R.I.P Trayvon


false evidence? lol no. however, if he presented it correctly he may be able to walk the line. the defense would object anyways, but by that time, damage has been done to the jury.

ex.
"I want to play you a little recording."

*plays fake recording*

"who do you hear in the background?"


(if the defense objects here... then its a lost cause. defense might recognize fast enough this tape isnt in evidence, or that its a fake but if he doesnt...)

witness: thats gerogie!


"what? this is a fake recording. I was going to ask if it was possible to tell whos voice that was at all since you'd never met them, much like trayvon."

(objection would DEFINITELY come in here, but the damage is done)



just an example, but it wouldnt necessarily violate rules, more like... loophole. since youre not planting, tainting, suppressing, or forging evidence.


:lol:

Just stop.
 
^^^ i dont get your point. in your example, not only was mistrial DENIED... but, it had nothing to do with "new evidence" o_O

My point is that a defense can request a mistrial from the judge if the prosecution is acting improper to sway the jury into finding the defendant guilty and not just according the definition you posted.
Which meaning falsifying a recording (like you stated he should have done) would not be new evidence and can lead to a mistrial.

http://www.ktvb.com/news/crime/Judge-declares-mistrial-in-Bujak-case-192610101.html

"CALDWELL -- Former Canyon County Prosecutor John Bujak's latest court case has been declared a mistrial.
Bujak was on trial for allegations that he created false evidence.
The judge declared a mistrial because Bujak did not disclose some of his evidence to the prosecution.
In a statement, Bujak says he thought he had the right not to disclose those materials.
He apologized to everyone involved and thanked the jurors. The case will likely be retried.
Bujak is also scheduled to go on trial for a separate charge of misuse of public funds in March."
 
Last edited:
just now logging on what has happened so far today?
Before lunch recess today there were 5 witnesses (2 married couples and 1 individual) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 5 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 

Also, believe it or not all 5 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
 
Last edited:
Before lunch recess today there were 4 witnesses (2 married couples) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 4 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 

Also, believe it or not all 4 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
Speak for yourself, They seemed absolutely credible to me.
 
Before lunch recess today there were 4 witnesses (2 married couples) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 4 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 

Also, believe it or not all 4 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
Speak for yourself, They seemed absolutely credible to me.
Thus proving my point from earlier that FRAUDS of a feather flock together. 
 
Hey TEK, sit the **** down. You're only making it worse.

You clearly have no idea how courts work. Just.........stop. :lol: :lol:

p.s. thx for the laugh...needed that
 
"Doesn't even sound like me"

is something I would say if I heard my own voice on probably any recording..
 
Last edited:
just now logging on what has happened so far today?

Before lunch recess today there were 5 witnesses (2 married couples and 1 individual) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 5 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 

Also, believe it or not all 5 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
:smh: were they all melanin deficient?
 
just now logging on what has happened so far today?
Before lunch recess today there were 5 witnesses (2 married couples and 1 individual) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 5 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 

Also, believe it or not all 5 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
mean.gif
were they all melanin deficient?
Of course. 
 
just now logging on what has happened so far today?


Before lunch recess today there were 5 witnesses (2 married couples and 1 individual) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 5 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 


Also, believe it or not all 5 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
:smh: were they all melanin deficient?

Of course. 
did zimmermans black friend testify yet????
 
Hey TEK, sit the **** down. You're only making it worse.

You clearly have no idea how courts work. Just.........stop.
laugh.gif
laugh.gif


p.s. thx for the laugh...needed that
cut it out. criminology major. loopholes exist in court. its very possible to trick a witness on stand. take a seat.

and LOLLLLLLLLLL @ melanin deficient! just bust out laughing at work
did zimmermans black friend testify yet????
hes awaiting being called to the stand, right next to Manti Te'os girlfriend.
 
Last edited:
See now, in this case O'mara is having the witness demonstrate the mounted position. Prosecutor should turn this against him. Have the witness mount him again, and ask how with your head being smashed, and u getting "pounded" on...you can reach AROUND the straddle to grab the gun from your waist...before your attacker does.
 
just now logging on what has happened so far today?

Before lunch recess today there were 5 witnesses (2 married couples and 1 individual) that testified for the defendant George Zimmerman.  All 5 witnesses given their testimony were deemed to be FRAUDS as they all have gave either money, clothes, or food to Zimmerman leading up to the trial and case. 


Also, believe it or not all 5 witnesses were not able to hear the words "******g punks" or these ******** always get away" which were direct words from George Zimmerman as he called into the non-emergency line during the recording that was played over and over again.  That is what has happened so far today champ. 
mean.gif
were they all melanin deficient?
Of course. 
did zimmermans black friend testify yet????
Joe Oliver...........not yet but I'm really hoping he takes the stand.

Between the old Vietnam solider from earlier reliving old TV episodes of M*A*S*H and this so called MMA trainer giving demonstrations this has been a funny day of testimony. 
 
never argued it wouldnt be inadmissible. in fact, i said it would be thrown out. HOWEVER, i said the point of this was to get the jury to hear it once. cuz once that happens, the damage is done. the seed is planted.
wouldn't it be thrown out prior to the jury hearing it tho...
 
Back
Top Bottom