsing intelligence assessments that such weapons had been deployed.

June 8, 2013 - Syrian government troops backed by guerrillas from Lebanon's Hezbollah seize the western village of Buwayda to end rebel resistance around the strategically important town of Qusair in a success for Assad forces. The involvement of Iran-sponsored Hezbollah and gains by Syrian forces prompt renewed U.S. debate on arming Assad's opponents.

June 13, 2013 - After two months of caution about reports Syria used chemical weapons, the White House says U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded that Assad's forces indeed used such weapons, including the nerve agent sarin, on a small scale against the opposition multiple times, killing 100 to 150 people. The White House vows to increase military aid to the Syrian rebels.

August 21, 2013 - Syria's opposition accuses government forces of gassing hundreds of people by firing rockets that released deadly fumes over rebel-held neighborhoods near Damascus, killing men, women and children as they slept. If confirmed, it would be the worst chemical weapons attack in 25 years.

August 26, 2013 - Secretary of State John Kerry says all nations must stand up for accountability on the "undeniable" use of chemical weapons in Syria, where he said the government maintained custody of such weapons. "Let me be clear: The indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, the killing of women and children and innocent bystanders by chemical weapons is a moral obscenity."

August 30, 2013 - In separate statements, Obama and Kerry harshly condemn the Syrian government, saying the Aug 21. attack cannot go unpunished. Obama says: "We cannot accept a world where women and children and innocent civilians are gassed on a terrible scale," while Kerry calls Assad "a thug and a murderer." But they say any military response by the United States would be measured to avoid open-ended commitments.

August 30, 2013 - U.S. intelligence agencies publicly disclose some of the information that led to a "high-confidence" assessment that the government of Assad carried out a chemical weapons attack on neighborhoods outside Damascus, causing the deaths of an estimated 1,429 Syrians on August 21.

August 31, 2013 - Obama says he had authorized the use of military force to punish Syria, with military assets to carry out a strike in place and ready to move on his order, but he would first seek authorization from Congress. "Today I'm asking Congress to send a message to the world that we are ready to move as one nation," he said.

Note the gap.
 
I do remember Obama giving that speech in Dec 2012 saying that unless Syria began to use chemical weapons he's not going to intervene. So it's possible that the original article from January ran with that.
 
buggz05 said:
There are people saying it is fake and that the email headers don't match and that the dates were copy and pasted. I don't have the original files so I cannot verify. I thought people said that things lined up when it first came out. Idk...
Click to expand...

That maybe so but this grave dig ain't fake!
 
Based Mod said:
Meh. Syria has been known for using chemical weapons before this post. In fact, Obama addressed it in Aug 2012.
Aug. 20, 2012: President Obama during a speech on the threat of weapons of mass-destruction warns against chemical weapons’ use in Syria, for the first time setting the U.S.’ red-line against such a move. “That would change my calculus,” he said. “That would change my equation.” The warning serves as the first U.S. threat of intervention in the conflict through military means, at a time when it is becoming more obvious that the civil war would be lengthy.
Click to expand...
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2013/08/28/2539341/syria-chemical-weapons-saga/

You can leave your tinfoil hats off for now.
Click to expand...
...Which is why the US was gonna use chemical weapons and frame them.  You don't frame people of things that aren't in their nature.  And so what if he addressed it in August 2012, you don't think they can plan things more than a year in advance? 
laugh.gif
 
Last edited:
wikileaks and the things snowden "exposed" were  all known, if you were paying attention to anything in 2001.

it's funny as hell to see people try to act informed when they watched videos on youtube about "FEMA CAMPS" 
roll.gif


you think the stuff the government keeps secret is that easy to obtain that someone with a computer can get it? 

"leaks" are purposely let loose, the good stuff we will never hear about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

frenchbreadbuilds
atmos Will To Close Its US Stores And Website To Focus On Japan/Asia Business
Replies
16
Views
2K
Beruseruku Desu
Beruseruku Desu

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom