Official 2013 NBA Offseason Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jennings (said he wanted to play for a bigger market....Bucks are the lowest marketed team in the NBA) is a joke, and The Bucks too for trying to bring him back lol they offered him 40/ 4 years 
roll.gif

 
Wrong. Actually the lakers did it before losing to the Pistons

wait a minute you ARE talking about the 2000s lakers who only went to 3 straight

the lakers were the last team who did it but that was in 1982 -1985 and they didnt lose to the pistons but beat the celtics in their 4 th straight finals :smokin
 
Last edited:
Hopefully the bulls beat the pacers in the second round next year so we don't gotta deal with them again
 
Hopefully the bulls beat the pacers in the second round next year so we don't gotta deal with them again

miami got to find a way to get home court. they do not want to find themselves facing both the pacers and nets AND possibly a bulls or knicks team.

they will have truly earned that 4 th straight finals appearance if they get through that.
 
What I meant was your pattern of having 2-3 short posts within a few minutes...then you're gone. :lol: It's just something I noticed.

Scola is a solid grab by Indiana. Still has plenty left in the tank and should be effective in a reduced role as the first big off the bench.

Still not a fan of their PG situation though, even with bringing C.J. Watson on board. And, if they decide to keep him, the Danny Granger question mark continues for another year.



URL]
 
The last team to reach four straight finals were the 84-85-86-87 Celtics.

Lakers did it in 82-83-84-85.

It's virtually impossible nowadays to reach 4 in a row. You're talkin about an extra 75+ PLAYOFF games, while rivals rest several combined months more over that same span.
 
I'm talking about when Kobe had the rape case prior to that they had a 3pear before losing to Chauncey n the pistons in 04'
 
miami's real threat to miss a 4th finals appearance is the nets imo

they've already shown they can beat the pacers and bulls in the past, both teams rosters haven't changed that much so i wouldn't pick against the heat. nets adding KG, pierce, terry, and ak47 to go along with the core players they have is pretty damn stacked.
 
Last edited:
I'm talking about when Kobe had the rape case prior to that they had a 3pear before losing to Chauncey n the pistons in 04'

Man, wtf?

LA 2000, 01, 02.
Spurs 03
Pistons 04. (Vs LA)
Spurs 05
Heat 06
Spurs 07
Celtics 08
LA 09-10
Mavs 11
Heat 12-13

It's not that hard to remember breh. No team since the 87 Celtics made four straight finals, stop arguing.
 
miami's real threat to miss a 4th finals appearance is the nets imo

they've already shown they can beat the pacers and bulls in the past, both teams rosters haven't changed that much so i wouldn't pick against the heat. nets adding KG, pierce, terry, and ak47 to go along with the core players they have is pretty damn stacked.

Yes, the Pacers roster is almost exactly the same, their bench hasn't improved at all.

And Granger won't help out at all either.

You right.....
 
Yes, the Pacers roster is almost exactly the same, their bench hasn't improved at all.

And Granger won't help out at all either.

You right.....

Adding players like Copeland, watson, scola and getting granger back is nice but they still won't beat the heat. Gonna be the 3rd straight year the heat eliminate them imo
 
Last edited:
That's fine, they very well might, but to say their roster is the same is incorrect. Those 4 players and minus one Mike Miller might alter that game 7 they just had, dont'cha think?

We'll see of course, lot can happen in the next 9-10 months.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom