- 37,433 Posts. Joined 5/2001
- Reputation: 2613
- Select All Posts By This User
Correct. Jennings is nothing more than your local ball hogging, bad shooting, no passing dude that NOBODY wants on their team. Every local basketball spot has a Jennings.
not fair comparison one person clearly had a much more talented team....by your standards Derek Fisher now>both because he lead a team recently to the finals.
Jennings is a score first pg who really isn't a efficient/effective scorer. Plus from a franchise/commercialization standpoint wall is more marketable.... ie same reason Lin got his ridiculous contract.
You put Jennings on any of those wizs teams Wall had and they wouldn't be making the playoffs either. I mean is he leaps and bounds better the Jennings......NO. But his ceiling is higher, he hasn't been stagnant (actually regressed) as far as improving as a player like Jennings has, and is the franchise of a desolated team in which Jennings is not.
You act like their personal performances are conducive to WHY each of their teams have fared the way they have.
Milwaukee didn't make the playoffs because Jennings "led" them and the Wizards not making the playoffs doesn't have anything to do with Wall's performances (when he's played).
There are 11 other players on each team you might wanna go down the list and compare before we bring the playoffs into a discussion about Jennings and Wall.
Jennings also has played one more season than he has.
word...he got no half game skills. His game is all based on his speed.
Tony Parker was good, relied on his skills more than Wall, but didn't have a jump shot and was very young playing on a Championship Caliber Team, TP is more comparable to Derrick Rose.
I don't John Wall will ever be a on either one of those guys level.
San Antonio Spurs: MCMXCIX, MMIII, MMV, MMVII, MMXIV
I Never Cried When _____ Died, But I Definitely Will When Hov Does