Threads you wish would fall into the depths of NT and fade into oblivion...

[tr1ll]

Bruh, you started this once before, we defended it, meth locked it for a few weeks just to try it out, nothing changed...at all.


Period.


Thats it. We tried your way, it didn't work out.


Shut up and sit down. Please.

Weren't TAN members actively not posting in general for that week in some kind protest?

I dont recall anything like that...

I know I was still posting..

 

[beh235]

Bruh, you started this once before, we defended it, meth locked it for a few weeks just to try it out, nothing changed...at all.


Period.


Thats it. We tried your way, it didn't work out.


Shut up and sit down. Please.

Weren't TAN members actively not posting in general for that week in some kind protest?

No such thing happened. It was actually the opposite effect.

 

[nationaltruckerdave]

da tan needs tu b locked b lyke da knees of da catcher need to b locked wen he catching more den balls b.

amirite?

Sometimes you are funny, but most of the time you just try way too hard.

i agree

 

[antidope]

Bruh, you started this once before, we defended it, meth locked it for a few weeks just to try it out, nothing changed...at all.

Period.

Thats it. We tried your way, it didn't work out.

Shut up and sit down. Please.

Weren't TAN members actively not posting in general for that week in some kind protest?

This didnt happen, people may have said it, but no one did it.

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

You've posted on here since 07, damn you're dedicated.

#1
Posting on NT for a certain amount of time can be seen as dedication but it pales in comparison to the level of dedication in having over 2000 posts in one thread and then arguing against one person every time he voices his displeasure to that one thread. Not to mention the amount of complaining yall did when Meth first locked it and contemplated banning it from the forum. It seems to be that serious to yall.

ninjahood has already been given reasonable arguements and proof by nters/tanners/meth, but he dismisses them by crossing them out with lines and posts something like "see b his sig has tan in it. da cookie don't crumble dat whey b." Then pretends like he just dropped some knowledge.ninjahood uses the same tired arguments because he has no argument that isn't based on fallcious reasoning.

I've never seen ninjahood post a logical argument about why tan should be looked.

All he's done so far is to say that he doesn't like tan, therefore it should be locked.

Not happening b.

#2
I know this and yet even after witnessing ninjahood ignoring all of that, the same dudes continue to argue with him for pages on end about the same thing. It gets to the point where you're part of the problem. It's like this is really becoming a thing on par with religious, race, and sex arguments on this site. I just don't see the topic of whether tan should exist or not being worth it. Like what are yall so insecure about? ninjahood single handedly rustling all yall jimmies? When you know nothing he says can get the thread banned? Yall scared he gonna influence other new members or ppl not familiar with the thread?


Not that important b.

#1
Now, you're just being subjective

Nah there's clear differences between posting on a forum for a long time and posting in one thread thousands of times and then getting defensive when anyone says anything negative about said thread. You're in another thread now along with the same group of other ppl not even being on topic anymore but specifically going against the grain against one person about whether your precious thread should exist or not while at the same time claiming you've already won.

I could argue that having over 2,000 posts in one thread pales in comparison to keeping up with threads for a long time(3-5 years).

You could but it wouldn't be the same. I'm not surprised you don't see that though.

But, that's a waste of time.

Irony, most of the posts in this thread addressing ninjahood, arguing against him, mocking and insulting him, trolling him, etc. have been a waste of your time. It's like yall don't even see that stuff doesn't even phase ninjahood anymore.

You're being subjective again. I could argue that the amount of complaining that was done by ninjahood was more than the tanner's complaining. Arguing over what's worse than this or that is a wast of time. I was illustrating how your own reasoning could be used against you.

One person complaining a lot isn't the same as multiple ppl complaining a lot AND replying to ninjahood with the same tired arguments.

I'm not arguing with ninjahood. Various people have, but I'm not one of em. I've discussed this same topic with ninjahood a while ago, but I was foolish to think that ninjahood actually reads posts other than the ones that already agree with what he's saying.

#2
I'm not arguing with ninjahood so this paragraph shouldn't be directed at me.

Yet you've typed multiple paragraphs condoning and advocating why ppl should argue with ninjahood about this. Rehashing and regurgitating the same old talking points for who I don't know. You're not in here arguing with him then you're trolling him and addressing him indirectly with the clear intention to insult and inflame this same old tired argument. I aint surprised at this though, this is the same type of digging in arguing your stance nonsense you did in the ****** thread except this time around it's for an even more pointless cause and effort.

My jimmies remain unrustled.

If you say so but then like I said it's an odd compelling dedication you guys have to be in here again going through the same **** about TAN

Do you really expect nters to let the ridiculous notions that are typed from ninjahood's sidekick keyboard to go unchallenged?

Unchallenged? What notions? About TAN?Why is it so important? Why are yall so insecure about it? I thought yall already said the thread aint going nowhere after what Meth did? You mean to tell me every time ninjahood says something that you think is ridiculous no matter the topic or level of worth in regards to the topic I should expect multiple NTers to reply to him in this manner every time? Like seriously this aint a race thread, homosexual, political, or even standard of living of thread. Yall dudes in here arguing about the thread about nothing. Do you not see the futility?

It's not that serious.

Meth didn't contemplated banning it. He said that he would have locked it if people kept using it as a way to circumvent the rules.

Yes he did but it seems you want to argue semantics now. Had ppl kept abusing the thread by circumventing the rules he would have locked the thread and no other volumes or versions of the thread would've been permitted. Hence, banishment but if you want to pretend you remember word for word everything Meth has said about this topic go ahead with your versions of events. It really doesn't change my main point if you want to twist one thing cuz you don't remember and understand it right.

 

[supremeclntl]

Nah there's clear differences between posting on a forum for a long time and posting in one thread thousands of times and then getting defensive when anyone says anything negative about said thread. You're in another thread now along with the same group of other ppl not even being on topic anymore but specifically going against the grain against one person about whether your precious thread should exist or not while at the same time claiming you've already won.
You could but it wouldn't be the same. I'm not surprised you don't see that though.
Irony, most of the posts in this thread addressing ninjahood, arguing against him, mocking and insulting him, trolling him, etc. have been a waste of your time. It's like yall don't even see that stuff doesn't even phase ninjahood anymore.
One person complaining a lot isn't the same as multiple ppl complaining a lot AND replying to ninjahood with the same tired arguments.
Yet you've typed multiple paragraphs condoning and advocating why ppl should argue with ninjahood about this. Rehashing and regurgitating the same old talking points for who I don't know. You're not in here arguing with him then you're trolling him and addressing him indirectly with the clear intention to insult and inflame this same old tired argument. I aint surprised at this though, this is the same type of digging in arguing your stance nonsense you did in the ****** thread except this time around it's for an even more pointless cause and effort.
If you say so but then like I said it's an odd compelling dedication you guys have to be in here again going through the same **** about TAN
Unchallenged? What notions? About TAN?Why is it so important? Why are yall so insecure about it? I thought yall already said the thread aint going nowhere after what Meth did? You mean to tell me every time ninjahood says something that you think is ridiculous no matter the topic or level of worth in regards to the topic I should expect multiple NTers to reply to him in this manner every time? Like seriously this aint a race thread, homosexual, political, or even standard of living of thread. Yall dudes in here arguing about the thread about nothing. Do you not see the futility?

It's not that serious.
Yes he did but it seems you want to argue semantics now. Had ppl kept abusing the thread by circumventing the rules he would have locked the thread and no other volumes or versions of the thread would've been permitted. Hence, banishment but if you want to pretend you remember word for word everything Meth has said about this topic go ahead with your versions of events. It really doesn't change my main point if you want to twist one thing cuz you don't remember and understand it right.

you can't possibly be serious?

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

you can't possibly be serious?

Why?, is it serious and not futile what most of these dudes continue to do on a weekly to monthly basis in various threads?

I mean don't get me wrong on my efforts. All I did was simply point out some of the hypocrisy. I know these same dudes are going to do the same thing next week. I'm not about to keep pointing it out to them every time.

 

[supremeclntl]

Why?, is it serious and not futile what most of these dudes continue to do on a weekly to monthly basis in various threads?

I mean don't get me wrong on my efforts. All I did was simply point out some of the hypocrisy. I know these same dudes are going to do the same thing next week. I'm not about to keep pointing it out to them every time.

so you wrote paragraphs upon paragraphs criticizing others about defending a thread about nothing. And you did this in a thread about threads???

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

Why?, is it serious and not futile what most of these dudes continue to do on a weekly to monthly basis in various threads?


I mean don't get me wrong on my efforts. All I did was simply point out some of the hypocrisy. I know these same dudes are going to do the same thing next week. I'm not about to keep pointing it out to them every time.

so you wrote paragraphs upon paragraphs criticizing others about defending a thread about nothing. And you did this in a thread about threads???

Yeah, don't see how the 2nd part of your post is relevant though. It's a thread about threads you don't like not come and defend a thread you like, so what?

 

[supremeclntl]

Yeah, don't see how the 2nd part of your post is relevant though. It's a thread about threads you don't like not come and defend a thread you like, so what?

don't worry it's relevant. 

 

[Peep Game]

Wait a minute...this isn't the booty appreciation thread. Good day guys.

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

Yeah, don't see how the 2nd part of your post is relevant though. It's a thread about threads you don't like not come and defend a thread you like, so what?

don't worry it's relevant. 

Yet you're incapable of explaining why? You'd rather just say it is and what troll? I'm not worried though.

 

[championboyz7]

Wait a minute...this isn't the booty appreciation thread. Good day guys.

 

[supremeclntl]

Yet you're incapable of explaining why? You'd rather just say it is and what troll? I'm not worried though.

obviously!

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

I don't think you know what that word means.

 

[supremeclntl]

I don't think you know what that word means.

obviously.

are you embarrassed?

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

It's pretty obvious you're trolling, your entire line of questioning so far really doesn't amount to much. Embarrassed, worried, or w/e else you say next meh.

It's either that or you're a noob and if so I'm sorry since it's clear you're new to posting on forums.

 

[iYen]

Nah there's clear differences between posting on a forum for a long time and posting in one thread thousands of times and then getting defensive when anyone says anything negative about said thread. You're in another thread now along with the same group of other ppl not even being on topic anymore but specifically going against the grain against one person about whether your precious thread should exist or not while at the same time claiming you've already won.

I could argue that having over 2,000 posts in one thread pales in comparison to keeping up with threads for a long time(3-5 years).

You could but it wouldn't be the same. I'm not surprised you don't see that though.

But, that's a waste of time.

Irony, most of the posts in this thread addressing ninjahood, arguing against him, mocking and insulting him, trolling him, etc. have been a waste of your time. It's like yall don't even see that stuff doesn't even phase ninjahood anymore.

You're being subjective again. I could argue that the amount of complaining that was done by ninjahood was more than the tanner's complaining. Arguing over what's worse than this or that is a wast of time. I was illustrating how your own reasoning could be used against you.

One person complaining a lot isn't the same as multiple ppl complaining a lot AND replying to ninjahood with the same tired arguments.

I'm not arguing with ninjahood. Various people have, but I'm not one of em. I've discussed this same topic with ninjahood a while ago, but I was foolish to think that ninjahood actually reads posts other than the ones that already agree with what he's saying.

#2
I'm not arguing with ninjahood so this paragraph shouldn't be directed at me.

Yet you've typed multiple paragraphs condoning and advocating why ppl should argue with ninjahood about this. Rehashing and regurgitating the same old talking points for who I don't know. You're not in here arguing with him then you're trolling him and addressing him indirectly with the clear intention to insult and inflame this same old tired argument. I aint surprised at this though, this is the same type of digging in arguing your stance nonsense you did in the ****** thread except this time around it's for an even more pointless cause and effort.

My jimmies remain unrustled.

If you say so but then like I said it's an odd compelling dedication you guys have to be in here again going through the same **** about TAN

Do you really expect nters to let the ridiculous notions that are typed from ninjahood's sidekick keyboard to go unchallenged?

Unchallenged? What notions? About TAN?Why is it so important? Why are yall so insecure about it? I thought yall already said the thread aint going nowhere after what Meth did? You mean to tell me every time ninjahood says something that you think is ridiculous no matter the topic or level of worth in regards to the topic I should expect multiple NTers to reply to him in this manner every time? Like seriously this aint a race thread, homosexual, political, or even standard of living of thread. Yall dudes in here arguing about the thread about nothing. Do you not see the futility?

It's not that serious.

Meth didn't contemplated banning it. He said that he would have locked it if people kept using it as a way to circumvent the rules.

Yes he did but it seems you want to argue semantics now. Had ppl kept abusing the thread by circumventing the rules he would have locked the thread and no other volumes or versions of the thread would've been permitted. Hence, banishment but if you want to pretend you remember word for word everything Meth has said about this topic go ahead with your versions of events. It really doesn't change my main point if you want to twist one thing cuz you don't remember and understand it right.

I already said that I dropped the subject so sorry for making you waste your time typing that.

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

No waste, seems the other tan advocates have stopped so others read, it wasn't all just for you really.

 

[iYen]

da tan needs tu b locked b lyke da knees of da catcher need to b locked wen he catching more den balls b.
amirite?

Sometimes you are funny, but most of the time you just try way too hard.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

 

[iYen]

No waste seems the other tan advocates have stopped so others read, it wasn't all just for you really.

Quotes all your posts.

Wasn't for you.

 

[x Buddha Bless x]

No waste seems the other tan advocates have stopped so others read, it wasn't all just for you really.

Quotes all your posts.
Wasn't for you.

It wasn't all for you, could've been directed to the rest of your tan buddies just as easily. You can't understand that? The point remains the same. You were even saying some of the stuff shouldn't be directed to you but others. No need to be aggy.

 

[jonathango]

OF thread in music forum, that isn't music :x

 

[eazye 804]

DRAKE IN DADA thread!!!!!

 

[iYen]

No waste seems the other tan advocates have stopped so others read, it wasn't all just for you really.

Quotes all your posts.
Wasn't for you.

It wasn't all for you, could've been directed to the rest of your tan buddies just as easily. You can't understand that?

The point remains the same. You were even saying some of the stuff shouldn't be directed to you but others. No need to be aggy.

I'm joking with you. Just because I don't agree with every thing you've posted so far doesn't mean that I'm agitated.

I don't wear tan on my chest.

Some people call tan a legion, team, etc, and if you frequented the thread, you'd see that I don't really agree with that.