- 2,350
- 270
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2001
false evidence? lol no. however, if he presented it correctly he may be able to walk the line. the defense would object anyways, but by that time, damage has been done to the jury.
ex.
"I want to play you a little recording."
*plays fake recording*
"who do you hear in the background?"
(if the defense objects here... then its a lost cause. defense might recognize fast enough this tape isnt in evidence, or that its a fake but if he doesnt...)
witness: thats gerogie!
"what? this is a fake recording. I was going to ask if it was possible to tell whos voice that was at all since you'd never met them, much like trayvon."
(objection would DEFINITELY come in here, but the damage is done)
just an example, but it wouldnt necessarily violate rules, more like... loophole. since youre not planting, tainting, suppressing, or forging evidence.
Just stop.