R.I.P Trayvon

[beh235]

they trying to troll dude on Skype?

 

[superblytrife]

So much Skype trolling.  

 

[harlemtothebronx]

My god.

 

[superb]

If not 2nd degree

It should be manslaughter

If not manslaughter it should be perjury

But watch this fool walk on all counts cuz his pops is a judge

End of story

His Pops is NOT I reapet NOT a judge, He was a magistrates,magistrates are judicial officers, with no power that judges have nor do they do trials.

They are like the security officers to police officers

 

[fraij da 5 11]

These idiots up there with their skype account names broadcast to the world while they're trying to question a witness on National TV.

These MFers got a law degree but are illiterate in common sense.

Judge getting PISSED.

 

[nobody]

 

[mikejeffjo]

Zimmy ain't put on a defense yet and you already throwing in the towel? lol

Towel what towel fool

This aint the nba finals

This real life it aint a game

Its only a game to those who always win

Can't win in my skin kid

 

[011781]

This is bizarre. Almost embarrassing. Why can't this guy appear in court again?

dude is on vacation... he went hiking or some ****

 

[elpablo21]

is this real life?

 

[lyonbc1]

I will only ever visit Florida on vacation these laws are horrendous

 

[mikejeffjo]

His Pops is NOT I reapet NOT a judge, He was a magistrates,magistrates are judicial officers, with no power that judges have nor do they do trials.

They are like the security officers to police officers

Working for the law is working for the law

You really sound ignorant thinking 1 title is greater than the other

They protect they own

Miss me with that technical marlarchy

His dad was a judge

Cuz I say so now what

 

[servechilled81]

is this real life?

it was glorious 

 

[lyonbc1]

this is so weird hahah

 

[Mound Raised]

Had to step away.... I take it the skype call was a fail?

 

[Mound Raised]

Lawd, let the gun go off in court

 

[servechilled81]

Had to step away.... I take it the skype call was a fail?

Once they got it working, people saw him on tv and started calling non-stop

 

[rashi]

Poor gun etiquette.

 

[nobody]

I hope Zimmy gets his gun back after the trial.

 

[letsgetit22]

Well, then you get into what is "equal" force? How do you objectify "equal force". You can kill someone punching someone in the nose once by the bone hitting the brain, but you can shoot someone 10 times and they survive. That part is very vague (like all of the laws).

I agree. But going back to the claim of reasonable doubt. Does that only apply when you have been physically injured, or can you have reasonable doubt that you're in danger if someone is following you? Therefore you have the right to defend or protect yourself by attacking.

 

[sharkin]

If the prosecution had an add-to-cell bot, this trial woulda been sold out by 8:01

 

[superb]

Working for the law is working for the law

You really sound ignorant thinking 1 title is greater than the other

They protect they own

Miss me with that technical marlarchy

His dad was a judge

Cuz I say so now what

dad was not a judge he was a retired magistrate. last time he worked was 2006. he have no pull what so ever

 

[elpablo21]

is this real life?

it was glorious 

That was some grade A trolling right there

 

[rashi]

I agree. But going back to the claim of reasonable doubt. Does that only apply when you have been physically injured, or can you have reasonable doubt that you're in danger if someone is following you? Therefore you have the right to defend or protect yourself?

From my understanding, having someone "following" you is not enough provocation to use force in Florida.


This is the Justifiable Use of Force section.

[

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.
(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or
(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.
(5) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.
(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.

 

[shoelyesses]

dad was not a judge he was a retired magistrate. last time he worked was 2006. he have no pull what so ever

true but I think ppl are saying his dad could provide counsel, insight, and perspective to the law and how to handle this situation, more then the average citizen.

 

[mikejeffjo]

dad was not a judge he was a retired magistrate. last time he worked was 2006. he have no pull what so ever

My boy mama was a cook county court clerk

She got him off drug dealing,gun distrubution to a officcer,car jacking,and arm robbery

The only time she couldn't help him was when he did a murder and he only did 7yrs for that

So stop it I know about how much pull someone has when they work for the law

Tell that crap to another dummy I'm the wrong one