Everything about this ep says it's paranoia.
He's definitely a priest investigating the disappearance/death of the molester priest.
You're going to have to explain that one G
well I can see why you don't write reviews. Things aren't always what they seem, especially now that nearly every program tries to present some sort of sleight of hand to get people talking. Also, I never said he was definitely a fed, just that the possibility existed. You assumed that I was trying to prove he was, I was just talking about the possibility that he could be.
I don't think he gets paid for it.
This is not a good way to analyze tv shows. The anything can happen mentality is an excuse for laziness or just random 1st idea that pops in your head theories.
Yes, I do get paid for it. I also get paid for record and movie reviews. I've been writing professionally for years. It's not so simple as saying "anything happens." It's looking at the possibility of things within the context of a show. Let's take this Fed/Priest thing and look at it in the context of a show that just dealt with Ray ******* up a high-ranking official's career. It's not "anything can happen" to think that it is possible that that agent would want some payback and would have an idea just where to go to get it. It's hardly random, sorry son.
True, it hasn't been "that kind of show." But with a new show runner comes new ideas. That's what forums are for, speculation, for me. I wouldn't spend an entire article speculating about what could happen because it can come back to bite you if you're wildly incorrect. That said the speculation part is fun and gets you thinking about different things, especially thematically.
That's what you just did though.
Not what I did. but okay.
You definitely did when you backed it up by saying other shows are all trying to do the surprise reveal sort of thing.
You just did it again.
If the pay was great I would. You kinda making it look easy based off that prediction and your argument for it.
You're arguing against things I'm not saying. I went back to your earlier posts trying to understand your argument, and it seems you're confusing "analysis" and "speculation." The two things are not the same. Analysis, which is what I would do for a piece, is looking at the text (the video in this case, just in case the use of the term text in this context loses you) and drawing out theme from what is in the text. For example, I look at the obvious symbols in "Ding" and surmise that the writers are intending the symbols to be obvious, telling us that the characters can't see what is plainly in front of them (Paige's braces say she's a Daddy's girl playing games but Ray ignores the obvious and takes her seriously). Speculation is saying "What if the priest is a fed sent by Cochran to get revenge?" There's scant evidence, only supposition. But nothing stopping me from asking the question, and it doesn't mean my analysis of the show is off.
@ that beat down. This priest Romero is nuts. He legit talking about repentance and forgiveness in a den of alleged child molesters. I mean it's so ******* sick. They're allegedly trying to make up for what they did while O'Connor played denial the whole damn time he was being interrogated until it was too late but we suppose to believe he was on the right path.
I was howling when he said that.
He was letting out all that rage after Ray and Terry barked on him. Only gave Terry a taste but damn near killed one of those guys.
bakajin
by stating simply, just because you speculate about it( in a forum thread nonetheless) doesn't mean you are Going to write an article about it, because writing an article about it and being wrong is where it can bite you in the ***.
