The Old PlayStation Thread | *NEW THREAD IS UP*

Gta 5 is a work of art
You dammnnnnnn right!!!!! 
pimp.gif
 
I know I shouldn't buy The Order since I'm nowhere close to being finished with Dying Light (9% :smh: ) but damn it has to be copped... in the middle of Spring Semester too :x
 
Someone was streaming The Order on Twitch last night. It looked dope.

A little nervous that it is just single player ain't gonna lie.
 
Im praying the order makes it to redbox. I have a feeling it won't take long to beat, and I'm not one for replaying games I've already beat.

Just copped Rayman legends on ps4, definitely worth the ten beans on ps store. Not sure why I never played a Rahman before now, it's piff.
 
Last edited:
Someone was streaming The Order on Twitch last night. It looked dope.

A little nervous that it is just single player ain't gonna lie.

What's there to be nervous off?


Im praying the order makes it to redbox. I have a feeling it won't take long to beat, and I'm not one for replaying games I've already beat.

Just copped Rayman legends on ps4, definitely worth the ten beans on ps store. Not sure why I never played a Rahman before now, it's piff.

10 hours is what I've seen thrown around unless you speed run the game.
 
What's there to be nervous off?
10 hours is what I've seen thrown around unless you speed run the game.
10 hours I can live with, on par with TLOU. I usually don't play games for more than 45 minutes to a hour before something comes up so its a day one for sure now.
 
It's not so much the fact that 1886 doesn't have multiplayer in itself. It's more the fact that the style of gameplay is so obviously suitable for multiplayer yet it doesn't have it.

Why on earth wouldn't they include it in the type of game that it is? Almost as bad as if the new Call of Duty wouldn't have multiplayer. I mean, come on, last year we had a game in Titanfall that was exclusively multiplayer.
 
Multiplayer really that big of a deal for people?? I rather play a solo game and if it has multiplayer I jump on that after the main story.
 
That setup was dope. Are all of your systems hooked up to it?

I finally started gaming on a 1ms 1080p monitor and it is :wow:. It makes a huge difference.
 
It's not so much the fact that 1886 doesn't have multiplayer in itself. It's more the fact that the style of gameplay is so obviously suitable for multiplayer yet it doesn't have it.

Why on earth wouldn't they include it in the type of game that it is? Almost as bad as if the new Call of Duty wouldn't have multiplayer. I mean, come on, last year we had a game in Titanfall that was exclusively multiplayer.

Probably not enough resources. They had to build an engine for the game.

If the game is successful, with the engine work done and with help from Sony they can include multiplayer in the sequel.

Just like Uncharted to Uncharted 2

I think there priorities are straight. Single player first then multiplayer. If you think you would do a bad job trying to spread your resources thin to do both then can the multiplayer.
 
Last edited:
OK, so best buy offered me 27.5 and 9.9 for advanced warfare and need4speed, respectively (w best buy gamers unlocked)

This after paying only $40 for each of those games during their respective launch weeks

Evolve then rang up to 41 after a best buy rewards gift card that was on my account (unbeknownst to me) and the gamers unlocked price. So whats 41 minus 27.5 minus 9.9? 3.60. Yeah i paid 3.6 for evolve

Idont see 99gamers or lamestop beating that

Moral of the story? U have until next sat. to get gamers unlocked for $30 instead of $100.....

psn is tombradysthegoat for anyone on evolve
 
Back
Top Bottom