DiCaprio continuously wins at life...

0524-leonardo-dicaprio-wenn-3.jpg


6 yambs, chillin on a yacht in the South of France.

FML :frown:

At 38-years-old is this really winning? Looks lonely to me.
Begging 20-year-olds for yambs...?
 
nomad might be on to something

demanding career like that, lots of money and fame.........maybe never had the time to commit to a meaningful relationship or just scared too

or maybe leo doesnt want the whole wife and kids things......


eh he still winning
 
At 38-years-old is this really winning? Looks lonely to me.
Begging 20-year-olds for yambs...?
A picture of a man squinting while looking at the glorious sun shine on him, his yacht and his 6 super model "friends" brings you to the conclusion that he's "lonely". 
 
 
Let me get this straight...dudes are mad at DiCaprio for an acting role where he looked too comfortable saying the N-word?

:lol:

lol wut?
 
I have faith in the movie because Scorsese is directing, but I don't see an Oscar coming out of it for Leo.

Leo should have won for The Departed, Aviator, and Django.

I think Matthew McConaughy is taking it for either Mud or Dallas Buyers Club
 
I also think he should have won for Django Unchained, but I can't think of another movie of his that I thought he deserved to win.

He should have also won for What's Eating Gilbert Grape?
 
Last edited:
realtalk brah they said they the word in an almost taunting way. every single seen the word was used doezens of times. like you cant just say slaves? or even negro?
 
realtalk brah they said they the word in an almost taunting way. every single seen the word was used doezens of times. like you cant just say slaves? or even negro?

It's Tarantino man, he knows the only way it passes is if it's "acting". At least this is somewhat excusable because of the subject of the movie. All that "dead ****** storage" talk was completely unnecessary in Pulp Fiction. I swear the first time I saw it I just knew he wrote that in there cause he wanted to say it in front of a black person, wasn't integral to the story at all. And Samuel L either doesn't care or wants the roll bad enough to ignore it.
 
You guys seen Tarantino's interview on BET? I was too embarrassed for him to watch more than a minute of it :lol:
 
I think the Oscar committe refuses to give Leo an Oscar because they know that no one man should be winning at life that much.

Leo is dat dude. Looks after his Bros, schools young cats in the game, gets more yambs than a Jamaican farmer :smokin
 
Last edited:
realtalk brah they said they the word in an almost taunting way. every single seen the word was used doezens of times. like you cant just say slaves? or even negro?

It's Tarantino man, he knows the only way it passes is if it's "acting". At least this is somewhat excusable because of the subject of the movie. All that "dead ****** storage" talk was completely unnecessary in Pulp Fiction. I swear the first time I saw it I just knew he wrote that in there cause he wanted to say it in front of a black person, wasn't integral to the story at all. And Samuel L either doesn't care or wants the roll bad enough to ignore it.

So what, can there only be racists characters in movies about slavery? I think that character was just an *** hole. Plus he was probably none too pleased about a couple of goons showing up at his house with a dead body. I think you're reaching.
 
Only on NT where a post about a man enjoying life on a yacht with copious amounts of dimes to gawk at, salivate over, and not to mention the yamb action in the lower deck where the cocaine is passed around freely in a big *** diamond encrusted bowl would turn into a debate over the dialogue used in a movie where the actor plays a slave master in the antebellum south. 

Ya'll would ruin a wet dream if you could. 

mean.gif
 
Last edited:
Only on NT where a post about a man enjoying life on a yacht with copious amounts of dimes to gawk at, salivate over, and not to mention the yamb action in the lower deck where the cocaine is passed around freely in a big *** diamond encrusted bowl would turn into a debate over the dialogue used in a movie where the actor plays a slave master in the antebellum south. 

Ya'll would ruin a wet dream if you could. 

:smh:

Lol right, always trying to bring up racism somehow
 
So what, can there only be racists characters in movies about slavery? I think that character was just an *** hole. Plus he was probably none too pleased about a couple of goons showing up at his house with a dead body. I think you're reaching.

Who am I to say what there can and can't be? I can make judgements about people based on their decisions though can't I?

How was his racism relevant to the plot, or anything in the movie at all for that matter? Other than that one line, the characters supposed racism never surfaced again and had no effect on how the scene played out. It's like he threw it in there just because, for shock value apparently, and thats being generous. That was the big complaint about Django, using the word for it's shock value alone. It trivializes it and ignores the fact that just because its a movie with actors doesn't mean it isn't still offensive to some.
 
Back
Top Bottom